a friend who was in the army as an aviation mechanic has told me about an axe onboard apache helicoptors basicly used for egress
ive searched the internet as much as i could and finaly i have given up and figured id ask you guys
has anyone ever seen one of these or have a picture of one
what he describes is a serated single bit axe with a pike on the oposing side
my reason for disbelief is two fold one can someone honestly tear through a choppers hull with an axe and two why make a propriatary tool when fireaxes are freely available on the market
any help will be appreciated
If you enjoyed reading about "need some verification" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
MikeJackmin
September 9, 2009, 09:13 PM
I know that specially-designed axes were carried on WWII aircraft, and that similar axes are carried on commercial aircraft.
As to whether the Apache carries a crash ax or not, we'll need a helo pilot to answer that question.
Dimis
September 10, 2009, 03:02 PM
thanks a bunch guys im not an aircraft savvy individual so i didnt know if i should pull the BS card or not it just sounded fishy
7X57chilmau
September 10, 2009, 03:07 PM
Nah, most people overestimate the strenght of aircraft construction. The skin is really quite thin on non-armoured areas of an airframe.... Think similar to the door skin of your car, but aluminum, rather than steel.
J
theotherwaldo
September 10, 2009, 03:17 PM
Don't know if choppers carried an axe. I have chopped up aviation aluminum with a machete, though, to get interesting bits from stuff that was about to go to a smelter.
Easy to cut. Biggest problem was not mangling the interesting stuff in the process of removing it.
CWL
September 10, 2009, 03:33 PM
I do wonder if Apache helicopter skins are thin enough to be cut thru with an escape axe.
The crew compartment is designed to survive against hits by SovBlok 23mm AA shells.
JESmith
September 10, 2009, 04:19 PM
Never flew an Apache, but crash axes were somewhat common in Hueys. They were a good tool to have if you went down in the jungle or heavy foliage. I personally prefer them over a machete, but that's my opinion. They could chop thru most parts of the aircraft as long as it was not too thick. Also excellent for cutting thru brush, webbing, lines, and anything else you tangled up in. I don't think they were ever part of a standard load-out but a lot of useful things tended to become part of a units' kit.
Your friend was probably referring to something like this, except with a lighter shaft:
http://www.edarley.com/finditem/8880?s=google&kw=rescue%20axe&_s_ref=T2mkD8e7S&creative=3097531828
7X57chilmau
September 10, 2009, 04:29 PM
Armour is much heavier beneath and in specific areas. Where it's not deemed necessary, the skin is thin.
A helicopter isn't (and can't be) a flying tank. It's gotta fly!
J
CWL
September 10, 2009, 06:30 PM
Armour is much heavier beneath and in specific areas. Where it's not deemed necessary, the skin is thin.
So how does one plan to have the right part of an Apache exposed for escape if it crashes?
Growing-up during the height of the Cold War, I know 2 people who worked on the design of the Apache helicopter, and yes, it is a flying tank.
7X57chilmau
September 11, 2009, 11:59 AM
I believe that in any aircraft crash, one simply hopes for a break!
By helo standards, yes, a tank.... By tank standards, nope.
J
If you enjoyed reading about "need some verification" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!