Rifled choke tubes?
rbernie
August 4, 2008, 09:02 PM
Anyone used them to good (or bad) effect? Tell all, before I plunk down $30+ on one to try it...
If you enjoyed reading about "Rifled choke tubes?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Dave McCracken
August 4, 2008, 09:39 PM
Yes. Number Two, my venison getter, has a rifled tube in during the season. With the slug of choice,1 oz KO Brenekkes, things run under 4" at 100 yards with the peep sight and good bench technique.
Jeff F
August 5, 2008, 10:36 PM
One of the best things they ever came out with for slug shooters. I really like the Remington extended rifled choke tube. And it doesn't do a bad job with the sabot slugs either although I have only shot a couple of boxes of the sabots.
VARifleman
August 5, 2008, 10:50 PM
Depends what ammo you want to use. I just use Brennekes and Remington Sluggers, so I don't need a rifled choke and am getting 6" center to center accuracy at 50 yards offhand. I have not tried them at longer distances or in another position yet.
Jeff F
August 5, 2008, 11:25 PM
If you get the chance to try one do so. I would be willing to bet that you would cut those groups in half if not better. Brennekes are my hunting load. I shoot a lot of the Remington's, Federals and Winchesters.
Der Verge
August 6, 2008, 10:39 PM
Of course, I have not tried mine with the Brennekes yet, though they are in the safe. N E Way, I have both an 870 and 11-87 both in 12 ga. The rifled choke tube in either gun has made no difference either way for Buckhammers, any type of sabot slug I have tried, or Winchester rifled slugs. Groups are lousy with any of the above. I think that the rifled tube is a crap shoot. It might, or might not. Guess that is why I only take the muzzle loader out anymore.
redneckrepairs
August 6, 2008, 10:48 PM
I dont see the point of them . I have shot groups that touch at 50 yards tho with a bead sight on an old 590 , my current 1100 does little looser if i do my part . They dont do a thing for accuracy imho , and dont do a thing for performance either .
Mannlicher
August 7, 2008, 09:25 AM
you won't regret spending the money if you ever get a chance to use that rifled tube on a hog or deer !
JNewell
August 7, 2008, 08:40 PM
My results agree with Dave's. Much tighter groups - highly recommended. BTW, I have also found that the FN SLP that is so-fitted shoots good buck loads about as tightly at 20-25 yards with the rifled tube as with an IC or Cyl tube. (In other words, the rifled tube does not degrade buck performance at reasonable ranges.)
f4t9r
August 7, 2008, 09:23 PM
I like them and they work well with the right ammo
Jack2427
August 8, 2008, 06:00 AM
Rifled "choke tubes" should be treated just like a rifled barrel. That is, you will get best results using sabot rounds through them-asssuming that the tube is properly sized for sabots. I have rifled tubes for my Winchester and Browning and FN shotguns. The tubes are properly sized and will give near rifled barrel performance out to 80-100 meters, depending on ammo/tube selection. The rifled tube extension, just like a rfiled barrel will "like" some brands of ammo betteer than others. Winchester Gold sabots seem to work well in my Browning and FN, but not my Winchester-strange considering the Winchester and FN are identical. My Browning is an A-Bolt by the way, and with its rifled tube it will shoot with my A-Bolt rifled barrel out to 90 meters, after which the rifled A-Bolt keeps on going giving rifle like accuracy to 170 meters. I guess the old saw, smooth bore/rifled slugs, rifled bore/sabot slugs still holds true.
JNewell
August 8, 2008, 08:34 PM
Could be, but the rifled tube made a huge difference for me shooting regular Foster slugs, so I'd recommend giving it a try.
If you enjoyed reading about "Rifled choke tubes?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.