Elite 3200 or Nikon Omega on an inline ML


PDA






bambam1723
February 27, 2010, 11:53 AM
I have a CVA inline muzzleloader that I am going to use for hunting.

I am between the Bushnell Elite 3200 or the Nikon Omega.
Both will be 3-9x40.
I do not want the BDC Reticle so don't take that into consideration.

Which would you choose and why?

If you enjoyed reading about "Elite 3200 or Nikon Omega on an inline ML" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
blairvt
February 27, 2010, 11:55 AM
I have an Elite 3200 on my ML. Rainguard works

bambam1723
February 27, 2010, 03:29 PM
I'm looking to buy one of these this weekend so I wanna get all the input possible.

Kernel
February 27, 2010, 04:26 PM
IMO you would be much better served with a lower power scope. Like a 1.75-5x32, 1-4x24, or perhaps even a non-magnified red dot scope. Proper magnification is a function of three things: target size, inherent accuracy, and maximum engagement range. Deer are huge, muzzle loaders aren’t pin point accurate, and their maximum effective range is short. Hence the desirability of lower magnification scopes, and the multitude of advantages they confer.

That said, I think the 3200 is the better scope.

mikewayde
February 27, 2010, 11:37 PM
I have a Bushnell Elite 3200 5x15 and I really like it...

If you enjoyed reading about "Elite 3200 or Nikon Omega on an inline ML" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!