[Andrew Wyatt]

If someone were to manufacture an Ar-15 stock adaptor that could use any ar-15 stock, was relatively inexpensive, and had a more suitably placed safety for pistol grip use, would you buy it?


Would you still buy it if you had to drill a hole in the rear of the triggerguard to use the adaptor's safety?

[Arkady]

Depends... is it ugly? :)

[Andrew Wyatt]

I don't know yet. ;)

[Min]

Cavalry Arms plans to come out with AR stock adapter for the Mossberg 500/590, FYI.

[Andrew Wyatt]

I knew that already. I am undeterred.

[C.R.Sam]

NO

Sam

[Cameron Lamont]

NO

Cam

[Andrew Wyatt]

are those No's because you don't own mossbergs and wouldn't buy one, no's because you wouldn't by one if you had to drill a hole in the rear portion of the triggerguard, or no, you wouldn't buy one, even though you have a mossberg?

[C.R.Sam]

No cause I don't like the concept.
Rather use the bucks on expending ammo in practice.

Sam

[Cameron Lamont]

I'm with Sam on this one.

Unless you are working on an entry team that requires transition between M16 variants and a Mossberg... what is the point?

I think looking cool is more about running a COF with a stock (stock) gun and doing it very, very well.

As I prefer the Winchester Defender for a defensive type shotgun, if I NEEDED a gun to aid in transitions to an M4 or AR I would simply buy the FN Police.

However, I am not on an entry team and the standard stock (after the 20,000 shells I have put through it) works well.

Buying more ammunition is the best way to become competent with a firearm, not adding the next most wonderful gadget.

After ammunition I would rather put the money towards a new Winchester Super X2 Practical...

C

[Garryowen]

Anyone who would like to see one, we'll have then at the next SHOT Show...

[Poodleshooter]

So....do I want a stock that solves the problem of poor safety location on my Mossberg due to the installation of the stock in the first place?
What was the benefit of this again?
I like my regular plastic stock.
Neat idea though.

[C.R.Sam]

Welcome aboard Garry.

Please pull up a chair and share with us.

Sam

[Andrew Wyatt]

The reason I think an AR stock adaptor for a spossberg should have a built in safety is the mossberg tang safety is only really accessable with a standard shotgun style stock. I suppose I worded the poll incorrectly, as i intended for it to be aimed at people who expressed interest in a mossberg adaptor on brobeebiter's thread, not necessarily people who don't own mossbergs.

An ar stock adaptor is not a replacement for training, and It was not my intention to state that it was.


In any event, the simplest way to do an ar-15 style safety (which is of merit, since the goal is to replicate ar-15 ergonomics) would be to have the rotary safety extend a rod through the rear of the triggerguard, which would necessitate having the trigger guard hole.

All i really wanted to know was if that was a deal breaker, and if i should persue other options.

[Garryowen]

Sam,

I've been a member of the site started from it’s start; I just never had anything worth saying. Every time I see a juicy topic, someone else beats me to posting what I wanted to say. ;) I didn’t mean to hijack this thread, but on this one, I'm a little more in "the know" then the average bear.

We're going to run an NRA shotgun class with the SST-870's in a month or so and work up a manual of arms for the system. We've already supplied them to some PD's (as well as a T&E request from the SEALs). We know the system isn't for everyone, but for the folks that have a need, we feel we have one of the better options for it.

[earl_simmons]

I'd buy one, but not if it included an integral safety. I don't really see the need to create a new safety - a slot could be cut in the adapter and a replacement safety button with an extension that protrudes through the slot could be used to access the safety mechanism.