Suppressed Weapons....thoughts....


August 27, 2003, 02:54 AM
Been thinking about the use of suppressed weapons.

They have the distinct advantage of making a weapon quieter; they don't "silence" it, by any means, and that whole bit about the MP5SD's bolt reciprocation being more audible than the round firing is probably just a silly urban legend.

However, a suppressed .223 or .308 round will still have an audible sonic crack as the bullet passes by, as the bullets are moving in excess of the speed of sound. Granted, a good .308 suppressor can give the rifle the report of a .22, making it much harder to locate the firer, and that's the idea.

But for idealized suppressed use, you want to utilized subsonic ammunition. It makes an audible difference.

Some weapons are more suited for this than others.

Rifle rounds, typically, are not so well suited. The reason is this. There are two factors that contribute to how much energy a fired round has: bullet mass and bullet velocity. Subtract one and you need to increase the other to keep the energy the same.

Most rifle rounds are bigger on velocity than they are in bullet mass (especially small bore rounds like .223 and 5.45mm).

So, given that the speed of sound at sea level is roughly 1100 feet per second, let us consider 1100FPS at the muzzle the "speed limit" for proper suppressor ammo.

Suddenly, 5.56mm isn't looking so good. 55 or 62 grains at 1100 fps? Pretty sad, performance wise. What's the heaviest 5.56mm bullet available?

.308 fairs better, but not by much. The heaviest factory .308 loads seem to be 180 grains. (The only factory box of .308 subsonic I've seen had 180 grain bullets.) 180 grains at 1100 fps is barely low-level .357 Magnum territory. Now, they make heavier .30 caliber bullets than that; specifically, 220 grain bullets that some .30-06 loads use. I don't know if you could make one of these work in a .308 case, though.

Pistol rounds typically give up less than rifle rounds in this department. For 9mm, you typically have 147 grain bullets at 950-1000 fps, which is a regular standard-pressure load. Other non +P loads are subsonic at the muzzle, too. But if you're maximizing suppressed power, you want the heaviest bullets possible, and the heaviest usable for 9mm is 147 grains, I believe.

.45ACP gives up practically nothing as most .45 loads (including +P) are subsonic at the muzzle anyways. And if your speed limit is 1100 feet per second, a 230 grain bullet beats a 180 grain one.

10mm...don't know how well this would work. There are 220 grain 10mm bullets, though they're not available in any factory load. 220 grains at 1100 fps is pretty respectable for a pistol round, and would offer better penetration than a .45ACP load. (Were any subsonic 10mm loads developed for the suppressed MP5/10mm?)

.357 Sig. Probably better than 9mm in this regard, as it'd have an easier time pushing the heavier bullets to the 1100 fps limit.

.40S&W: Most factory 180 grain loads are subsonic anyways, so unless you want the lighter bullets you're not losing anything.

9x18mm: I believe all 9mm Mak loads are subsonic anyways.

Then you get some oddballs, like .300 Whisper. .300 whisper is a GOOD idea. You can get the .30 caliber bullet to 1100 FPS without all of that wasted case capacity you'd get in a .308. .300 Whisper (in Cor-Bon's load) uses a 220 grain .30-06 bullet and pushes it to 1040 FPS; it equals the performance of suppressed .308 in a smaller, lighter package. (In theory, with the extra case capacity, .308 could push a heavier bullet to the same speed, but I think 220 grains is the heaviest .30 caliber bullet available right now.)

What I think would be REALLY interesting for suppressed use would be some of the big bore magnum loads. Again, if your maximum velocity is 1100 fps, you may as well have the heaviest bullet possible. There are 300+ grain bullets available for the .44 Magnum. Obviously, suppressing a revolver has its own set of problems, but you could use the .44 Magnum round in a semiauto "thumper" carbine with an integral suppressor. Better suited to such a carbine would be the nearly-extinct .45 Win Mag round, with its 320 grain bullets. .50AE could work too.

Just some late night musings. Any thoughts?

If you enjoyed reading about "Suppressed Weapons....thoughts...." here in archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join today for the full version!
Steve Smith
August 27, 2003, 10:25 AM
I discussed this with JD Jones a few months ago. The big thing that comes into play is keeping accuracy and energy at distance. The frontal area of larger bore bullets is detrimental to both of these. His tests showed that the 220 and 240 grain .308 from the .300 Whisper was near about the best one could get with bullets that are commonly available.

August 27, 2003, 10:39 AM
bolt reciprocation being more audible than the round firing is probably just a silly urban legend. A sub-sonic 9mm can be suppressed to a level where the bolt - and the bullet striking the target - makes more sound than the shot itself. At least if you stand behind the weapon, it makes more sound down range. You can test this by shooting against for example a tree line and hear the echo. Full power 5.56 and 7.62 both make enough bullet crack to be uncomfortable (and I assume harmful) to shoot without hearing protection, but only just.

What are you going to use it for? I would think there are other factors than muzzle energy alone that may be relevant. To do a little musing myself, let me see if I can think of some scenarios:

"James Bond": You don't really need that much power to "thump" a commie spy at close range, it's all about bullet placement. Besides, I think it makes more sense to have a "can" suppressor for your regular weapon than to drag arond some Hollyweird contraption, both for logistical reasons and because of the fact that a .44 mag suppressor is going to be much bigger than, say a .32 acp suppressor, simply because there is a lot more powder gas to cool down. And the .32 is actually a pretty good little cartridge, as long as you stay within its limitations.

FSH... SFTH... ah, crap, you know what I mean. "Tactical" stuff with lots of fancy acronyms. First, spray and pray. Is it worth the effort to make a submachinegun with a "non-standard" cartridge even if it is a bit more powerful than a subsonic 9mm? A suppressed MP5 offers the advantages of being the same as the "standard" non-suppressed one, as far as familiarity is concerned, and it uses standard ammunition (it bleeds off pressure to reduce the velocity of full pressure loads), which is a plus from a logistical point of view. Does the increased power make up for the increase in weight and size of the weapon? Secondly: Sniping. Accuracy is more important than power. I would believe a suppressed 7.62 with a subsonic 180 grain bullet will give more velocity and potential accuracy at longer ranges than a short, fat 330 grain pistol bullet will do, even if the latter has more energy at the muzzle. The rifle will have the added advantage of being able to shoot regular ammo if you need to "reach out and touch someone" beyond subsonic range - and the suppressor will still offer a considerable reduction of the noise.

The use that is most realistic for most of us: Plinking, hunting, "yardwork". The only suppressed shots I have ever fired "in anger" have been at cats, rats - and one mouse... Otherwise it's plinking and target shooting without the need for hearing protection. A suppressed .30 caliber could be used with slow ammo for small game and regular strenght for big game, see "sniping" above. I've been thinking about buying a .30 cal suppressor for this, but I don't really hunt enough to need one right now. Which brings me to the next point:

What does "need" have to do with anything? The "Shiny New Toy Syndrome" is also a factor. My only suppressors at this time are for .22s. I keep thinking that a suppressed .357 or .44 carbine would be really neat for yardwork, if you have rats that are too big for a .22. But realistically, I need to get myself a yard before I really need a gun specifically for yardwork. :)

As you say, when the velocity is given, the only way to increase energy is to increase the weight of the projectile. Which brings me back to the fact that a heavier projectile requires more energy to propel it to that given veolcity. That means more powder and a larger volume of hot powder gas, which leads to a proportionally larger suppressor to handle that gas. At some point that size will become a limiting factor. I have no doubt that it is possible to build a suppressed mortar that will shoot bowling balls at 1100 fps, but it wouldn't be very practical for most applications I can think of. And finally, a suppressor does make a real difference with supersonic ammunition, even if it isn't "silent". A Finnish company makes a suppressor for use with full power .50 BMG. It reduces not only sound, but also muzzle blast - and it reduces felt recoil as well as or better than any other type of muzzle brake.

PS: Ain't it nice to live in a country where you can mail order a suppressor without having to ask Big Brother for permission? :neener:

August 27, 2003, 11:35 AM
Nightcrawler, along your same train of thought is the Russian 9x39. Bascially (as I understand it as there aren't any in the country) it is a 7.62x39 opened up to .35 caliber, utilizing a heavy bullet at around 1000 fps. After reading Cutshaw's review of the cartridge and the guns it is chambered in (think miniture integrally supressed AKs) I want one really bad.

I have a friend who owned a suppresed Remington 700 in .308. The interesting thing was that when he used regular ammo there was still the supersonic crack, however it wasn't nearly as bad to shoot with out hearing protection. And the best part? You could not pinpoint where the sound came from. He also loaded up some subsonic loads, and we were still able to make good hits out to 200 yards. With this load it sounded like you were dryfiring, and then the clang as the bullet hit the steel target. :) Very fun stuff.

I don't own any suppresors yet. But I will. :D

August 27, 2003, 11:47 AM
What's the heaviest 5.56mm bullet available?
Largest I've heard of is 100 grain loads.

August 27, 2003, 11:54 AM
PS: Ain't it nice to live in a country where you can mail order a suppressor without having to ask Big Brother for permission?

You suck!:cuss:

You too, Kobun!!! :cuss:


Anyone know anything about the new HK subsonic caliber?

August 27, 2003, 12:20 PM

You realize you couldn't buy or make that thing? A suppressor is also a flashhider.

John Ross
August 27, 2003, 12:26 PM
Nightcrawler: "What I think would be REALLY interesting for suppressed use would be some of the big bore magnum loads."

With this in mind I rebarreled a Ruger #1 with a 16 1/2" bull match barrel in .50 Alaskan with a 10" twist. You can shoot 750 grain Hornady match bullets at 1050 FPS with sub-minute accuracy. Velocity decay at extended ranges is VERY little. Dale Blaylock made a stainless can 10" long. Very quiet.

API slugs and spotter bullets make for interesting shooting. Neat gun.

JD now does a .500 Whisper on a Weatherby action, using shortened .460 brass. More expensive and more trouble to make ammo than my gun, but he gets 3 shots total.

JR, the .500 Specialist

August 27, 2003, 12:50 PM
Hm. Mullins ammo makes several heavy subsonic 5.56 loads, at least one which is designed to NOT cycle a AR15/M16 ation.

I'm thinking of having a "Ghost Scout" .35 Whelen built on one of my 1917 actions. I plan on using heavy .357 XTP's.

Been thinking of the "ideal" suppressed bolt weapon for years. Done a lot of thinking 'bout a turnbolt .45 Colt. 260 or 300 grain HP at 1000 fps, zeroed at 50 meters...

JD was kind enough to talk to me years ago about suppressive technology. Among other things, we discussed integrally suppressed 12 gauge rounds, but he said that each round would have to be licensed...


August 27, 2003, 02:12 PM
What would you do with it???? Ok, picture this. I mean, close your eyes and feel it with me! It's 2:00 am, you gotta get up at 5:30, and your neighbor three or four houses down has had his stereo thumping on extra max plus bass for the last 4 1/2 hours. It's so bad that the windows in your house are actually vibrating and rattling in their frames. You've called the local Po-Po twice, but when the boys in blue arrive, the jerk turns it down, waits for them to leave, and cranks it even louder!!! Are we there?? Can you feel it? OK, now enter a nine MM carbine (CX-4 Storm?) with a suppressor and a 9 or 12 power night vision scope, and you can see the stereo sitting on the floor, through the purposely opened window, and he's just sitting there, laughing. CHOICE! The stereo or the neighbor?? Oh, the agony of indecision!!

Just for the record, this is all tongue-in-cheek sarcasm. I'm not advocating ANYBODY fire into their neighbors house, however justified it may seem at the time. But, yes, there are uses for it.


The only thing required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke :: ;)

August 27, 2003, 02:34 PM

Not to advocate anything dangerous, illegal, or stupid. BUT once upon a time in college I knew a certain person who shall remain unnamed, whose downstairs neighbor in an apartment complex kept playing their stereo at super high volume at all hours of the night. The neighbors were also idiots, who refused to be civil to anybody else in the complex.

One night (during finals week) the before mentioned loud neighbors were playing Nine Inch Nails Hump you like an Animal at the same decibal level as a 747 at takeoff. The neighbors were having a party, and there were a large number of very drunk people in the downstairs apartment.

Our unnamed person had called the police a few times with no result. Finally the unnamed hero retrieved a three foot length of pipe, and went downstairs. He killed the power to the building. (the fuse box for all apartments was in the hall). Then in the dark, he proceeded to kick in the door of the apartment, shoved his way through the confused drunks and smashed the stereo repeatedly with the pipe. He then exited during the confusion.

No one was hurt, but the stereo was destroyed. The drunks wandered off when they couldn't figure out how to turn the power back on.

NOTE this person would not do this again. And I'm guessing he would not advocate anybody else doing it because it was really stupid. But it sure makes a good story. :D

Sorry for the thread drift. Now back to our original thread.

August 27, 2003, 03:22 PM
This person was not approximately the size of Sasquatch, was he?

No? Just asking. :D

August 27, 2003, 03:45 PM
LOL that's the funniest story I've read in a while. How did the 'operator' find the location of the target?

August 27, 2003, 04:20 PM
Hey, I live in a college dorm, with thin walls...somebody farts 3 doors down and you can hear it....people have stereos...

lead pipe, you say? Cut the power first, you say?


(Of course, I'd rather dick with those obnoxious art students next door that are always parking in our lot (against the regs) and taking up our spaces. Heck, this morning I was woken up by them throwing wooden blocks into a steel dumpster. Granted, it was like 10:45AM, but when your first class is at noon you're not really inclined to get up any earlier than that.)

August 27, 2003, 04:39 PM
Skunk, from what I was told, he had seen it before through the open door because of the previous times he had been down there to ask them to be quiet. :)

Enough thread veer. Sorry.

August 27, 2003, 06:09 PM
Hey Skunk! I haven't even said anything yet. :confused:
And I still suck when I have invited your furry tail over here for some shooting?
Don't make me change my mind now... ;)

Cordex, I have heard of 105 grain 223 bullets. Don't know if they are available though.

Starpower, that is why the "compressed metal" training rounds are so great.
When they hit something hard, they dump the energy and turn into dust.
Anyone know where I can get some? (Bullets only please). :)

A bullet made from compressed graphite might be something for loud stereos. It would be a small version of the graphite bombs that are used to short circuit powerplants. :cool:

I guess I should post some pictures of a supressed rifle.
Its built on a K98, is fully supressed, and is chambered for a wildcat that is really easy to make; .458-2"
Take a .458 Winmag case, and cut down to 2"
Load with convential bullets, or cast 770(?) grain slugs.
Its a great rifle, but at about $3000, its a bit too much for me now. :(

August 27, 2003, 07:36 PM
Hey Skunk! I haven't even said anything yet.
And I still suck when I have invited your furry tail over here for some shooting?
Don't make me change my mind now...

Yeah, you still suck! You and your Neostead!!!! :D :D :D (can you put a suppressor on that???)

August 27, 2003, 10:33 PM
From what you're saying, the 45/70 is the ideal suppressed round.

The factory 405 grain Remington JSP loading usually makes just under 1200fps from most rifles.

Load it up with a 500 grain bullet at 1000fps muzzle velocity and you have a rifle that will get impressive results out to as far as you can figure the trajectory. Easy to do if you have time and a laser rangefinder.

I think the 500 grainers at that velocity will easily make 1000 yards if your sights can handle the adjustment.

Plus, the 45-70 is a very low pressure round as rifle rounds go--I think it would silence very nicely...

August 27, 2003, 10:47 PM
The only problem is that the larger the bullet diameter the harder it is to suppress well. In my experience the ideal round is the .300 whisper with the Sierra 240 grain hpbtm. Very quiet until the bullet smacks something.

August 27, 2003, 10:59 PM
A bullet made from compressed graphite might be something for loud stereos. It would be a small version of the graphite bombs that are used to short circuit powerplants. You're over engineering the problem. Most stereos these days are encased primarily in plastic or very thin metal. If your shot placement is right, a decently powerful pellet gun disables a loud stereo pretty effectively and quietly I might add....or so I've heard. ;)

August 27, 2003, 11:19 PM
Hm. On the "quiet disable" idea...

I remember some jerk honking his horn in the neighborhood (apparently to pick up someone) in the wee hours one night, and wishing it were legal to render his noisemaker unworkable.

"Directional EMP generator"? I wonder (1)if a directional generator could be made, (2)how far its range would extend, and (3)how much power/how large a power source would be required.


August 28, 2003, 12:22 AM
Silencers? Who needs em? Check out this old-timers article: (WARNING: don't try his handloads unless you really know what you're doing! I don't and haven't!)HOW TO HANDLOAD SUBSONIC RIFLE CARTRIDGES ( :D


Andrew Wyatt
August 28, 2003, 01:55 AM
John Ross: Could a solothurn be loaded with heavy 20mm bullets and silenced effectively? That'd make a hell of a gun.

August 28, 2003, 08:54 AM
OK, we're way out in left field now, Directional emp?? JShirley, you don't know how many times I've dreamed of a Compressed Aimable EMP for both the Horn Honkers and the mobile window rattlers. For the Horn Honker I usually stick my head out the door and holler, "Hey, why don;t you get off your fat lazy a$$ and walk up to the door and try knocking." But then, I do have a NRA sticker on my front door.:D As for the EMP! Well, it seems there are college students on this thread, and somebody talking about over engineering, I say, all you think tank types get your heads together and come up with with a feasible working model of Compressed, Aimable, EMP, sorta like a laser but not with light, with Electro Magnetic Pulse. Wouldn't hurt the people, (if the people who live under high power lines can be believed) but would wreak havoc on new cars electronics, like stereos, horns, etc, but also have the added benefit of virtually eliminating high speed chases by the po-po's by shutting down the electronic ignition. Who cares if the ignition is fried if we can save a mother with a baby carriage, stop a dangerous criminal from escaping, and I can get some sleep. (I am considerably older than you college types, and you will find sleep creeping closer to the top of your priority list, the older you get) Presumably, this laser guided, assisted or married EMP thread would have to be utilized wiyth some type of aimable "gun", so we are on the right thread for that, right? Brainiac engineers, go for it!! You'll be rich!!:p The only thin required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke

Art Eatman
August 28, 2003, 09:35 AM
Oh, argle-bargle! Can we get back to suppressors?


August 28, 2003, 02:06 PM
:D Art, are you being suppresive?

August 28, 2003, 02:17 PM
OK Art, you win. Back to suppressors. I think what we are referring to here are FLASH suppressors, not necessarily sound suppressors, (Which, by the way, are illegal in most states). Also known as Muzzle Brakes, can slip on and attach to the front sights, screw on to threaded barrels, and clip on using the sight pins. All depends on what type of weapon you're talking about. I've seen single and double, anywhere from $10 to $100, depending who you get them from, or for which type weapon. I've even seen them for a Mark II 22 LR. What would you need to suppress in that? The overly aggressive recoil or the enormous fireball flash? So, if you are talking about SILENCERS, I can't have em, don't want em, and would hate to have them used around me.

August 28, 2003, 02:28 PM
Muzzle brakes and flash suppresors, by law and function, are two different things.

August 28, 2003, 03:55 PM
I think what we are referring to here are FLASH suppressors, not necessarily sound suppressors, (Which, by the way, are illegal in most states).
Not illegal in Indiana.
So, if you are talking about SILENCERS, I can't have em, don't want em, and would hate to have them used around me.
You could have one legally if you wanted to. The state doesn't prohibit you. Just make sure that you jump through all the Federal hoops.

August 28, 2003, 04:17 PM
I recently shot in a carbine match where a fellow had a suppressed AR15. Even with standard (not subsonic) .223 ammo, it was surprisingly quiet - the "crack" of the supersonic bullet was less than I expected.

Well, this fellow confidently went through one of the stages - a "house clearing" stage with plywood hallways and such - without hearing protection. No problem . . . until about halfway through the stage when his carbine malfuctioned and he transitioned to his sidearm.

A .40 or .45 loaded with Cor Bon.

No earmuffs, surrounded by plywood walls that reflect sound . . .


BTW, I read that if you jump through the hoops to get a sound suppressor legally, and put it on a "post-ban assault rifle" you have a problem, as the BATmen consider a silencer to be a flash suppressor, and putting even a licensed silencer on, say, a post-ban AR15 would be "manufacturing an illegal assault weapon." (IF true - I don't vouch for its accuracy - this nonsense should go away in Sept '04)

August 28, 2003, 04:26 PM
Steve and I had a discussion about this a few months ago. I was of the opinion that a big heavy bullet is better than a lighter bullet when both have to be held to subsonic speeds. The problem (or so I have been told) is long range accuracy.
My choice for a suppressed, center fire rifle would be my AR15 upper in .458 Socom. I personally was not considering the idea of taking any shots outside of 200 yards anyway. In fact even with supersonic ammo, I wasn't thinking of shots more than maybe 200 yards away. But that big bullet would still pack a considerable wallop at whatever range it hit something.

August 28, 2003, 05:54 PM
Hank, what you heard is true. It is illegal to mount a suppressor on a post ban rifle.

If you enjoyed reading about "Suppressed Weapons....thoughts...." here in archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join today for the full version!