CZ-75B vs Springfield WW2 Mil Spec


PDA






Lightsped
October 7, 2003, 07:31 AM
So I have located both a CZ-75B (the green tactical version) and a Springfield Armory WW2 Mil Spec. Both guns are $379.00 each.

I am already familar with CZs as I have a CZ-97B. I also am familar with 1911s as I have a Kimber Pro Carry and a Colt 1991A1.

So which would you buy for $379.00 and why?

If you enjoyed reading about "CZ-75B vs Springfield WW2 Mil Spec" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
tiberius
October 7, 2003, 08:28 AM
It really depends what you want to do. Since you already have at least 3 .45's you clearly do not NEED a defensive pistol, so you just need to get what suits you the day of purchase.

That being said:

1. You have at least 3 .45's if you don't have a 9, get the CZ. Ihave the "Tactical" as well and really like it.
2. get both

Lightsped
October 7, 2003, 08:52 AM
I also have some 9mm guns including a 92FS, G19c, and AR-15.

Does anyone know if either the CZ-75B Tactical or the Springfield WW2 Mil Spec are limited edition guns? I saw alot of both at the local gunshow last weekend.

I think I am going to visit the gunshow again and pick one of these guns up. Just not sure which.....

Please advise.

Matthew_Q
October 7, 2003, 09:49 AM
You're in luck, I've got both!

If I had to choose between them, I'd get the CZ for a couple reasons. Accuracy and ammo cost.

They're both on equal ground as far as reliability so far. They're both very comfortable in my hand. I like both of their triggers (with the nod to the 1911 for short, crisp travel)

The SA is a little looser, and is definitely not as accurate in it's factory form (YMMV), but it's a GOOD 1911. RELIABLE as heck, and it looks nice in it's parkerized finish.

4v50 Gary
October 7, 2003, 11:06 AM
I'd go CZ-75B. Why? I don't have one of those yet. Mine is the earlier CZ-75 (with no import markings). Regarding the 1911, I must have almost a dozen of those (4 of which are left handed).

cz40va
October 7, 2003, 11:20 AM
Although I don't currently own any 1911's, I do own 6 CZs. I love these handguns.
Besides the 9mm being more econonical to shoot you can also get a Kadet kit for it . These kits make a great trainer and makes the CZ even more cost

efficient.

Gary

10-Ring
October 7, 2003, 11:39 AM
Go w/ the Mil Spec

DMK
October 7, 2003, 01:47 PM
Which do you like better/shoot more? Your 92FS or your 1991A1?

You answer there should help you decide.

Myself, I'd go with the CZ-75. Mine is my favorite range gun. Plus it would make a nice companion to your '97B.

PCRCCW
October 8, 2003, 01:06 AM
:rolleyes: :evil:

Shoot well

Chairman Meow
October 8, 2003, 02:17 AM
Well thats a silly question. Get both. :D But seriously if you can only afford one, I'd say the CZ-75 would enhance your collection more.

mummac
October 8, 2003, 02:53 AM
get the CZ. it comes with a Kershaw knife :D

zxc
October 8, 2003, 09:30 AM
can you say hammerbite? if so gettha CZ if not getthe 45.:D

Matthew_Q
October 8, 2003, 10:16 AM
Hammer bite is relative. I don't get hammer bite on anything, from a PPK, to a 1911 (with USGI style grip safety) to BHP to CZ75.

Chances are, if you get hammer bite on any of those, you'll get it on the rest. It's not the gun, it's YOU.

PCRCCW
October 8, 2003, 11:36 AM
Simple...If the gun bites you, bite it back harder :D

Shoot well

Kevinch
October 8, 2003, 12:14 PM
I dunno....since I only have a CZ-83 I'd probably go for it.....

IF IT WASN'T GREEN!

Personal taste, of course - OD green guns do nothing for me - but if that's what greases your hinges.....

If you enjoyed reading about "CZ-75B vs Springfield WW2 Mil Spec" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!