Cartridge influence on gun choice
38snapcaps
January 20, 2010, 02:49 PM
Do you have any guns that you like not because of what type the gun is but what cartridge it shoots?
For example; one reason I prefer a .38 snubnose is because I like the cartridge, how it looks, and its history. I also find the .22 WMR appealing because it "just looks right". Actually I like the looks of any revolver cartridge better than autos, I think this is a direct influence on my preferring revolvers. There is just something extra cool about watching Clint Eastwood reload a Colt 45 more so than Bruce Willis slapping a mag in a 1911. For sure both are fun to watch.
The .22lr just doesn't do a thing for me, so I do not own a .22. I HAD a .380 for a while but that puny "bullet" wasn't anything to get excited about. A handful of .45 ACP cartridges just looks and feels so "American", it's one of the things I like about a 1911.
How about you?
If you enjoyed reading about "Cartridge influence on gun choice" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Mainsail
January 20, 2010, 03:00 PM
I bought a Taurus 85 because I had a box of ammunition left over from my AF days, we carried the .38 on the job.
MrBorland
January 20, 2010, 03:10 PM
I know this is a handgun forum, but the Marlin 1894C lever guns tend to be like that.
Chambered in .357 & .44 mag, many seem to like the idea of having a revolver and rifle that use the same ammo.
As I mentioned in a recent thread on the rifle forum, for serious use, the rifle and revolver optimally use different loads, so the shooter ironically would often end up with separate rifle and revolver ammo anyway.
slamfirev10
January 20, 2010, 03:57 PM
j-frame in 32h&r mag
20% more firepower than 38 spcl (6 shots vs 5) w/ roughly the same ballistics, better when i roll my own :D
slamfirev10
January 20, 2010, 03:58 PM
As I mentioned in a recent thread on the rifle forum, for serious use, the rifle and revolver optimally use different loads, so the shooter ironically would often end up with separate rifle and revolver ammo anyway.
good point
mokin
January 20, 2010, 04:07 PM
I bought my Glock 29 because I've wanted a 10 mm Auto since that cartridge came out.
rha600
January 20, 2010, 04:10 PM
Not sure if this is what you mean, but I bought a .357 because of the flexibility of being able to shoot .38special, .38+P and the .357 Mag ammo. I also like those calibers for home defense which is mainly what the gun would be used for.
fireside44
January 20, 2010, 04:18 PM
As I mentioned in a recent thread on the rifle forum, for serious use, the rifle and revolver optimally use different loads, so the shooter ironically would often end up with separate rifle and revolver ammo anyway.
True, but even having the capability of partial compatibility, such as using the same projectile, can be a serious savings.
BlayGlock
January 20, 2010, 04:25 PM
I bought a Taurus 85 because I had a box of ammunition left over from my AF days, we carried the .38 on the job.
Now that is good reasoning. You sir, are a genius. Im gonna try that one on the wife.
"Hunnie, I have a few boxes of this ammo but no gun to shoot them in. SO... I need to get one so that ammo doesnt go to waist, I mean with all of the ammunition starved people out there these days we cant let it go bad." lol.
I bought my Glock 29 because I've wanted a 10 mm Auto since that cartridge came out.
Ditto.
easyg
January 21, 2010, 08:02 AM
I bought a Taurus 905 snubbie just because I had never owned (or fired) a 9mm revolver.
As it turns out, I think that it's great!
More powerful than a .38 snub-nose, but much more controllable (and less painful) than a .357 magnum snub-nose.
cornman
January 21, 2010, 08:54 AM
I wont get anything in a .40
HGUNHNTR
January 21, 2010, 09:53 AM
I bought FN's FiveseveN because of the round. I would have preferred a different pistol, but currently it is my only choice.
rmfnla
January 21, 2010, 11:29 AM
I do understand.
I'm a .44 Special nut; don't ask me why.
I've probably had 20 different guns in that caliber (not including 4 or 5 .44 Magnums); there's just something about it that appeals to me.
Used to reload for it (and others) as well but I seem to do less of that since shooting is such an ordeal in Los Angeles.
Here lies Lester Moore
Four slugs from a .44
No Les No Moore.
MCgunner
January 21, 2010, 11:36 AM
I've always had a thing for the .357 Magnum. Fortunately, there's no lack of choices in firearms. I never bought a Coonan, draw the line at auto pistols for it, but I have a Blackhawk and two Taurus 66s (3" and 4") in the caliber and have owned others. I also very much like my Rossi M92 lever carbine in the caliber, kick but with .357s, .22 like with light .38s. The ability to shoot .38 loads is one of my reasons for liking the caliber, gives it versatility in the field. I've taken rabbits, deer, and hogs with .357 magnum handguns. I own other stuff, but I like .357 when it comes right down to it.
jbauch357
January 21, 2010, 11:45 AM
I tend to be a fan of the .357mag - this started early on because I was a horrid shot with auto's and my uncle had a GP100 he'd let me borrow/shoot regularly. Being able to shoot .38's out of the same pistol is also nice for target shooting - or loading into small frame .357's like the SP101 that can be a bit uncomfortable with full-power magnum loads.
huntsman
January 21, 2010, 01:26 PM
I HAD a .380 for a while but that puny "bullet" wasn't anything to get excited about. A handful of .45 ACP cartridges just looks and feels so "American",
I have to disagree I think both cartridges look "American" kinda like big brother little brother thing.
Do you have any guns that you like not because of what type the gun is but what cartridge it shoots?
yeah to some extent my .45, because it's a .45 and also not a 1911.
If you enjoyed reading about "Cartridge influence on gun choice" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.