Paper penetration to flesh penetration
Puncha
September 17, 2008, 10:54 AM
Mornin' Folks!
Owing to the dearth of penetration data out there for the .32 S&W long round, I have tried to conduct my own tests to see how much penetration could be had when firing at a range of 10 - 15 meters.
The problem is that I do not have the facilities or the means to make ballistics gel and it is very impractical for me to soak phonebooks for testing (pls just take my word for it ) hence, the only form of uniform testing that I have been able to do is to take plain ol' dry paper, tape it in a stack and shoot it for penetration.
My latest test indicates that a .32 S&W long 98gr wadcutter at 710ft/s muzzle velocity would penetrate 164 pages of Newsweek magazine at 12 meters.
My question is......are there any resources out there that can roughly estimate how many inches of dry paper penetration would equal ??? inches of penetration in organic tissue? (For example, www.theboxotruth.com estimates that 4 milk jugs of water equal 12"s of human BG.)
If you enjoyed reading about "Paper penetration to flesh penetration" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
hankdatank1362
September 17, 2008, 11:03 AM
You'd probably have to use a swimming pool to soak a Chinese phone book, they're so darn big!
*rimshot*
Okay, I know that was a bad joke, and you live in SE Asia, not China, but it was funny in my head.
AndyC
September 17, 2008, 01:06 PM
What type of tissue - muscle, bone, tendons, internal organs... ? Main problem is that they're all different, of course, which complicates your task considerably.
Funderb
September 17, 2008, 01:14 PM
why not make jello? you can shoot it, then eat it! If you like high carbon/lead flavor jello.
If you really want to explore this, I suggest an animal carcass.
NG VI
September 17, 2008, 01:50 PM
I don't think there is any real comparison.
krs
September 17, 2008, 02:18 PM
Imagining a big bowl of jello impacted by a .44 magnum HP........:D
Jenrick
September 17, 2008, 02:45 PM
The easiest way would be to shoot some rounds that have known penetration ranges in other media into paper and try to establish some constant or formula that relates them.
However most folks who shoot wet packs (wet newspaper), or water jugs just use a SWAG. Scientific Wild A** Guess. Basically "round X is supposed to penetrate about 12" in flesh/gellitan, and it blew through 6" of wet pack. Guess that means 6" of wet pack is equal to 12" of flesh."
-Jenrick
Phil DeGraves
September 17, 2008, 03:17 PM
Even ballistic gelatin is homogenous in ways the human body is not. When substituting other mediums that are not exact, resistance factors are compounded. A dense material like clay will cause expansion that human tissue won't, and paper will not cause expansion where human tissue will. The best you can do is compare rounds to each other shooting through the same medium, but this does not translate as to what it would do in tissue.
rcmodel
September 17, 2008, 03:45 PM
The only worldwide repeatable "standard" for the average man is water.
It is always the same everywhere, unless you use salt water and I use fresh water.
The same cannot be said about wet paper, dry paper, sand, dirt, mud, wood, or Jello.
rcmodel
Funderb
September 17, 2008, 04:46 PM
oh come on, jello would be totally epic.
Thernlund
September 17, 2008, 04:54 PM
See if you can get your hands on a side of pork.
-T.
Soybomb
September 17, 2008, 07:22 PM
There is no substitute for a proper gelatin test if you're actually using this to determine ammo suitability. Look for someone's results. For horsing around in the backyard fun, water will work but be overly biased toward expansion making it fairless useless as a real world performance indicator. Still fun though.
Loomis
September 17, 2008, 07:26 PM
Gee puncha, can't you go looking for a dead animal in a ditch somewhere? Shoot it in the hams and see if it passes through one or both hams.
RyanM
September 17, 2008, 08:37 PM
Dry paper makes bullets expand a lot more than jello.
One thing that will work is a bunch of containers, whatever you can get that are relatively thin-walled, filled with water. Line them up, and see how many the bullet goes through. Pop cans, cardboard cartons, plastic bags, etc. Bullets will penetrate water about 1.6 to 2.0 times as much as gelatin.
Mathematically, anyway, MacPherson's equations estimate a .312", 98 gr wadcutter at 710 fps will penetrate 16.8" in ballistic gelatin.
Treo
September 17, 2008, 10:22 PM
Oddly I get to check on this today, I disected a buffalo heart in A&P this morning, I managed to talk the instructors out of a heart.
I can say from experiance that at 15 feet a .40 S&W JHP will blow a pretty respectable hole in a buffalo's heart (given it doesn't have to go through the buffalo first) cardiac muscle is pretty tough I think it would give you a reasoable idea of how well your chosen round will preform.
Blofeld
September 18, 2008, 12:43 AM
Dry paper is a bad idea (done it), deforms most HP badly. Fragments smaller rounds consistently. Dry, paper is probably more unforgiving than most materials that you would think would be harder.
You mentioned the milk jugs, why not go with those?
Puncha
September 18, 2008, 10:40 AM
RyanM,
Can you direct me to a working website which has a calculator for Mcpherson's equations? I'd like to see the 16" penetration worked out for myself.
nicholst55
September 19, 2008, 05:16 AM
Buy a pig carcass and shoot it.
Funderb
September 19, 2008, 11:38 AM
i think the general idea is that when you shoot dry paper, you might as well be shooting wood.
Blofeld
September 19, 2008, 11:45 AM
+1 on that
RyanM
September 19, 2008, 04:54 PM
Can you direct me to a working website which has a calculator for Mcpherson's equations? I'd like to see the 16" penetration worked out for myself.
Unfortunately, no one has the equations or any calculators online. The book containing the equations and other information costs $53.95 USD total, for international shipping, plus any customs fees you may have.
http://www.firearmstactical.com/bulletpenetration.htm
CWL
September 19, 2008, 05:56 PM
Paper comes in different compositions, densities and weights. Newspaper, telephone paper, butcher paper, cardboard, copier paper, etc. all papers are different. They even differ by country and region.
conwict
September 19, 2008, 06:08 PM
You'd probably have to use a swimming pool to soak a Chinese phone book, they're so darn big!
*rimshot*
Okay, I know that was a bad joke, and you live in SE Asia, not China, but it was funny in my head.
That's okay, my first thought upon reading the title was "What caliber for the mailman?"
:evil:
Puncha
September 20, 2008, 10:39 AM
Funderb,
Thus, if I were shooting boards of wood, how much wood thickness would a .32 S+WL 98gr LWC be expected to penetrate at 10-12 yards? :) Thanks for the paper to wood comparison, I almost forgot that paper was essentially wood pulp.
To everyone else:
Can you guys give me a wood penetration estimation?
MCgunner
September 20, 2008, 11:05 AM
why not make jello? you can shoot it,
I use trapped hogs for the purpose. I mean, you gotta kill it before you eat it, right? Don't really prove much, but gives me confidence in a gun that can put a 150 lb hog down post haste. If you shoot enough of 'em, you'll find out that .38 works fine, .357 works better. Well, duh, I could have figured that one out on my own. LOL Don't have a .32. I don't know if I want to listen to the hog squeal and flop around that long, anyway, sorta what keeps me from trying the .380 on one, don't wanna be cruel about it.
lazyeye
September 20, 2008, 11:57 AM
160lbs Pig like the Illanois State Police. :D
Shawn Dodson
September 20, 2008, 01:14 PM
One method: Estimating Handgun Hollowpoint Bullet Penetration Using the MacPherson Water Test Method (http://www.firearmstactical.com/briefs5.htm)
Another method:A Simple Method for Testing Bullets with Your Guns
A quick and easy method to determine bullet or shotshell performance out of any handgun or shotgun is to gather several (and we mean several -- about 30) cardboard half-gallon milk cartons (plastic won't do).
Fill them full of water, line them up side-by-side three abreast, in three rows of 10 (each carton should be in contact with its neighbor). Back-up several feet and shoot a bullet from your handgun into the center row of cartons.
Count the number of water filled cartons the bullet penetrated, including the carton where the bullet came to rest. Multiply the number of cartons times 2.5 to determine penetration depth in inches. This will give you a SWAG (scientific wild-arse gauge) of how your gun/cartridge combination will perform in soft tissue (both bullet expansion and penetration).
The data obtained and averaged from three test shots should give you a fairly accurate SWAG. Remember to observe all safety rules when handling your firearm.
Finally, Fackler suggests an even easier method: a water filled container, such as a cardboard milk/juice carton, to produce bullet expansion, a box densely filled with polyester pillow batting to catch the bullet without damage, and a chronograph. Fire the bullet through the water filled container and recover it from the batting. Use MacPherson's book to determine penetration using velocity and expansion data.
Hook686
September 20, 2008, 01:42 PM
Steves pages
http://stevespages.com/page8f.htm
provides data on a number of handgun rounds fired into water jugs. If you did same, then looked for similar results you might get an idea of other handguns it compares to.
Then go to the terminal effects forum at the
http://www.tacticalforums.com/
, or similar, and look at the ballistic jello data for those calibers/cartriges and figure that your .32 long will be roughly equivilent to that data in ballistic gel.
If you enjoyed reading about "Paper penetration to flesh penetration" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.