Shumer and Feinstein


PDA






HOME DEPOT GEORGE
July 20, 2009, 01:54 PM
Would discrimination/denial of civil rights be a valid argument for CCW using these two as an argument since they both have ccw's?

If you enjoyed reading about "Shumer and Feinstein" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
General Geoff
July 20, 2009, 03:22 PM
a CCW permit grants a privilege, not a right.


If carrying a concealed weapon was considered a right, you would need no such permit or license.

cuervo
July 20, 2009, 05:31 PM
New York (Schumer) and California (Feinstein) are both May Issue states. As GG mentioned, this makes a CCW a privilege in these states, not a right.

Now, if the 2nd is incorporated, who knows what future lawsuits may bring (but don't hold your breath).

highorder
July 20, 2009, 05:38 PM
Feinstein very publicly renounced her CCW years ago.

lobo9er
July 20, 2009, 06:05 PM
a CCW permit grants a privilege, not a right.

do you agree with that?

turbojohn41
July 21, 2009, 10:37 AM
not at all!

TexasRifleman
July 21, 2009, 10:54 AM
a CCW permit grants a privilege, not a right.

Only because we've allowed it to be that way.

But for the moment it's true unfortunately.

CoRoMo
July 21, 2009, 10:58 AM
a CCW permit grants a privilege, not a right.
do you agree with that?


Whether you agree or not, it's true. Permits are designed for privileges, not rights.
It's like a drivers license now, we have to take the class and then get our privilege card. It's wrong, but it's what has been accepted. Unfortunately.
When we accept the permit requirement, to exercise what was enumerated in the 2A, we allow the right to be issued/granted to us like a privilege.

If you enjoyed reading about "Shumer and Feinstein" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!