Yet another reason to nuke australia.


PDA






Bigjake
September 24, 2003, 04:42 PM
http://www.abc.net.au/news/australia/sa/metsa-24sep2003-13.htm



:barf: :barf: :barf:

This just sickens me.

i think the only logical conclusion is to infect it with a virus that quickly and effectivly destroys these control freak politicians and all who support them. when we have determined it works there, its time to turn it loose in kali,ny, nj, & the supreme court building in ohio as a final test run before loosing it on the rest of the planet.

If you enjoyed reading about "Yet another reason to nuke australia." here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Bigjake
September 24, 2003, 04:51 PM
tongue firmly in cheek for most of the last post of mine. not wanting to offend anyone here. Really, what is the world comming to when they want to regulate reproduction??? I can think of a lot of folks that pry shouldn't reproduce, but geeze.

Keith
September 24, 2003, 05:52 PM
Hmmm, lets institute a license for breathing and deny all applications from politicians.

Keith

TallPine
September 24, 2003, 06:38 PM
"How is it that if someone wants to become a parent, you can have a child?" he asked.
Well, actually ... it's rather easy, people have been doing it for millenia with little or no instruction.

Mr Lewis ... you must have led a very sheltered life. :rolleyes:

Zedicus
September 24, 2003, 06:47 PM
O~k......
What's next over there, Outlawing food/water?:scrutiny: :banghead:

Moparmike
September 24, 2003, 08:05 PM
That is just plain retarded. Dont they do that in China already? They fine you heavily for having more than one child, they fine you a little for a girl, but none for a boy. Second child fee is less for a boy, more for a girl. *** is up with these people? Did the massive "Yellow Horde" that we were all afraid of 30 years ago go south instead and take over .au parliment?

F*&ktarded. Completely and utterly f*&ktarded.

keederdag
September 24, 2003, 09:09 PM
Wait a minut here guy's; maybe this aint such a bad ideer. If'n they aint gonna reproduce we'uns at THR cun go down thar and Kick @ss, un take over. I heard they got's gooood huntin and fishin. And I really likes their beer. Plus that dundee dude allway's sez they got lot's of barbie's. Heck I thunk she's a Hotie.:D :D :D :evil: :barf:

Kendra Pacelli
September 24, 2003, 10:15 PM
That is just plain retarded. Dont they do that in China already? They fine you heavily for having more than one child, they fine you a little for a girl, but none for a boy. Second child fee is less for a boy, more for a girl. *** is up with these people? Did the massive "Yellow Horde" that we were all afraid of 30 years ago go south instead and take over .au parliment?

Yes, it is regulated in China due to the over population. There have been cases when the second child has been removed from the home and "disposed" of....Now, I always thought that there should be licensing on having children, but only a thought due to some parenting these days...To actually do it is preposterous!:rolleyes:

benewton
September 25, 2003, 04:40 PM
Just can't resist....

Can't really support the idea that prospective parents must acquire liscenses,
since I'd then have to figure out the correct "authority".

But, lets make a deal...

You can have any number of children you wish, but you cannot, by any means, force anyone else to support them. No free "schools", no specific children's support facilities, nothing not purchased by WILLING parents or their supporters.
And I do mean willing: the old draft line of "I volunteer" or you go to jail doesn't cut it.

Nor do you get a pass from supporting your government, since your children will increase government costs. No deductions, and no tax cuts for merely having kids. If singles pay 20% on x dollars of income, so do you.

Finally, in the best libertarian fashion, while your children are, no doubt, the most important thing in the universe to you, they're merely another bump in the road to the rest of us, although a bit more annoying. Thus, skip the complaints against child limited areas, resturants, apartments, projects and so forth.

Considering what I see, and hear, these days when I simply can't avoid the contact, most of the current parents shouldn't be. 'course, I doubt that's changed much over the years...

mtnbkr
September 25, 2003, 04:45 PM
After seeing how some people treat their children, I can almost agree with it. There's some nasty people out there that should be steralized if not locked away altogether. :fire:

Chris

TallPine
September 25, 2003, 05:15 PM
I do sometimes wonder why God allows some people to have children.

But then ... I am not God, nor do I play him on TV.

Mr. Bombastic
September 25, 2003, 06:22 PM
After seeing how some people treat their children, I can almost agree with it. There's some nasty people out there that should be steralized if not locked away altogether.

But if someone is nasty enough to torture their children, will they be law-abiding enough to obey the licensing system?

telewinz
September 25, 2003, 06:50 PM
Working daily with the unwanted and uncared for children (grown to adult INMATES now) its sad to say but many males and females should not be permitted to create or rear children. Just talk to any social worker who has to deal with the ruined "leftovers" from this union. Our solution to the problem of putting the virgina and the penis in prison is too little too late. It will never happen but ask the kids/victims what they think.:( It really isn't that bad an idea. Do it for the children.

mtnbkr
September 25, 2003, 07:25 PM
But if someone is nasty enough to torture their children, will they be law-abiding enough to obey the licensing system?

No. That's why I said I could almost agree with it.

Chris

If you enjoyed reading about "Yet another reason to nuke australia." here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!