Short Questionnaire Helps Identify Youths With Access to Guns


PDA






WAGCEVP
December 19, 2003, 08:21 PM
Short Questionnaire Helps Identify Youths With Access to Guns

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/466181


Laurie Barclay, MD
Medscape Medical News 2003. © 2003 Medscape




Dec. 19, 2003 — A seven-question screening tool may be reliable for identifying youths who have access to guns, according to the results of a study published in the December issue of the Southern Medical Journal.

"New techniques with which to identify youths who have gun accessibility are important for understanding and planning interventions to reduce the risk of injuries caused by use of firearms," write Leslie S. Zun, MD, MBA, and La Vonne Downey, PhD, from Mount Sinai Hospital in Chicago, Illinois.

Seven questions about gun accessibility, ownership, and usage were selected from a much longer questionnaire about access to guns, and both questionnaires were administered to 100 consenting subjects aged 10 to 24 years who presented to the emergency department for any complaint. Average age was 21 years, 39% were men, 66% were black, and 31% were Hispanic.

Answers to all of the questions in the short screening tool were statistically similar to those in the long questionnaire, and both instruments revealed a low number of gun owners but a high level of gun accessibility and availability. Two youths had a gun; four knew of a gun in their home, garage, or car; 38% believed it would be easy to obtain a gun; and 25% believed that getting a gun would be impossible. None of the youths had shared ownership of a gun. In the past six months, 8% had fired a gun, and 24% had fired a gun more than six months ago.

Study limitations include consecutive administration of both questionnaires during the same visit, a skewed study sample, lack of validation of the long gun surveys, limitations of the interview technique, the institutional review board requirement for consent, and potential falsification of answers for fear of legal prosecution.

"This short questionnaire could be used to screen large numbers of youths who present to a health care setting to identify youths who have access to guns," the authors write. "Screening of a large number of youths in the health care sector is the first step in reducing gun accessibility and, possibly, gun use."

South Med J. 2003;96:1238-1242

Reviewed by Gary D. Vogin, MD

If you enjoyed reading about "Short Questionnaire Helps Identify Youths With Access to Guns" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
7.62FullMetalJacket
December 19, 2003, 08:34 PM
[Study limitations include consecutive administration of both questionnaires during the same visit, a skewed study sample, lack of validation of the long gun surveys, limitations of the interview technique, the institutional review board requirement for consent, and potential falsification of answers for fear of legal prosecution.

:confused: So it is useless data?:barf: :scrutiny: :uhoh: :rolleyes:

This short questionnaire could be used to screen large numbers of youths who present to a health care setting to identify youths who have access to guns," the authors write. "Screening of a large number of youths in the health care sector is the first step in reducing gun accessibility and, possibly, gun use."

OK. Someone help me out here. Did YOU ask for their "help?" Cause I did not. I am still trying to find out the following:

1. The AUTHORITY to ask these questions,
2. The NEED to ask these questions.

geekWithA.45
December 19, 2003, 08:47 PM
It's junk science piled atop junk science.

One set of crap studies indicate that kids who injure themselves or others with guns have access to guns.

DUH.

Since injuries require medical or mortuary attention, it's then classified as a "public health problem".

Since it's a public health problem, they then feel obligated to DO SOMETHING about it.

So....let's figure out which kids have access to guns, so we can "intervene".

If you haven't already, check my responses to this thread on gunsafing kids...http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=55151,

in this thread, http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=51494&highlight=house+policy

and in this blog post: http://geekwitha45.blogspot.com/2003_09_14_geekwitha45_archive.html#106394472759797959

Standing Wolf
December 19, 2003, 08:52 PM
If I'd had children, they'd have had both access to firearms and their own guns at the earliest possible age.

Chuck Jennings
December 19, 2003, 11:13 PM
A good answer to any of these types of questions asked by a medical professional is:

“Doctor, I believe this question to be a boundary violation”

A boundary violation is a term in medical ethics that refers a class of ethical offenses that involve getting to close or personal with a patient.

Just about any doctor practicing today is familiar with the term, as doctors are required to attend seminars/workshops in medical ethics periodically in order to maintain their license.

By using this terminology, you would be sending a message to the doctor that you are aware of your rights, and that you are aware of the rules of medical ethics. Doctors that refuse to back off do so at their own risk.

There is a great article on this topic, as well as discussion of the tactics of various doctor related anti gun groups here:

http://www.haciendapub.com/article14.html

Malone LaVeigh
December 20, 2003, 02:05 PM
One gun store I go into now and then has a big sign on their gunsafe display that says: "KEEP YOUR KIDS SAFE. LOCK THEM UP." My son always gets a good laugh out of that, but I still don't know if the store owners are serious or not...

Unisaw
December 20, 2003, 03:39 PM
A consenting 10 year old? Give me a break! This is pure junk science.

If you enjoyed reading about "Short Questionnaire Helps Identify Youths With Access to Guns" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!