Please compare H&K USP / S&W M&P


PDA






Chilean
December 22, 2008, 11:59 AM
Please guys, your info about this guns (both in .45 ACP), which is your favorite?, more reliable? accurate?

thanks

If you enjoyed reading about "Please compare H&K USP / S&W M&P" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
hags
December 22, 2008, 12:25 PM
Damn, that's a tough one!

possum
December 22, 2008, 12:48 PM
i believe that they are both plenty accurate enough, especially for defense. i say they are equally reliable, especially for the use of most gun owners, however i do think that the H&K might have an edge in some crazy torture test, but i can't say for sure as i haven't seen an m&p done like that.

i say get the m&p, reliable, accurate, and at a good price. for the extra money of the h&k what do you get? In my book for defense i could carry either one and be happy. i love h&k's but they are so expensive, and i have guns that serve just as well for alot less.

Thaddeus Jones
December 22, 2008, 01:09 PM
There is no comparison, IMHO. Apples and oranges.

The HK USP is a very well made, accurate, and supremely reliable pistol.

The M&P........feels good in the hand. :scrutiny:

jdh
December 22, 2008, 01:23 PM
Check this: http://mp-pistol.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=18139

hags
December 22, 2008, 03:05 PM
There is no comparison, IMHO. Apples and oranges.

The HK USP is a very well made, accurate, and supremely reliable pistol.

The M&P........feels good in the hand.

I disagree, the M&P feels good in the hand and is well made, accurate and reliable.

The trigger on the M&P is much, much better than the HK. The M&Ps I own have smooth take up and then a crisp, very distinct break.
I don't know where the shooter in the above article got his but they aren't like that now. The HK's is long and mushy by comparison.

For a cutting edge, quality, American made poly handgun I don't think you can do better from Austria or Germany.

Marcus L.
December 22, 2008, 03:12 PM
I still can't get over how crappy the DA/SA triggers are on H&Ks. Very unrefined design in comparison to a Sig or a CZ. Some don't mind it, but I just don't like it just as I don't like Glock triggers. The M&P on the other hand is one of the few polymer pistols that I actually like. When it comes to polymer pistols, I've owned a bunch, shot a bunch, and sold a bunch. So far, the M&P is one of the best overall polymer pistols out there right now in my opinion.

Jason_G
December 22, 2008, 03:15 PM
Both are great pistols.

It all boils down to whether you want a Glock-style manual of arms or if you want a more traditional manual of arms and an external hammer.

Both triggers are a bit different... the USP has a bit of overtravel and creep that you need to get used to. The M&P has a second hinge in the trigger that makes it feel a little "squishy" for utter lack of a better term. Both are very accurate once you get used to the triggers. The M&P had some issues early on with slides coming off the frame, and finish problems, but that seems to be well sorted out now. Both are excellent IMO.


Jason

hags
December 22, 2008, 03:19 PM
The M&P had some issues early on with slides coming off the frame, and finish problems, but that seems to be well sorted out now. Both are excellent IMO.

Jason,
I have not heard of the slide/frame issues, perhaps you're thinking of Glock?
Out of all the poly handguns I have seen the M&P has the largest bearing area between it's frame "rails" and the slide.

GrandmasterB
December 22, 2008, 04:38 PM
I much prefer the M&P. It sits lower in the hand and the trigger is much better IMHO. I dislike the high bore axis on all of the H&K USP line of pistols.

An H&K P7 is a different story though....:D http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=351333&page=2

flyboy1788
December 22, 2008, 05:27 PM
There is no comparison, IMHO. Apples and oranges.

The HK USP is a very well made, accurate, and supremely reliable pistol.

The M&P........feels good in the hand.

And plus the HK has that awesome logo on the side that enables you to be part of a super duper special elite club. :scrutiny:

Pilot
December 22, 2008, 05:31 PM
And plus the HK has that awesome logo on the side that enables you to be part of a super duper special elite club.


Can't afford one? :rolleyes:

flyboy1788
December 22, 2008, 05:38 PM
Can't afford one?

I cant afford anything right now...except for ramen noodles, but even if I could afford an HK, it doesnt mean I would get one. I dont like the elitist attitude that *some* people acquire when they buy one. Im sure theyre fantastic (my buddy has a USP and it is very nice), but a USP or HK45 is on average 400 more than the next closest polymer competitor. Do I think they are 400 dollars better than glocks or smith m&p's? Nope.

Marcus L.
December 22, 2008, 05:48 PM
Flyboy1788,

You might like this :D

"An open letter to the gun community from HK’s marketing department: In a world of compromises, some people put the bullets in the magazine backwards…But it doesn’t matter, because our gun is on the cover of the Rainbow Six video games. Look how cool that SEAL coming out of the water looks… If you buy a $2,000 SOCOM, you will be that cool of an operator too. And chicks will dig you.

At HK, we stuck a piston on an AR15, just like a bunch of other companies have done, dating back to about 1969. However ours is better, because we refuse to sell it to civilians. Because you suck, and we hate you.

Our XM8 is the greatest rifle ever developed. It may melt, and it doesn’t fit any accessories known to man, but that is your fault. If you were a real operator, you would love it. Once again, look at Rainbow Six, that G36 sure is cool isn’t it? Yeah, you know you want one.And by the way, check out our new HK45. We decided that humans don’t need to release the magazine with their thumbs. If you were a really manly teutonic operator, you would be able to reach the controls. Plus we’ve fired 100,000,000 rounds through one with zero malfunctions, and that was while it was buried in a lake of molten lava, on the moon. If you don’t believe us, it is because you aren’t a real operator.

By the way, our cheap, mass-produced, stamped sheet metal guns like the G3 and MP5 are the bestest things ever, and totally worth asinine scalpers prices, but note that cheap, mass-produced, stamped sheet metal guns from other countries are commie garbage. Not that it matters, because you’re civilians, so we won’t sell them to you anyway. Because you suck, and we hate you, but we know you’ll be back. We can beat you down like a trailer park wife, but you’ll come back, you always do.
Buy our stuff.
Sincerely
HK Marketing DepartmentHK. Because you suck. And we hate you.

I don’t know if you can tell, but I’m not the biggest fan of H und K. I posted that letter on THR a long time ago as a joke, but it sure did manage to tick a lot of people off. Ironically, the tag line, HK. Because you suck. And we hate you, has been popping up in various places ever since.

Sure, they’re decently reliable, decently accurate guns, but they’re massively overpriced and overrated by legions of fan boys. One of the most frustrating things about dealing with gun people on the interweb is that folks tend to pick a brand, and then base some of their self-esteem on that brand. Kind of like rabid sports fans who feel the need to burn cars if their team wins, or loses, or they just felt like burning stuff. Say something negative about that team to one of those rabid fans, and you’re probably going to get beat up. Likewise, if you say anything negative about the Teutonic superiority of HK, people get mad at you.

Well, I love hate mail, so here goes.

For each of their wunder guns, you can get something else that costs a lot less, and works better, and has ergonomics designed by people that actually shoot. HK came about when some Nazis fled to Spain and built the Cetme. But Cetme doesn’t sound very tough, does it? So they went back to Germany and became H and K, and if you call it H and K, fan boys will get mad, and insist that it is HK, because manly Teutonic operators and Navy SEALs don’t have time to say the word And. So HK rose to prominence by building the G3, which is what the Germans call the Cetme.

Now the G3 is a decent rifle. It is a cheap, stamped sheet metal, battle rifle. It has terrible ergonomics, with a hard to use safety, (and this is coming from a guy with gorilla hands), and difficult to use charging handle. It is reliable, because of the roller locking bolt that destroys your brass, and recoils worse than other competing .308 rifles. The FAL smokes the G3, and the only reason the G3 exists is because the Germans were too proud to pay royalties to those uppity Belgians.

The G3 can be really accurate, if you weld a bunch of metal to the sides of it, stick on a nice barrel, and jack the price up $10,000. And no, that’s not a typo. The PSG1 is absurdly priced, and the cheaper version, the MSG90 is proof that if make anything absurdly heavy enough, it can be accurate.
There is a collapsible stock available, which is awesome, if you like getting hit in the face with a piece of rebar, which is what their $400 stock feels like when you shoot it. Germans must be tougher than we are or something.
Other stamped, sheet metal guns exist, but HK fan boys mock those as commie garbage. See, if you build a cheap gun, but it is from Germany, then it is superior, but if you build a stamped gun in the eastern block (a hundred miles from Germany) then it is commie garbage.

But what brought HK to international fame and the cover of Dick Marcinko books (for example, Rogue Force Delta Green Team 7 Ninja Force Alpha II: The beginning) was the G3s little brother, the MP5. Take a G3, shrink it, and chamber it in 9mm. At the time, CQB doctrine was to use 9mm subguns. Now the MP5 is a neat little gun. I have two. They work well, and if compared to the other subguns of the day, like the Uzi or the Mac, then the MP5 was a lot easier to use, easier to hit with, and was decently reliable.

The MP5 became famous when the SAS used them to kick the living hell out of some bad guys at the Iranian embassy. This was marketing gold, and HK rode the wave. Pretty soon everybody wanted an MP5. It was what all the cool kids were using. Soon every video game and action movie was filled with HK stuff. HK may have overrated guns, but they’ve got the best marketing department in the gun business, and they milked that fee cow until it was dry.

But the MP5 isn’t as great as people make them out to be. They still malfunction. (if you’re favorite gun hasn’t malfed, you haven’t shot it enough). The mags are hard to insert on a closed bolt. Safety still sucks. Most versions don’t have a bolt hold open. Honestly, if I had to get into a gunfight with a subgun, then I would rather have my PPsH.

HK long guns were mostly unobtainable to US civilians, primarily because HK hates the civilian market. If you don’t believe me, go talk to them at SHOT show, and watch them sneer at regular people. They can’t help themselves. But like all unobtainable things, like Ferraris, and super models, regular folks start to imagine these unobtainable things as perfection, when really they’re just an expensive car that spends most of its time in the shop, or a chick with mental problems and Bulimia. That’s what happened with HK. Their products took on this aura of coolness amongst the fans, that just isn’t real.

For example, go to any thread on the internet where somebody brings up “What is the Best Rifle EVAR!” and there is a poll. On the poll will be some HK long guns that 99.85% of the gun owning public has never seen, let alone shot, but those guns will have the most votes, because the HK marketing department told you how awesome they are.

Read up about the XM8 on most gun boards. According to the interweb, the XM8 is the finest combat implement of all time. In actuality it is a plastic AR18, that tends to melt, break, and is universally loathed by the Army staff that had to test it. It takes bizarre attachments, so no US accessories will work. They took the G36, which is basically a blah rifle, used by a handful of countries that don’t ever actually shoot people, and uglied it up so that it looks like the demented lovechild of Bloaty the Pizza Hog and a Super-Soaker.

Or the HK416. According to the internet, the HK416 is the best gun EVER! It is called THE AWESOME. Lightning bolts of coolness fly from the gun and smite your enemies with Teutonic fury! However you can’t have one, because you’re a civilian, ergo, you suck. And HK hates you.
The 416 is basically an AR with a gas piston, which has been done by like ten companies now, but somehow the HK is better, because it was on Future Weapons, and HK won’t sell it to civilians. In fact, a couple of 416s slipped out into civilian hands, and HK freaked out about it. There is no legal reason that 416 uppers can’t be sold, but HK despises regular people, and the idea of you having their long guns offends them.
You can get civilian HK long guns, once in a while, when HK feels like it, but they’re usually hyper-neutered and over priced. Hell, the last ones were actually grey, because you know, black is too dangerous, or something.
HK’s new subgun is the UMP. They tend to break. One of our local PDs traded all of theirs in after they broke all the stocks. Cool idea, because everybody loves .45, but bad execution.

HK’s flagship pistols, the USP line, are decent polymer handguns. They are extremely reliable, that is the plus side. On the down side, their triggers universally suck, but they don’t have to. HK likes to use a square peg in a round hole, (literally) that makes the trigger pull a lot heavier and grittier than it needs to be. Why? Beats the heck out of me. The USP series should be reliable, they’re enormous.

The most annoying thing about the HK pistols is how they cost almost twice as much as every other polymer handgun on the market. Somehow being made in Germany means the USP series is worth $800-$1000, when all of the polymer guns made within a thousand miles are $400-$600. Only most of those guns tend to have better triggers, are just as reliable, and are usually more accurate.

Then there is the Mk23. Which is huge, accurate, reliable, (which it damn well better be, since it is the size and weight of a Mini-14) costs as much as a used car, huge, and is universally despised by the SF that it is issued to. Talk to anyone that is in an SF unit. The Mk23s they’ve been issued sit unused in arms room. Did I mention that it is HUGE? But that’s okay, because the HK fan boys will explain that it is an OFFENSIVE handgun. (scratches head) whatever the hell that is supposed to mean.
They are reliable, but so is a $125 Makarov. Only the Mak has a better trigger.

I have two guys that I work with that have been to the HK armorer’s school. If you think I’m biased, you should talk to them. They especially love working with the Germans. One fellow was yelled at because he had two magazines clamped together on his MP5, because “NEIN! That is not the H und K way!” Even though he had bought the mag clamp from HK. When you ask why the original MP5 doesn’t have a last shot bolt hold open, they’ll yell at you and say, “NEIN! Why would you want your enemy to know your gun is empty!” Hell, Hans, I just want to know when my gun is empty!
One friend of mine took his personal MP5, and cut an extra notch into the collapsible stock, so it would be shorter for when he was wearing his armor, and also it removed the nasty wobble that all HK collapsible stocks have. It is an easy fix, and a no-brainer that the HK should have been doing for years. Fritz at the armorer’s school damn near had an aneurism when he saw this blasphemy against his ineffectual German gods.

Look, gun owning public, just because you saw it on Future Weapons, or read about it on the internet, doesn’t make it true. For the love of John Moses Browning, before you formulate super strong opinions about a weapon, you should have at least shot the damn thing first.
Do I have anything positive to say about HK? Yes, the sneer of disdain they give you at SHOT is priceless and entertaining."

-Larry Correia

flyboy1788
December 22, 2008, 05:59 PM
Because you suck. And we hate you, has been popping up in various places ever since.

haha, I can vouch for that:D

Marcus, you captured my feelings exactly. excellent post.

Then there is the Mk23. Which is huge, accurate, reliable, (which it damn well better be, since it is the size and weight of a Mini-14)
I thought the same thing when I shot my buddies USP 45. accurate-check, reliable-check, size of a mini-14-check. I thought the USP was enormous which I must say was a bit of a turn off. If it is that big, it damn well better be reliable. I have a ruger p89 which is disgustingly reliable. but it is a BIG pistol, especially for a 9. Also I payed 250 dollars for it used in "like new" condition. HK usp costs 750 more and has similar ergonomics and is ridiculously bulky. The HK45 is a different story. For some reason I really liked it when I held one at the gunstore. It is like a USP went on a diet and trimmed up in all the right places...but it still has the HK pricetag.

litework
December 22, 2008, 08:40 PM
I don't have an M&P and I do have an HK USP .45, so you can tell which one I prefer. My preferences have very little to do with reliability. I expect reliability from any top shelf firearm manufacturer. I am more confident in the striking ability of hammer fired pistols, but it's not enough to avoid striker fired pistols...I just watch the lube, especially in the winter.

I have a good collection of many different firearms and HK is not my favorite manufacturer, but I have carried a USP almost every day since 2004. When compared to other .45s, I don't think the USP is any bigger and it is definitely smaller than some full sized polymer .45s. Its trigger is fair. I would not say it's worse than either of my CZs. Why do I carry it and prefer it to the M&P? The USP has large working controls that are intuitive. The slide release is large and the magazine release is placed in an ideal location; I don't need to rotate my pistol to remove the magazine. The pistol stays on target. This is going to be the silliest reason you've ever heard to choose a USP over another firearm, but here goes...I wear gloves in the winter. Not the tactical kind either. They're big, comfortable and warm-and I'm not giving them up. The USP is the only pistol I own that has a non restrictive trigger guard and controls that are large enough that they do not prohibit shooting when it's cold outside.

45ACPUSER
December 22, 2008, 08:48 PM
What fascinates me is that so many people try to turn a service pistol into tuned match gun. The USP is a hearty gun that is probably the most accurate of the handguns on the market today. You can not turn a HUMMER into a Corvette Z71......

I firmly believe that the HK USPf in 45 is one of the most accurate 45ACP handguns I have shot, and that is taking into account the trigger! The gun is like a Close-In Weapons System (CIWS)
with it's radar guided volley of ammo..

sumoj275
December 22, 2008, 09:43 PM
I have owned both. The M&P was ok, but I hated the trigger. My USP Tactical is great, reliable, accurate, and I can put my suppressor on the end. I guess it is up to you but for me I say USP all the way.

DocCas
December 23, 2008, 11:58 AM
I own both. An M&P .40 cal., and an H&K USP .45. Trying to pick which one I like best is like trying to pick which of my kids I love best!

Both are outstanding examples of excellent design, craftmanship, and materials.

Both are equally reliable and accurate. The M&P trigger is better than the H&K in double action mode, but the H&K trigger is better in single action mode.

I am very glad I don't have to choose between them. I like them both, equally, just like my kids! :)

woodfiend
December 23, 2008, 12:09 PM
I would take ANY HK pistol in ANY caliber over a S&W pistol in ANY caliber.

MyTFAL
December 23, 2008, 01:08 PM
I have a USP .40 and love it, I bought it used for 500 bucks. Anybody paying retail is a sucker and may deserve the raping they get.:what::what:

DocCas
December 23, 2008, 02:22 PM
woodfiend said, I would take ANY HK pistol in ANY caliber over a S&W pistol in ANY caliber.How many of each do you now own, how many of each have you owned, and how many rounds have you put through each of them?

S&W620
December 23, 2008, 04:03 PM
Owned both at one time.

I'd take the USP every time.

RobMoore
December 23, 2008, 04:28 PM
One you will get customer service with and one you won't.

hags
December 23, 2008, 04:58 PM
Ha,ha, my thoughts exactly.

S&W bends over backwards for their customers. On the other hand it is really difficult to get anyone over at HK on the phone.

I own both, I shoot both. I have larger hands and own a USP 9 LEM, an M&P 9and an M&P 9Pro all fit me pretty good. The HK has a larger grip but higher axis so there's more gun above my grip than with the M&P. This took some getting used to for me.

The guns perform identically as far as accuracy and reliability.
I prefer the M&P 9 Pro right now. In my opinion the M&Ps are more of a "shooters" gun. They point well, shoot well and have excellent shot recovery.
It took me a little time to "learn" to shoot the HK proficiently.

For the price you get the same performance with either. The M&P is much less expensive than the HK and arguably has better ergonomics.
If I had to choose, personally I'd rather send my money to an American company for a gun made in here in the U.S.
S&W has won alot of points with me with the M&P.

GrandmasterB
December 23, 2008, 05:05 PM
Ask yourself: How many USP variants are used by top competitors in USPSA or IDPA and how many use the M&P?

hags
December 23, 2008, 05:12 PM
Ask yourself: How many USP variants are used by top competitors in USPSA or IDPA and how many use the M&P?


Or you can go over to http://www.brianenos.com/forums/index.php?act=idx and do a search. M&Ps are all over the place.
Not alot of HKs to be seen.

Jason_G
December 23, 2008, 06:47 PM
Jason,
I have not heard of the slide/frame issues, perhaps you're thinking of Glock?
Out of all the poly handguns I have seen the M&P has the largest bearing area between it's frame "rails" and the slide.

No, not Glock. Definitely the M&P.

My Dad is a local LEO, and their whole department had to send their pistols back to S&W because the slides were flying off (I think forward when they would return to battery). They took care of it, but it would certainly suck to find out the hard way that your pistol has this issue.

Jason

hags
December 23, 2008, 08:18 PM
PM me the department, if you don't mind.

45ACPUSER
December 23, 2008, 08:22 PM
I have well over 45K thru my USPf 45. And, it is balls on accurate as the day I got it. I have a Jarvis bbl to shoot lead thru the USPf now, to help with lowering shooting costs.

ceadermtnboy
December 23, 2008, 08:35 PM
I think most people that do not like the M&P probably have not owned one. Most owners realize that the M&P is an improvement in poly pistols at a very reasonable cost. I am sure the H&K is a fine pistol and I could afford one, but why waste money? The Smith is just as good if not better in many ways.

Coronach
December 23, 2008, 10:10 PM
My Dad is a local LEO, and their whole department had to send their pistols back to S&W because the slides were flying off (I think forward when they would return to battery). They took care of it, but it would certainly suck to find out the hard way that your pistol has this issue.What PD, how many guns, and which ones?

My PD has about 2k officers and we have never had a single instance of this happening.

Mike

bpl
December 23, 2008, 10:46 PM
I have an HK USP Compact in .40 and a recently purchased M&P 9mm which I have not fired yet. I am honestly unimpressed with the HK. I may sell it at some point. It has been reliable for the few hundred round I've put through it, but the trigger sucks, the grip feels like a brick and it doesn't point well, IMHO. It also shoots low consistently, so it probably needs a new front sight. The M&P, however, feels great in hand and the trigger feels nice with dry firing. It also points much better for me. I also recently bought an XD-M 9mm, which is another nice looking and handling plastic pistol. I will probably not be buying another HK any time soon as they do not work well for me. Only you can decide if the extra money is worth it to you.

swwyo
December 23, 2008, 11:24 PM
Try this, we are not all built the same. Find a way to shoot both and your mind will be made up. In a way it takes out all the bias.

clang
December 24, 2008, 01:03 AM
"One of the most frustrating things about dealing with gun people on the interweb is that folks tend to pick a brand, and then base some of their self-esteem on that brand."

Sounds like some Democrats I know...

Jason_G
December 24, 2008, 01:30 AM
Some folks have asked that I post more details about the incident that I alluded to in an earlier post I made:

My Dad is a local LEO, and their whole department had to send their pistols back to S&W because the slides were flying off (I think forward when they would return to battery). They took care of it, but it would certainly suck to find out the hard way that your pistol has this issue.

Jason


All models that malf'd were 9mm, and to the best of my knowledge were only the fullsize models. This dept adopted the M&P while it was still very new, and the pistols that malf'd did so very early in their round count, so if you have a newer model, or if your M&P has been trouble-free for a substantial number of rounds, it ought to continue to be so. I think with my earlier post I accidentally raised unnecessary alarm with some folks, and I apologize for that.

FWIW, S&W replaced the entire dept's shipment of pistols, even though I believe many (if not most) were still unfired, in the boxes.

Hope that helps clarify things.

Jason

jburg61
December 24, 2008, 11:54 AM
When I chose my USPc .40, I did so based simply on the fact it fit best in my hand. I am very happy with the HK. I would buy another. I would also by a M&P if it felt good. Fondle 'em both, which ever one gets the biggest smile out of ya is the one.

alaskanativeson
December 25, 2008, 12:58 AM
I liked my USPc .45 enough that I bought a USP Tactical. For me the decision to get an HK was simply all about 2 things:

1 - Single/double action. I like to be able to fire sigle action if needed.

2 - My friend and gun dealer had a USPc available for $400.00. I wasn't going to say no, now I'm hooked.

That said, the M&P is a really good gun from all I've read. It feels nice in the hand though I haven't shot one yet. I have to say try each out if you possibly can.

gits
December 25, 2008, 04:31 PM
I owned a M&P9 before I sold it to my father. Don't get me wrong its a damn good gun. Pistol-training.com had like a 62k round torture test on the M&P 9. It performed pretty well. http://pistol-training.com/archives/998. But for me myself I shoot H&Ks a lot better than I did with my M&P. Your just going to need to get out there and shoot both. I heard so many good things about the M&P I figured I would pick it up as my first 9mm pistol. Unfortunately I was not very consistent with my shooting like I am with my HKs. Go out and shoot each gun and make your decision from there. But from my preference I'd go with the H&K.

Yositomo Wiskisito
March 9, 2009, 11:00 PM
"An open letter to the gun community from HK’s marketing department: In a world of compromises, some people put the bullets in the magazine backwards…But it doesn’t matter, because our gun is on the cover of the Rainbow Six video games. Look how cool that SEAL coming out of the water looks… If you buy a $2,000 SOCOM, you will be that cool of an operator too. And chicks will dig you.

At HK, we stuck a piston on an AR15, just like a bunch of other companies have done, dating back to about 1969. However ours is better, because we refuse to sell it to civilians. Because you suck, and we hate you.

Our XM8 is the greatest rifle ever developed. It may melt, and it doesn’t fit any accessories known to man, but that is your fault. If you were a real operator, you would love it. Once again, look at Rainbow Six, that G36 sure is cool isn’t it? Yeah, you know you want one.And by the way, check out our new HK45. We decided that humans don’t need to release the magazine with their thumbs. If you were a really manly teutonic operator, you would be able to reach the controls. Plus we’ve fired 100,000,000 rounds through one with zero malfunctions, and that was while it was buried in a lake of molten lava, on the moon. If you don’t believe us, it is because you aren’t a real operator.

By the way, our cheap, mass-produced, stamped sheet metal guns like the G3 and MP5 are the bestest things ever, and totally worth asinine scalpers prices, but note that cheap, mass-produced, stamped sheet metal guns from other countries are commie garbage. Not that it matters, because you’re civilians, so we won’t sell them to you anyway. Because you suck, and we hate you, but we know you’ll be back. We can beat you down like a trailer park wife, but you’ll come back, you always do.
Buy our stuff.
Sincerely
HK Marketing DepartmentHK. Because you suck. And we hate you.



ROFL

10-Ring
March 9, 2009, 11:27 PM
i have found HK's to be more consistent from sample to sample -- I have found S&W semi auto pistols to very greatly from gun to gun.
Give me an HK every time ;)

Boris Barowski
March 10, 2009, 11:57 AM
I like my HK, but really don't like the operator aura that surrounds the firm.

I fired the S&W too (only in 9mm tho) and i must say, i was quite surprised, it is actually a very good gun and it's very close to my USP. Still, for some reason (personal feel, sentimental value (first gun), ...) i like the usp better

D-Man
March 10, 2009, 12:38 PM
I currently own a HK45c and M&P45 full-sized model.

They both are great guns. I love the HK45c for the ability to carry in different ways due to the safety design, and I love the M&P45 for having a safety just like a 1911 does.

To me the big question between the two models (generalizing here) is should the H&K be about $300 more than the S&W? As much as I think the HK45c is a great gun, it's a tough call.

SwampWolf
March 11, 2009, 08:31 PM
Hope that helps clarify things.

Sorry, it doesn't for me. You said the "slides went flying off". How did that happen? Were the slide release or take-down levers shearing? I retired from a state agency employing several hundred le officers (all equipped with the latest Smith autos) and (though I wasn't privy to everything going on) I never heard of a single such incident happening. Which is why I'm interested in the details of the failures of Smith autos as recounted by you involving your father's le department. Can you provide more details and/or evidence as to what exactly was occurring?

Jason_G
March 11, 2009, 08:49 PM
Sorry, it doesn't for me. You said the "slides went flying off". How did that happen? Were the slide release or take-down levers shearing? I retired from a state agency employing several hundred le officers (all equipped with the latest Smith autos) and (though I wasn't privy to everything going on) I never heard of a single such incident happening. Which is why I'm interested in the details of the failures of Smith autos as recounted by you involving your father's le department. Can you provide more details and/or evidence as to what exactly was occurring?

Yeah. I spoke to my dad, and he said that the slides weren't coming off afterall. I don't know if it was me misunderstanding him, or him misunderstanding the other deputies whose pistols malfunctioned (his never did), and since this has been at least a couple of years ago he didn't remember either. The guns were not cycling properly, but no slides were coming off. He said he did not remember what the exact cause of this was, or if S&W even said what the problem was. His and several others never malfunctioned, but S&W took them all back anyway and sent (I would assume) new pistols.

Sorry about the confusion guys.

Jason

bondmid003
March 11, 2009, 08:52 PM
I love my USP .40, but then again I've heard alot of praise for the M&P and I've been eyeing one myself

JWJacobVT
March 11, 2009, 09:09 PM
It's simple for me. There is only one of the two that fits/feels good in my hand(s) as I shoot either hand.
The M&P feels great, the H&K does not. So for me the M&P 45, if I decide to buy one as I would rather have a M&P 10mm. But oh to dream.

Big Daddy Grim
March 11, 2009, 09:12 PM
Own them both love them both. The H&K is a little more accurate than my M&P .45.

f4t9r
March 11, 2009, 09:21 PM
I am the oddball here. I like the HK trigger better then the M&P.
The M&P's I have fired had a gritty pull and the HK more smoother.
I have noticed in a few other threads that one thing that is mentioned is to have the trigger worked over.

Coronach
March 12, 2009, 04:11 AM
The M&P trigger is gritty and "busy" when the gun is new. It gets better through simple use, an can be vastly improved with a trigger job.

Mike

HKIWB
March 12, 2009, 01:00 PM
I'd pick the M&P over the USP because it is smaller and more ergonomic, but I bought the HK45 instead of the M&P. I really liked shooting the M&P, and its size feels almost like a compact. However, my HK45 is more accurate, has a better trigger (SA, of course), and fits my hand even better. I had a FTF within the first 200 rounds of shooting the M&P, but that round also choked a 1911 we were shooting. My HK45 has been flawless in over 2,600 rounds-many of them reloads. The lower bore axis of the M&P didn't translate into any perceivable difference in my double taps compared to the HK45, but the M&P was noticably less accurate during slow fire. Overall, I think the M&P and HK45 are in a league of their own compared to the competition, and either one would be a great choice.

kwelz
March 12, 2009, 01:55 PM
I like the M&P better than the USP however I like the P30 better than than either.

7mmSTW
March 13, 2009, 01:16 AM
I have had a USP .40F for 9 years. Has been a very reliable weapon throughout that time and is my main carry as an LEO. I have some trigger time with the M&P as well. The M&P is easy to shoot well but I can't say I've had enough to qualify any statement for (or against) their reliability. They are probably pretty good but I got turned off from S&W auto's when I stupidly purchased a sigma along time ago...:scrutiny:...not the best of experiences. Had to send it back after less than 200 rounds....The HK I trust my life to...no small thing for me, it has proven itself to me time and time again.

Personally, I would buy the HK45 over the USP. Why buy the 90's design when there is a modern improvement of the same proven platform?

If you enjoyed reading about "Please compare H&K USP / S&W M&P" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!