You Win A Life's Supply of .45ACP Bullets
Gary H
November 30, 2003, 10:28 PM
If quality FMJ and lead bullets were the same price, which would you use and why?
If you enjoyed reading about "You Win A Life's Supply of .45ACP Bullets" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
HSMITH
November 30, 2003, 10:33 PM
I would shoot Federal Match 185 grain jacketed semi-wadcutters. The best of both worlds.
ACP230
November 30, 2003, 11:01 PM
I'd take 230 grain FMJs because they work well in my .45 handguns and my subguns.
444
November 30, 2003, 11:24 PM
I would take the FMJ.
I shoot a lot of cast bullets. I shoot primarily cast bullets in revolvers. I have shot a lot of cast bullets out of my 1911s.
But, if I got a lifetime supply of free bullets, I would take the FMJs. To me, the performance between the two is pretty much equal. I never had feeding problems with either one. I don't shoot bullseye or any extreme accuracy sports; my guns shoot better than I can and prove more than adequate for my uses. So, I guess the only reason I would take the FMJ is because they are clean and reliable and require less work.
Kamicosmos
November 30, 2003, 11:57 PM
FMJ, no contest.
Mal H
December 1, 2003, 01:34 AM
Ditto what 444 said - every single word of his post echos my thoughts on it. Well, every word except for his signature; that would have to be "42" in my case.
Now, when can we expect the first delivery of bullets?
444
December 1, 2003, 02:01 AM
42 ?
Gary H
December 1, 2003, 02:11 AM
This is why I ask the question:
Star .45ACP 230gr. FMJ $58 + ship of $23-$24= $81/K shipped
LaserCast 230gr LRN: $77/K shipped
National 230gr LRN: $46 + $23 = $69/K shipped
Penn 230gr LRN: $46 + $23= $69/K shipped
Leadhead 230gr LRN: $44 + $23 = $67/K shipped
I've been using LaserCast. I like their quality and haven't had a major leading problems with moderately loaded Titegroup, but still harder to clean barrel than FMJ and more crimp sensitive than FMJ.
Star 230gr. JHP is only $7 more than FMJ and bulk orders can reduce bullet and shipping costs. Plated bullets don't make much sense in light of the pricing.
444
December 1, 2003, 02:19 AM
FWIW: You can get 1000 Remington 230 Grain FMJ bullets for $77 plus shipping.
Winchester 230 grain FMJ is $67.35
Gary H
December 1, 2003, 03:05 AM
So for $4.00 to $14 more than LRN, I can get a reasonable quality FMJ. I have read other post discussing the quality of the Star product and it seems that they produce a decent bullet. Another $9.00 and you get Winchester. Major group buy and you can probably cut those cost. So, short of rolling your own, why use lead?
444
December 1, 2003, 03:31 AM
One of the main reasons I used to use lead was because I was shooting 155 grain bullets. I used them in IPSC: I worked up a load that made major power factor but seemed to have minimal recoil because of the light bullet.
I also cast my own bullets and this includes 230 grain RN.
Back in the day, I used to shoot all lead in everything. I wasn't making any money and every penny counted. Since then, I have pretty much kept it up. I do load jacketed bullets for super max loads, but still shoot primarily cast just because I always have.
The bottom line is that jacketed bullets cost more than lead. IMO they offer no advantage what so ever. So why should I pay more for them and gain nothing ?
ACP230
December 1, 2003, 08:23 AM
The last batch of 230 grain FMJs I bought were pulled military bullets. They cost $50 per thousand. Golden West Brass Industries is selling new 230 grain FMJs for $55 per thousand.
GWBI advertises in Shotgun News, as do surplus dealers like Jeff Bartlett who sometimes have pulled 230 grain FMJs.
Mal H
December 1, 2003, 09:56 AM
444: "42 ?"
Sure, that's the meaning life, the universe and everything. ;)
(It's from "The Hitchhiker's Guide To the Universe".)
MoNsTeR
December 1, 2003, 11:43 AM
Zero 230gr FMJ's are $69/1k shipped. Less if you buy more. And if you buy a lot, Montana Gold are even cheaper. At these prices, there's no reason to buy lead (though I imagine you can do better).
To answer the original question, I would shoot jacketed. Nothing worse than lube smoke, GAH! :cuss:
Edit: it's 42, not 47 :D
Mr. Chitlin
December 1, 2003, 02:14 PM
FMJ - I used lead for years shooting IPSC. They are nasty!! I hated handling them, and handling the loaded ammo. Since I started using FMJ's a few years ago, I'll never handload lead bullets again.
444
December 1, 2003, 02:27 PM
42 or 47, I never read the book either way.
http://www.nyfd.com/9_11_wtc.html
444
December 1, 2003, 02:47 PM
Or put another way.
Mal H
December 1, 2003, 02:47 PM
Of course it's "42", how odd that you would think I said "47".
[How'd he do that?!] ;) :D
I/We have hijacked this thread enough, I guess. Back to your regular discussion of FMJ vs lead.
BTW, that's pretty good, 444. I didn't realize what your number meant, but the links certainly give it meaning.
Gary H
December 1, 2003, 11:34 PM
Best I have found is:
http://www.southernbellebrass.com./match.htm
JimC
December 2, 2003, 06:08 AM
Winchester 230 gr. FMJ.
Poodleshooter
December 4, 2003, 05:39 PM
I'd rather have FMJ any day.
However, I wouldn't consider buying bullets and paying shipping for lead. I buy NBC and star brand lead for $36 per k at local shows. FMJ's cost me $60 per k minimum, or 2/3's more.
Unfortunately I just missed Widener's killer deal on Master Match (Star) FMJ's for $40 per k. They were all sold out by the time I called.
If you enjoyed reading about "You Win A Life's Supply of .45ACP Bullets" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.