Question regarding different chamber sizes on Wingmaster
Ocaptainmycaptain
July 21, 2009, 07:23 PM
In my pursuit of purchasing a used Wingmaster I'm noticing that most of the guns I see online are chambered in 2 and 3/4 inches while only a handful come with the 3-inch chamber. Does this have anything to do with the age of the gun? Was there a particular year that the Wingmaster came out with the 3-inch chamber?
Because my intended use will be a combination of home defense and clay shooting, either sized chamber will probably suffice, although it would be nice to have the flexibility of the larger chamber if I did want to shoot 2 and 3/4 inch ammo.
Thanks in advance for any advice.
If you enjoyed reading about "Question regarding different chamber sizes on Wingmaster" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
DaleCooper51
July 21, 2009, 07:53 PM
For shooting clays and self defense, a 2 3/4" chambered gun will do fine. 99.999% of the shells I fire are 2 3/4". If hunting waterfowl, then I would opt for a 3" chambered gun.
Fred Fuller
July 21, 2009, 08:45 PM
The 870 Wingmaster Magnum (3" chamber)was introduced in 1955, 5 years after the 870 was first marketed. The serial number on 12 gauge 870s set up to handle 3" magnums end in M.
The standard 2 3/4" chamber will do fine, unless you want to go waterfowling or turkey hunting. If that's the case then you might want to hold out for an 870 Magnum.
lpl
ETA- and standard 12 ga. 870s set up for 2 3/4" shells have serial numbers ending in V. Forgot to mention that...
Ocaptainmycaptain
July 21, 2009, 09:10 PM
Thanks Lee and Dale.
I don't have any intentions of hunting water fowl at the moment, so the 2 and 3/4 inch should be fine. If I change my mind down the road, well I can worry about it then.
oneounceload
July 21, 2009, 09:22 PM
although it would be nice to have the flexibility of the larger chamber if I did want to shoot 2 and 3/4 inch ammo.
??????????
I'm taking it you meant to say 3" chamber?
As previously mentioned, except for turkey/waterfowl, 2-3/4 is plenty for upland and HD
Ocaptainmycaptain
July 21, 2009, 09:56 PM
No, what I was saying was that the larger chamber gives me the flexibility to shoot either 3-inch or 2 and 3/4 inch shells.
Virginian
July 21, 2009, 09:59 PM
Somewhere along the line (I'm thinking mid '80s but can't really remember) they stopped making 2-3/4" chambered non-target guns. Aside from the rollmarking, the only differences are the recoil pad on older 3" guns only, the chamber length, and the ejector and ejector spring.
22-rimfire
July 21, 2009, 11:58 PM
The other change that happened to the 870 was the use of the Rem choke (inserts) rather than fixed choke barrels. That happened in the mid-to- late 1980's or so. I don't recall exactly, but I bought a new Wingmaster in about 1979 with a modified choke. Also barrels were changed to be safe for steel shot as well.
turkeyhntr
July 24, 2009, 09:29 PM
If your firearm does not have a magnum receiver don't fire 3incn rounds in it even if the barrel states for 2 3/4 or 3inch. In some cases with used firearms these magnum barrels can end up on none magnum receiver.
Virginian
July 24, 2009, 11:01 PM
It is not unsafe to fire 3" shells, as long as the barrel says 3". The receivers are the same. 3" just may not eject cleanly from a 2-3/4" gun. I have actually seen quite a few older 2-3/4" 870s where 3" shells worked fine. I think Remington figured out people were magnumizing guns by going to 3" barrels, and started making sure the regular guns had regular ejectors, but I have no proof of that.
If you enjoyed reading about "Question regarding different chamber sizes on Wingmaster" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.