Since Heller made the trigger lock unconstitutional


PDA






Boats
June 29, 2008, 05:05 PM
isn't it time for S&W to drop the hole? Perhaps a petition is in order?

If you enjoyed reading about "Since Heller made the trigger lock unconstitutional" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
NG VI
June 29, 2008, 05:30 PM
Great idea, I don't think I have seen anyone admit to using them yet.

Rugerlvr
June 30, 2008, 10:21 AM
This is being discussed here: http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=374267

Trigger locks are not unconstitutional in any way. What's unconstitutional is requiring them to be used at all times as to render the gun permanently inoperable.

Boats
June 30, 2008, 01:23 PM
Sorry, I shorthanded it. Yes, requiring the use of a TL is what is unconstitutional.

Hence, there is no longer any compelling need for S&W to include a mandatory internal trigger lock.

Then again, I will never buy an ILS equipped S&W revo. If those sale losses from me and the like minded are what they really want, they are welcome to continue ignoring potential customers.

Interestingly, I have a M&P9 that I really like. Why is it that I can get the options of trigger lock and mag disconnect "deleted" on that model, but S&W won't even do sprint runs or PC versions of revos without an ILS?

Eightball
June 30, 2008, 01:36 PM
the thought of them needing to remove the IL has never occurred to me until now.

Hopefully, they'll at least have that as an "option" rather than "mandatory"

If you enjoyed reading about "Since Heller made the trigger lock unconstitutional" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!