USA: WHAM-O, Inc. Files Suit Against Recently Released "Dickie Roberts'' Feature Film


PDA






cuchulainn
September 10, 2003, 07:09 PM
This is a very interesting legal approach, IMO.

Could/should gun makers do something similar with movies that depict their products used unsafely?

I'd have mixed feelings about that (free artistic expression and all), but still...

http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/index.jsp?epi-content=NEWS_VIEW_POPUP_TYPE&newsId=20030908005940&newsLang=en&beanID=2133606841&viewID=news_view_popupWHAM-O, Inc. Files Suit Against Recently Released ``Dickie Roberts'' Feature Film for Unauthorized, Unsafe Depiction of Its Trademarked Slip 'N Slide Toy Product

EMERYVILLE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 8, 2003--WHAM-O(R), Inc. the leading manufacturer of innovative outdoor fun products for every season, announced today that it has filed a lawsuit against Paramount Pictures Corporation and Happy Madison Productions for the unauthorized commercial use of its SLIP 'N SLIDE(R) toy and YELLOW WATER SLIDE COLOR registered trademarks in the recently released feature film, "Dickie Roberts," a violation of the Lanham Act.
"WHAM-O is concerned about the depicted misuse of its product in the film and its advertising, particularly the potential for injury to children and even adults who, after viewing the scene, might use the product in the same reckless manner," said Peter Sgromo, Senior Marketing Director of WHAM-O's Toy Division. "It goes without saying that Slip 'N Slide has become a part of the fabric of American Culture, as evidenced by its unwavering popularity among kids over its many years and, as such, it continues to be a natural fit for the entertainment industry when used to depict childhood outdoor fun. That said, it is of utmost importance to WHAM-O, that the entertainment industry seek and obtain permission to depict the registered trademarked product and its subsequent use in a manner that is approved by WHAM-O."

In the film, the title character, a physically fully grown adult, is shown injuring himself while recklessly misusing an uninflated SLIP 'N SLIDE YELLOW WATER SLIDE toy, which had not been connected to a water source, violating safety and usage guidelines as stated clearly and extensively on the product and packaging. These safety and usage guidelines limit its use to children ages 5-12 weighing less than 110 pounds, and under 5 feet tall. In addition, the guidelines explicitly state that the product must be inflated, wet and connected to a hose before use. Further, the instructions advise that users should also be wet before use. Failure to adhere to usage guidelines may result in serious or even fatal injury, the guidelines clearly state.

"Our commitment to the safety of our products complies with all mandatory safety regulations globally, as set forth by the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission, Canadian Ministry of Consumer and Corporate Affairs, American Society for Testing and Materials and the European Product Safety Commission," continued Sgromo.

In its petition to the court, WHAM-O seeks an injunction ordering Paramount Pictures Corporation and Happy Madison Productions either to withdraw the film or to insert appropriate disclaimers and safety guidelines in all current and future distributions of the film and film trailers.

<snip>

If you enjoyed reading about "USA: WHAM-O, Inc. Files Suit Against Recently Released "Dickie Roberts'' Feature Film" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Mike Irwin
September 10, 2003, 07:23 PM
Just heard on the news that a couple of years ago Whammo had to pay out $12 million to an idiot who paralyzed himself when he had an accident using a Slip&Slide.

Turns out he had been drinking heavily at the time...

Question is, even if there HAD been a warning on the box to the effect of "Drunken morons with IQs below the level of a garden slug should not use this product," etc., would the fool have been able to understand it in his besotted state?

Probably not.

Darwin is sometimes a very cruel master...

gun-fucious
September 10, 2003, 09:57 PM
listening to Ole Buzz Burbank today Mike?
;)

we had a slipnslide at a Labor day party last week

the disclaimers on the thing were quite extensive

Mike Irwin
September 11, 2003, 01:20 AM
"listening to Ole Buzz Burbank today Mike?"

DING DING DING!

All I can say is I'm glad I'm in DC where they'll still be on the air! I love those guys!

Triad
September 11, 2003, 05:12 PM
Could/should gun makers do something similar with movies that depict their products used unsafely?
I think Glock already did something similar. IIRC Gaston Glock was upset by rappers using the name in their performances and took legal action to have it stopped.

I think they should do it.

[EDIT] Isn't Buzz Burbank the news guy from the Don and Mike show? I liked listening to them, but thanks to KJFK it's been years since I've had the chance.

answerguy
September 11, 2003, 05:20 PM
I wouldn't think Whammos law suit will go anywhere. Although the movie does show the product being used incorrectly it also shows the results of incorrect usage.

Mike Irwin
September 11, 2003, 05:21 PM
Triad,

Yep, that's the show.

They've been fighting with their company over syndication for a long time. Apparently the company charges most radio stations about $10 a day to syndicate the show, to mainly secondary markets, and mainly on AM stations.

They're sorely pissed, so they were pulled from all syndicated markets today, and may not go back into syndication.

If you enjoyed reading about "USA: WHAM-O, Inc. Files Suit Against Recently Released "Dickie Roberts'' Feature Film" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!