Leupold Illuminated M1 scopes - good or bad?


PDA






Zak Smith
November 5, 2003, 12:42 PM
I am looking for feedback on the Illuminated Leupold M1 3.5-10X scope, with illum mildot reticle.

Does the illumination work well? Is it distracting? Durable?

thanks
Zak

If you enjoyed reading about "Leupold Illuminated M1 scopes - good or bad?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
warrior23
November 7, 2003, 12:32 AM
Zak,Ive had one for about a year now.Its not bad and I havent had any problems with it but my only complaint is just the center dot is illuminated.If I were to do it over again I would look into another scope maybe the NXS line I believe their scopes have a full illuminated reticle.

Zak Smith
November 7, 2003, 01:25 AM
Thanks for the info, warrior23.

I have heard from some sources that the Leu M1/M3 Illuminated scopes will be tweaked this year into new designs.

I'm looking at a scope for a "match" AR-10, and the choice is probably an 3.5-10X Illum. M1, or the 4.5-14X50mm (both mildot).

-z

TechBrute
November 7, 2003, 10:17 PM
The Leupy is like half the size of the NSX, which may be a consideration. I opted for the Leupold on my LTR, and I've been very happy. Yes, only the center is illuminated, but do you really need anything else? I have a 5.5-22x56 NSX on a PSS, and it's quite a piece of equipment. It's got the R2 reticle and the illumination is indeed a masterpiece. For those that don't know, the reticle is actually laser etched into a lens, and the etching reflects the illumination.

ScottsGT
November 18, 2003, 09:44 AM
I bought a BSA Illumnated Cat Eye for hunting. In the evening the light is WAY too bright even on its lowest setting. I've never replaced the battery.

If you enjoyed reading about "Leupold Illuminated M1 scopes - good or bad?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!