Smith and Wesson revolver choice


PDA






sprice
April 17, 2009, 05:05 PM
What should be my first revolver? Either a s&w model 27 or 29 is what i was thinking, what about you?

If you enjoyed reading about "Smith and Wesson revolver choice" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
JustinL
April 17, 2009, 05:09 PM
I would recommend the 27 as the .357 is cheaper/easier to shoot.

Duke of Doubt
April 17, 2009, 05:23 PM
Model 29 is a classic piece of art.

But ... your first revolvers? Dang, man; get a Colt Army Special or Smith Model 10 first.

almostfree
April 17, 2009, 05:30 PM
My 5" 27-2 is my favorie firearm and it's fun to shoot.

Zundfolge
April 17, 2009, 06:10 PM
First get the 27 ... then as soon as you can, go get that 29 (.44mag is just a HOOT!)

harmonic
April 17, 2009, 06:14 PM
Your first revolver? Dang, son, I'd take the money and buy two lesser expensive revolvers. Like, a model 19 and a model 17. The 19 lets you shoot 38 special and 357 and the 17, which is 22, is cheap to shoot.

If you buy a 44 mag and don't reload, you'll have to take out a loan every time you go to the range.

Iggy
April 17, 2009, 06:49 PM
What Harmonic said.

orionengnr
April 17, 2009, 07:04 PM
Harmonic--
Don't know where you shop, but I can't get an M-17 and an M-19 for the price of an M-27.

My M-17 cost me $450 (since sold and replaced with an M-18 for $400).
My M-19 cost me $450.
My first (6") M-27 cost me $450 (since sold).
My second M-27 (5") cost me $600 (within the last eight months).

If you can get a nice M-27 in a barrel length that appeals to you, I'd grab it now--they are neither plentiful nor cheap. You can shoot as many hot .357s as you want through it, or shoot light .38 loads (which is not necessarily true of the M-19).

I'd look for the .22 next, and shoot the daylights out of it. If you can find a nice M-19 later on, great. Can't see any advantage to the M-19 unless you're going to carry it (slightly smaller/lighter), and mine's too pretty to carry. I have a 586 for that :)

Racinbob
April 17, 2009, 07:15 PM
Since he mentioned the two he's looking at the 27 is a much better choice in my opinion. I agree with JustinL.

Deanimator
April 17, 2009, 07:41 PM
I had a Model 29 before I had a 27. Now I've got two of each.

Loyalist Dave
April 17, 2009, 07:45 PM
I like the model 13 myself for a first revolver, or a 65. I like to recommend fixed sights for new shooters is all I'm saying. The other variations, 19, 27 etc are also very good.

LD

jfh
April 17, 2009, 07:52 PM
I vote with Harmonic, I think--but the real issue would be whether or not the N frame (27, 29) is a good fit for your hand.

Be sure to try gripping the different frame sizes.

Jim H.

Clarence
April 17, 2009, 08:24 PM
I love the M29, but if its your first S&W I'd go for the M27.

351 WINCHESTER
April 17, 2009, 10:07 PM
My first revolver was a model 27. I purchased it in 1974. It was beautiful and shot like a dream. I had an 8 3/8" bbl. which was a mistake when I got a holster for it. Someone stole it from my truck while I was at work. I have a model 29 and it's about as good as revolvers get - it was made by real craftsmen in a time when they were made right. It wasn't cheap.

JWF III
April 17, 2009, 10:54 PM
I voted M-27. But shop the used market, and when you find one (either model) that speaks to you, at a price you're willing to pay, get it. Keep shopping around for the other.

Wyman

ArmedBear
April 17, 2009, 11:57 PM
27

.38 and .357 are unmitigated fun to shoot.

.44 is only fun for X rounds, depending on the rounds and the gun. Also, if you don't handload or plan to start, .44 has gotten far too expensive for most of us to play with a lot.:(

With any centerfire handgun, reloading is the next step if you really want to enjoy it (both dramatically lower cost and a much larger variety of loads, combined with really getting to know your gun well, lead to far greater enjoyment for the handloader IMO).

BCRider
April 18, 2009, 03:17 AM
I've found that my hand is good for about one cylinder worth of .44Mag. Meanwhile I could shoot a whole box of .357 without any issue.

I wouldn't turn up my nose at a nice tight and good looking Model 28 either. Granted it's a plain jane version but when you're peering over the sights and squeezing off a round the 27 and 28 look and feel the same.

Diggers
April 18, 2009, 04:10 AM
What is it for?

Just going to the range and secondly as an SD option....then the .357 for sure, with out a doubt.

If you intend to use it for more out doorsy type camping hiking backpacking activities then the .44 MIGHT be a better option depending on where you are.

.44 ammo is $$$$$. You will shoot way more with .38's

skoro
April 18, 2009, 05:39 AM
I'd get the .357 and use .38spl rounds for most of the shooting.

ChristopherG
April 18, 2009, 06:44 AM
Everyone's first revolver should be a .357. And everyone's second revolver should be a reloading press and components to load 5 or 10 or 20 thousand rounds of .38.

If you enjoyed reading about "Smith and Wesson revolver choice" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!