5" N-Frames?
Nightcrawler
October 25, 2003, 06:08 AM
Anybody have a 5" N-frame? How's it handle? How are the looks? Post a picture; the only one I recall ever having seen is the 5" 625.
Now, does anybody have a 5" N-Frame withOUT a full underlug? How does THAT handle and point? I'd love a picture of that, too, if at all possible.
If you enjoyed reading about "5" N-Frames?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Bullet Bob
October 25, 2003, 09:37 AM
Perfection (27-2) 5"
http://www.fototime.com/5F3CB629DD490A9/standard.jpg
Just feels right, to my hands.
Gunhamr
October 25, 2003, 10:35 AM
Mine is just like Bob's. A 27-2 with the exception of
the grips. Mine has Pachmayr Presentation. Also have
a four inch but usually pick up the five to shoot.
Five was Skeeter Skelton's favourite and also mine.
Ala Dan
October 25, 2003, 11:55 AM
Greeting's All-
I've got a newer Smith & Wesson 5" 629-5 .44
magnum "Classic" with the full under lug. Uncommon
as it may seem, fit and finish are perfect; with the
double-action being as "slick as a babys butt".
Best Wishes,
Ala Dan, N.R.A. Life Member
Avery Goodschott
October 25, 2003, 01:51 PM
I've got the 29-6 Classic in 5"....full underlug balances well and tames a bit of recoil
Agree with ALA Dan...best trigger of all my revolvers
Nightcrawler
October 25, 2003, 02:01 PM
I'm just thinking, you know? How would a 5" Model 57 .41 Magnum grab you?
Ala Dan
October 25, 2003, 02:12 PM
I would love to have a 5" Smith in .41 magnum.
Best Wishes,
Ala Dan, N.R.A. Life Member
BigG
October 25, 2003, 02:27 PM
No matter what length, they're like your children - I love em all!
Bullet Bob
October 25, 2003, 03:06 PM
I actually forgot about this one (hey - I just had surgery!) until the above two posts reminded me - 29 Classic 5" - excellent shooter:
http://www.fototime.com/EC56DFD43090294/standard.jpg
JoeHatley
October 25, 2003, 03:07 PM
Full underlug 5" 625:
http://www.iowatelecom.net/~hatley/625_3l.jpg
Performance Center 5.25" partial underlug 625:
http://www.iowatelecom.net/~hatley/625pc_l.jpg
Of course that extra 1/4" is inside the cylinder window.
Both gun handle the same. Outstanding!!
Joe
Tamara
October 25, 2003, 05:21 PM
5" Model 544 Texas Wagon Train Commemorative in .44-40.
(Nightcrawler, a 5" .41 would be so, as you put it, pedestrian. ;) )
http://www.thehighroad.org/attachment.php?s=&postid=481874
Nightcrawler
October 25, 2003, 05:58 PM
On the contrary! Since, to my knowledge, Smith & Wesson never made a 5" M57, mine would be rather rare, wouldn't you say? Certainly not worth much monetarily, but then, I only paid $350 for it in the first place. You can't pick up a new GP100 for that little around here.
I admit, I'm a little fuzzy on how exactly to use the term pedestrian in the snooty, artsy, I drink french coffee and watch Inside the Actors Studio, and use a Mac, kind of way.
However, it DID raise at least one eyebrow, didn't it? :D
Anyways, about that revolver you have pictured there. You don't often see double action revolvers chambered in bottleneck cartridges like .44-40. Does the low pressure of the round prevent any problems of the cartridges being pushed out of the cylinder (or whatever bad thing supposedly happens when you chamber a double action revolver for a bottleneck cartridge)?
See, I mostly want to get the 57 shortened 'cause it's muzzle heavy. The 25-5 doesn't have that problem, but the 57 just doesn't balance quite as well for me. (More metal to it than the 25-5, I would imagine.) I figure 5" would be a nice compromise between leaving it at 6" or going down to 4".
caz223
October 25, 2003, 08:33 PM
I have an older 5 1/2" 627 'model of 1989', full-underlug, and it balances nicely.
Interestingly, my L-frames currently outshoot it.
Maybe it just needs a little TLC from a good smith...
C.R.Sam
October 25, 2003, 09:20 PM
Straight bodied bottlenecks seem to behave more properly than taper bodied bottlenecks.
Sam
Standing Wolf
October 25, 2003, 10:23 PM
My model 27-2 left the factory with a considerably longer, but less accurate barrel than this one from Clark, which my friendly local gunsmith further modified. Five inches is a dandy length for a revolver barrel.
Tamara
October 26, 2003, 12:37 AM
On the contrary! Since, to my knowledge, Smith & Wesson never made a 5" M57, mine would be rather rare, wouldn't you say?
Yes, yes, but much like .44 Magnum, everybody and their grandmother has a .41 or .45 N-frame. To further your eclectic image, you should search one out in .44-40, .38/44 Heavy Duty, 10mm or .38 Super. ;)
Or get a Mateba; they don't come much more iconoclastic than that... :D
Tom C.
October 26, 2003, 12:52 AM
I have a Model 25-2 that originally had a 6 1/2" barrel that I had cut to 5". Love it! I think 5" is the ideal length for an N-frame. I also prefer the unlugged barrel. Balances better for me.
Nightcrawler
October 26, 2003, 01:52 AM
Iconoclasm has its limits; .41 Mag is expensive enough, thank you, without trying to scrape together .44-40.
And not everybody has a .41 or .45 N-Frame; they musn't have been too popular, as Smith more or less discontinued them. The .41 lives on, though just barely. *shrug* Guess everybody wanted either a .357 or a .44.
Hutch
October 26, 2003, 11:30 AM
'Pig, what's with the diamond Magna's on a '75 model revo?
To answer the previous, I have a beautiful 5" M27-2 in presenation case, similar to the ones shown earlier, and a 5" full-lug M625. Don't care for the lug, but that's how they come.
shooter.45
October 26, 2003, 02:21 PM
Here is my 5" Performace Center 627 love this gun...:D
http://www.hunt101.com/img/065344.JPG
tex_n_cal
October 26, 2003, 02:55 PM
Silly me, I let a Classic 5" M29 get away earlier this year:fire:
I WILL buy a 5" 629 one of these years - a great size for full power .44's.
This is my 50th Anniversary M27, with its brand new "Combat Grips" that I scored off Ebay. I have had them in the past for L frames, never have seen them available for N frames until this set.
The grips are a little too big for me, and also cover up part of the engraving on the right side - I am thinking of thinning them down, but if they are as rare as I think, I may leave them alone and get Herretts.
:D
http://www.thehighroad.org/attachment.php?s=&postid=567309
note to self - wipe of fingerprints before taking photos:p
Gunhamr
October 26, 2003, 08:47 PM
I had one of the 544 N Frame in 44-40 for a while and really
liked it. Had no problems with extraction. Let my friend talk
me out of it. Now I doubt if he is my friend anymore. I have
to do all my 44-40 shooting with Peacemakers and Rugers.
Have a full set of 4 inch N frames in all calibers that S&W has
ever made. Shoot them all and enjoy it. Just turned 82 last
week so guess the grandsons will get them before long.
:rolleyes:
P95Carry
October 26, 2003, 09:07 PM
Oh <sigh> .... the 5" ....... perfection in an N-frame IMO. Used to have a M27 long ago and in the end just had to replace it - this the M27-2 first purchesed according to my documentation January 1977 ..... probably I suspect amongst the last of the 5" before they quit makin that length tube...... so ......
http://www.bedford.net/design/cb_gun2/m27-2_s.jpg
<sigh again> ....... it's a love affair. Shot it again today with concommitant ''grin factor''!:)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bluing is great BTW but ... film of CLP on this pic is not constant .... lacking a bit on bbl due to careless pre-pic handling!
JShirley
October 27, 2003, 01:22 PM
but much like .44 Magnum, everybody and their grandmother has a .41 or .45 N-frame
I need to talk to more people! :D
I like Inside the Actor's Studio! Where else can one listen to Sharon Stone
described how courageous you have to be to get naked on film? :scrutiny:
So far, I don't like full underlugs on longer bl revolvers. (3" bls and shorter are different.) I love my 3" 657, but it may be impossible to find a sweeter handling
pistol than a 4" Model 57. Byron has two, the bastard. :)
John
MiniZ
October 28, 2003, 11:28 PM
My common 625:
These freakin' N frames are addictive!
Tamara
October 28, 2003, 11:36 PM
Hmmm... That looks like a ramp front sight, which would make your 625 a "-2" Model of 1988, and therefore not too all-fire common after all. :)
Odessa
October 30, 2003, 06:56 AM
http://www.hunt101.com/showphoto.php?photo=64732&sort=7&thecat=998&password=
This is my "Custom Classic", a square butt, 5" barrelled, M629-3 in .44 Magnum. I have just ordered a set of wood Hogue monogrips for it - the square butt target grips hurt too much with full house loads! It is a nice size and complements my 5" M27-2 very nicely. Odessa
RWK
October 30, 2003, 11:21 AM
I have three five-inch S&W N Frames: two 627s and a wonderful, 30+ year old, P&R'ed 27-2. They are all outstanding revolvers, but the 27-2 is my "standard of comparison" for all handguns.
JohnK
October 30, 2003, 12:21 PM
Lots of 5" M27's there, and they do look great, I may have to get my 8 3/8" gun cut down to that one of these days.
But here's a 5", short underlug 45 Colt N frame to drool over. :) Rescued from a pawn shop, but unfortunately not before some yahoo butchered the front sight with a file <sigh>
Nightcrawler
October 30, 2003, 12:24 PM
COOL! I'm liking the unfluted cylinder, too!
If you enjoyed reading about "5" N-Frames?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.