P210-6 Range report (long)


PDA






doctorhumbert
September 9, 2003, 08:42 AM
Well, Today I made first ever trip to local indoor range with this brand new Sig P210-6. I've gotta say, this gun makes me look 'good'.

I didn't have enough time to buy good ammo, so I shot whatever they had (preferably cheap) at the gun range at a twice the cost of Wally world 9mm luger.

25 yards bench rested slow fire with Winchester FMJ 115gr 9mm (the cheap white box stuff).
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid78/p162f3a09d6acede8a0f5b4a3fb91f875/fb240213.jpg

The Best group
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid78/pbb24fcf645b59683441015acb7be4689/fb2401fd.jpg

I was aiming at the bottom of the black dot, so gun (and the ammo) shoots about 3" high and 1 1/2" to the left at 25 yards. Pretty impressive accuracy for a $5.99 a box ammo.

Here are groups by Remington UMC 115gr FMJ 9mm (the cheap yelow box stuff) :p
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid78/pa1bb7fc18c202006910d5a7994193bc5/fb240208.jpg
It's nowhere as accurate as Winchester, so it's hard to tell where the exact center of POI is on the target with this ammo. :(

I was very impressed with P210, particulary with Winchester ammo, with most of the groups near 1" in single jagged holes. Imagine what it could do with match quality ammos.

Now, I am wondering if the sights are off. As for the shooting high, the different ammo (especialy heavier 124gr) might bring down inch or too at 25 yards. Also it's probably zeroed to shoot X at 50 yards, thus it probably is shooting high at 'shorter' 25yards distance.
The real concern is wether gun is SHOOTING an inch to LEFT. Since I have such a repeating patterns as shown above, virtually copies of one another, it is unlikely that bad shooting stance is so consistant. But then again factory target shows group pretty much centered on the target.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid78/pfa3f202e2e817defe624646c7b206cbd/fb23f14c.jpg

Could it be the ammo then? :confused:
The front sight looks little off, could THIS be a problem?
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid78/pa34f74f47ad06659d354b77b98db9622/fb23f145.jpg
Though hard to belive from above shot groups, could it be me and my bad improper grip?

It would be helpful to do more shooting with 124gr +P nato spec ammo on this gun to find out its true accuracy, but until then your opinions would be appreciated.

If you enjoyed reading about "P210-6 Range report (long)" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
mete
September 9, 2003, 10:47 AM
Remember that POI of a handgun is very sensitive as to grip so I assume that that's the problem. It's been many years since I fired a 210, the three stage trigger takes time to get used to. The accuracy is there like my P7 but I'll have to remember to mention the 210 when people say the P7 is expensive !

Walt Sherrill
September 9, 2003, 03:26 PM
Re: three stage trigger?

What are you talking about?

Mine was a nice, crisp-as-the-best-custom-1911 trigger... Nothing to get used to. Finest SA trigger I've ever felt. (The P-210-"6" means "match grade trigger.")

Re: The front sight.

Yes, front sight being a bit off center to the right, like shown, could be causing the gun to shoot left. (When the gun is pointed straight at the target, with front and rear sight aligned, the end of the barrel is to the left because of its right-ward list.)

Try centering it on the barrel and bench rest it again...

If you're sure the shooting low is the gun and its not you, you can always take a little metal off the front sight. (A heavier bullet -- ala the 124 gr you mentioned -- might also help raise the point of impact a bit.)

I really doubt the problem is grip -- not with the consistency you're getting.

-------------------------
I had a P-210-6, which I sold to a list member a year or two ago. Mine shot to point of aim with 115 gr rounds -- and came with a proof target showing a 1 3/4" group at 50 meters (roughly 55 yards.) I could never shoot that, but believe the gun could!

It was a wonderful gun, but I needed a good used pickup .... and selling it helped with a LOT of the purchase price of the truck.

I shoot IDPA and didn't like being limited to 8+1 rounds. Further, trying to do a quick mag exchange with the european mag release was difficult... forget drop free. The gun was just setting in the gun safe, not getting shot. I drive the truck every day.

Sean Smith
September 9, 2003, 04:39 PM
It's been many years since I fired a 210, the three stage trigger takes time to get used to.

You are confused. No such animal on a factory P210. Just crisp SA triggers at around 3.5 pounds.

Peter M. Eick
September 9, 2003, 07:34 PM
I would guess your 3 stage trigger is due to the screw being loose in the tang. Mine -6 does that once in a while, but the -5 never does.

Nice shooting though.

mete
September 9, 2003, 08:54 PM
I shot the 210 some 30 years ago. And yes in those days they all had three stage triggers. Obviously they have changed. You make me feel old though the seventies are not the dark ages, are you all under 30 ?

doctorhumbert
September 9, 2003, 09:12 PM
No respect to 'elderly' but:
in those days they all had three stage triggers

I have 1954 P210/M49 DK which has single stage SA trigger. I've NEVER heard of three stage trigger, nor think there is any.

Erich
September 9, 2003, 09:28 PM
Man, you're making me very jealous. What a great report! Thanks!

mete
September 10, 2003, 12:09 AM
Old I may be but alzheimers hasn't set in yet. From "Cooper on Handguns" ,Jeff Cooper, 1974. "it has a three stage trigger the only one of its kind.First there is slack, then take-up,and only then a crisp release. This is disconcerting, and while no hinderance to deliberate shooting , it takes a bit of learning in rapid fire. "

QuarterBoreGunner
September 10, 2003, 12:13 AM
Old I may be but alzheimers hasn't set in yet

Ah... there is nothing that youth and energy can do that age and experience cannot undo.

Walt Sherrill
September 10, 2003, 06:47 AM
Old I may be but alzheimers hasn't set in yet. From "Cooper on Handguns" ,Jeff Cooper, 1974. "it has a three stage trigger the only one of its kind.First there is slack, then take-up,and only then a crisp release. This is disconcerting, and while no hinderance to deliberate shooting , it takes a bit of learning in rapid fire. "

I'm beginning to think Jeff Cooper had a "one of a kind" gun, and that your memory has been clouded by that article.

I've shot six different P-210s, and NONE OF THEM had a three-stage trigger. (Two of them were the [210-5?] model set up for serious international competition. )

The one I had, a P-210-6, bought new in '97 [but made in '78] was certainly NOT a three-stage trigger. It just broke after minimal takeup.

To make matters even more confusing, I've never heard "take up" described as a "stage."

I wonder if the one Cooper shot had the loose sear assembly that Peter mentioned earlier? One screw (on the tang) holds it in place. Take the screw out and the whole unit can be lifted out for cleaning or maintenance. If its loose, I suppose there can be slack and "play."

zeke
September 10, 2003, 06:51 AM
Have a Danish m/49 model, there are different stages to the trigger pull. The first stage takes up some slack (very short and light), the second takes back the hammer, and the third is extremely light and crisp releasing the sear.

This is slightly different from many European triggers, where final stage moves the hammer back fractionally before release (typical CZ). The second stage of the Sig trigger moves the hammer back noticably, but ya can hold it there for final very light stage.

This ain't a figment of imagination, but actual observation.:scrutiny:

Have no idea what modern 210 triggers are like, as never have seen one.

doctorhumbert
September 10, 2003, 07:46 AM
Ok.Ok. So it 'does' have three stage trigger.....:scrutiny:

Single stage, quadrouple stage, who cares? As long as it works.

I don't think I am pushing groups to left on my own. The grip pushing grip exactly 1" to the left every time? The groups are too tight and consistant for display of such human error.

I think the front sight needs to be recentered. I will see if they budge by tapping it with hard white nylon sight punch. If not I will have to either buy or borrow that $150 sight tool.

I also ordered some 124gr Geco (German) 9mm ammo. It should be able to shoot inch or so lower at 25 yards.

BigG
September 10, 2003, 08:01 AM
Nice pistol (and shooting) Dr.! You may be having a problem with your grip or trigger control to make the group off center. That Colt Browning type grip is not the easiest thing to master. (I know the pistol has Petter elements but it's a modification of the basic C/B design).

Did the P210 give you hammer bite? That's the worst thing I can say about my Colts and I believe the SIG will also bite.

BigG
September 10, 2003, 08:07 AM
...problem with grip or trigger control...

What I mean by this is not a GROSS problem, but a MINOR one of shifting grip between shots or shot strings. If you notice some of your groups are nicely centered in the black, some are left, some are left and high. This is more shooter induced than hardware, methinks... YMMV

doctorhumbert
September 10, 2003, 08:21 AM
If you notice some of your groups are nicely centered in the black, some are left, some are left and high

If it were, I too think it's the grip, but here are the pic of my groups at 25 yards again. Way too tight and consistant. All those targets will overlap on one another while still showing the same single hole. I have about 5 more targets with similar left shooting groups, but with flier or two.

I've never had problem with shooting grip on similar 1911.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid78/p162f3a09d6acede8a0f5b4a3fb91f875/fb240213.jpg

Thank you big G. The gun does gives me hammer bite. But it only draws little blood.:D P210 is such fun gun to shoot, you don't really notice it. I may try to put on a glove, but that may have effect on proper grip.

http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid78/p2d738a40d9dcacd1cd288e43469e4fc6/fb23eb9b.jpg

BigG
September 10, 2003, 08:25 AM
:D You go, Doc! :D

mete
September 10, 2003, 09:20 AM
Doc, you've been injured by your gun ? You better send it to me, besides I have to try a single stage 210. You youngsters should understand that first you have to learn stuff, only then will you have something to forget when you get old.

BigG
September 10, 2003, 09:23 AM
Doc, I just noticed your pic of the front sight. It's off to the right, as you noted. That would make the impact point be left. :eek: Looks like ya got a keeper. :D

Sean Smith
September 10, 2003, 09:34 AM
What Cooper described doesn't constitute a 3-stage trigger. Score another goof-up for the Soul Chicken. :rolleyes:

By his description of the SIG P210 trigger, 1911s have 2-stage triggers, which they don't. Cooper is just misusing terminology here... how ironic for such a linguistic masturbator.

zeke
September 10, 2003, 08:58 PM
doctor humbert-looks like your sites need adjusting for that load. My POI varies slightly for different loads, but some shoot slightly left (consistently).

Mighty nice pistol and shooting, might want to try the regular Win Q4172, which may shhot even better than the bulk packs. Most accurate factory load tried so far has been Fed 124 gn hydra-shock (standard velocity).

Awile ago bought some of the surplus wood grips and flattened the back strap, which alleviated most of the hammer bite. Was ready to dry small dab of silicone fill in the rear hollow of the hammer. The rear of hammer looks like it was designed to chisel.

Is that one of the newer heavier frame models? Two years ago found a heavy recoil spring assembly on internet, was worth it.

The p-210 is one pistol will never consider getting rid of, mighty nice trigger.

doctorhumbert
September 10, 2003, 09:02 PM
I have box of federal hydrashock 124gr in my cabinet. I will try them this weekend, and post pic of new groups.

I can't spare $150-200 on sight pusher right now:D . Does anyone have one I can borrow?:p

DBR
September 10, 2003, 11:37 PM
I bought my 210-6 as a shooter and not a collectable. I still wear the scar from the hammer. Probably the result of lots of high grip practice with Glocks and 1911s. So, I ground off about 1/8 inch of the hammer spur and no more bite. Still looks stock - I did a good job of it. Great gun!

doctorhumbert:
On my gun, the sights were easy to adjust with a brass drift punch.

doctorhumbert
September 11, 2003, 08:48 AM
Hmm. I don't wanna ding my sight with a brass punch. I have white nylon sight punch. I might try that.

Stephen A. Camp
September 11, 2003, 11:21 PM
Hello, sir, and kudos on your P210. They are very well made. Unfortunately, mine bites me, too. I'm not sure if the hammer is stainless or just finished in a matte hard chrome so I've not bobbed the hammer spur. I've found that a few layers of duct tape between the thumb and trigger finger help...for a while.

If interested, here's some observations on my P210:

http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com/Sig9mm.htm

Best and good shooting.

Walt Sherrill
September 11, 2003, 11:33 PM
A brass punch will not -- indeed, cannot -- ding your sight. The punch is too soft.

doctorhumbert
September 13, 2003, 04:17 PM
I am following up on the previous review with couple of different ammos in 124gr.

Here is my best groups at 25 yards supported with Geco (German) 124gr FMJ.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid79/p007d9d7932427abc9d420e7d73e52d74/fb1a0bd0.jpg
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid79/p323bba516cae42d2d56a0a83ae5cc5a3/fb1a0bcc.jpg
This ammo shoots slightly better toward middle, but not much lower at heavier weight. Pretty accurate.

Winchester white box 124gr FMJ at 25 yards.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid79/pf618f61ef168758fb0cb6ec42565f877/fb1a0bc8.jpg
This ammo was not as accurate as 115gr Winchester nor Geco 124gr. It still shoots left.

I like Geco 124gr, and supposably you can buy this ammo around $6-7 in bulk. Winchester 124gr is readily available in wal-mart, but I waited 20 minute to buy single box there today. I'd rather order Geco online. Since most of the shooting will be done at 25 yards, it looks like I need a higher front sight.

Does anyone know Which front sight (+. or +..) is needed to shoot 2"-3" lower at 25 yards with + front sight?

Walt Sherrill
September 13, 2003, 08:09 PM
What is your point of aim for these targets? Dead center on the bullseye, below the bullseye (at 6 o'clock), or some other position...

'Cause of its dead center on the bullseye, I'd be using the 6 o'clock hold and be happy. If you're holding on the 6 o'clock position and STILL shooting that high, then a sight change might be in order.

doctorhumbert
September 13, 2003, 08:37 PM
I am shooting 6' So its shooting about 3-4" high.

Walt Sherrill
September 13, 2003, 09:57 PM
If you talk to a gunsmith or a knowledgeable customer service person at SIG, and you tell them the specs (3.5 inches high at 25 yards), they can determine which front sight (or rear sight) you need. You may have to pull the one on the gun (or take a measurement), though.

doctorhumbert
September 13, 2003, 10:09 PM
It came with + size front sight. The two higher length sights available are +. and +..
I doubt Sig arm will provide me with replacement sight, but E-Gunpart store sells them for $40 piece:what:

zeke
September 14, 2003, 08:06 AM
doctorhumbert-might want ro try shooting off hand, after finding the load ya like. When sighting in pistols off rest, your poi sometimes changes. While every one is different, have most my pistols sighted in about 1 1/2 to 2 inches high at 25 yds benched. This usually results in poa=poi for me when shooting standing and un supported.

If you enjoyed reading about "P210-6 Range report (long)" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!