[rogerjames]

I keep meeting people on this site that claim to be THR members but choose to post "anti gun" signs on their private property because... I can't explain their BS, yet they claim to be THR members. Can anybody explain this?

[cassandrasdaddy]

is it private property you don't understand? or is it the idea that a gun is not a magic talisman that confers good judgement and rational behavior to the one who cuddles it that escapes you

[rogerjames]

Will you step up "rellascout", and explain yorself?

[cassandrasdaddy]

i thought he did already several times. if i remember you right your position is your right to carry your gun trancends a property owners rights?

[Sunray]

"...choose to post "anti gun" signs..." Like what? 'No Trespassing'? That isn't anti-firearm. It's anti-riff-raff.
"...their private property..." That explains it.
"...Will you step up..." Suggest you step up and explain yourself(NOT YORSELF!). Personal attacks aren't allowed.

[Mags]

PM/Email the guy and stop these public attacks.

[Full Metal Jacket]

is it private property you don't understand? or is it the idea that a gun is not a magic talisman that confers good judgement and rational behavior to the one who cuddles it that escapes you


this sums it up nicely.

i can't remember the number of times i've been at the range and had a loaded gun point in my direction by some fool that's not paying attention. not cool.

[Zak Smith]

I am closing this thread because the top post does not contain an intelligible thesis statement and it's going downhill from there.

[BullfrogKen]

What this come to, four closed threads on the same topic?


That would be called a clue.