RCBS Pro 2000


PDA






General Tso
December 20, 2010, 09:33 PM
Why no love for the RCBS progressive? I'm getting ready to take the progressive plunge and I have been researching different models. It always seems like people are either Dillon or Hornady. I really like the idea of the primer strips with RCBS. What's wrong with RCBS? I can't find much info on it.

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk

If you enjoyed reading about "RCBS Pro 2000" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
griz
December 20, 2010, 10:09 PM
I like mine. I got one about 7 or 8 years ago and also like the primer strips better than the idea of stacking the caps in a tube. If I understand correctly, they now have auto indexing.

altitude_19
December 21, 2010, 05:22 AM
Yes they do, but be wary....the indexing is SHARP. Stumpier cases, like 45 ACP have a little powder jump out during auto indexing. Not such a big deal with taller cases. I actually went back to manual indexing, but still love the press, ESPECIALLY because of the APS system.

GW Staar
December 21, 2010, 12:41 PM
Why no love for the RCBS progressive? I'm getting ready to take the progressive plunge and I have been researching different models. It always seems like people are either Dillon or Hornady. I really like the idea of the primer strips with RCBS. What's wrong with RCBS? I can't find much info on it.

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk

First commenting on your first two replies. With this press you have a choice. Autoindexing or manual indexing. If you have a manual indexing Pro 2000 and you'd like to upgrade...its easy and fairly painless. Go to Midway or Grafs and order RCBS's Autoindexing Conversion Kit (http://www.grafs.com/retail/catalog/product/productId/14226). For a little over 100 dollars. Then you have the same press as a brand new auto-progressive.

As for "sharp" indexing, so is the Dillon 650. But there is a fix for both presses. I called RCBS about spilling powder during indexing, when I first got mine, and they sent me a spring that was way lighter and worked much better. I haven't spilled any powder using .45's, .40's, or 9mm's since. I'm betting RCBS has the new spring in the product nowadays...if not, rattle their cage and have the part in 4 days, free.

BTW the Hornady Bullet Feeder on the RCBS Pro 2000 Review Part 2 will be out in a few days. I'm more impressed with it than ever...for the price....and the simplicity...and the easily upgradable design.

As for the APS primer system we Pro 2000 owners (excepting the small segment who have no patience to learn a new, better way of doing things) love the primer strip system. Once you learn it....faster, safer, more convenient.

Why no love for the Pro 2000? It's not blue and doesn't say "Dillon" is the main thing. It's not as cheap as Hornady is the other thing. They don't use a case feeder is the last thing. RCBS, though they have the best customer relations in the business, they suck at marketing. It's as if the RCBS name ought to be enough...Dillon style. Dillon started the progressive market for amateur reloaders, and their entrenchment is old and deep. The RCBS name isn't enough...especially since RCBS's first attempts at Progressives sucked. The current product is excellent! It's every bit as good as the competition, with the one supposed deficiency, lack of a case feeder. For many that's the kicker. For me it was a plus.

You see, I change and load a lot of calibers way more often than a person who owns a Dillon 650 would want to go through their "change calibers" routine. Hornady's a little faster but they still have the complicated case feeders and tube-loaded primer systems. Caliber change speed is the real plus for the RCBS Pro 2000, that and the simplicity...never does anything "get out of sync" on a Pro 2000. Fewer parts...fewer things can go wrong.

HOWEVER the Pro 2000 can use a bullet feeder....and Hornady just released their new bullet feeder in the same spirit I like...simple and few parts. I bought one. I'm currently reviewing its use on my Pro 2000. Using it, believe it or not, will not measurably increase the already fastest caliber changeovers in the market...and if one uses CCI primers already loaded in strips...its even faster.

Dillon 650's are really hard to beat if you load one or two pistol calibers and want to load 5000 round batches very fast...their primer system is their only weakness doing that, but most get by fine if they're careful. They are slow for caliber change unless you buy a powder measure for every caliber you load...and even then they are slow changers compared to a case feeder-less RCBS Pro 2000. You don't want to use a Dillon 650 without a case feeder...ugh. You won't even find a picture of one without its very much needed case feeder.

Though Dillon folks are the loudest, biggest group, and some have been using them for many years before Dillon even had any competition, they aren't the perfect products hyped...no more perfect than Hornday's or RCBS's. All three brands are equal, quality products, just different designs that fit different folks with different needs. Research well for your own needs.

shooter_from_show-me
December 21, 2010, 04:25 PM
I too have a "Big Green" machine also and really enjoy it. The only hiccup I've had with mine for over a year now was a bent small primer plug assembly on the APS system. And I still don't know how it was bent, unless my 3 yr old boy did it when I was not around. But just a call to their customer service line and 4 days later was back in business, no questions asked.

Have a auto-indexing conversion kit as a Christmas present waiting for me Saturday. Now i'm looking for a bullet feeder to add to it. Speed wise I can load up around 300/hr in 9mm manual indexing and manual bullet feeding by hand. But I don't need a press that will pump out 1000/hr too. Like GW said about feeding it cases by hand is no big deal to me either. I've shot about 2500 rounds through my XD9 this year and maybe 2000-2500 of 38/357 and 44 mag total of 5000 in center fire pistol. So no need for a blue 650 or 1050 for me.

Get one that has the feature's you're looking for and leave it at that. But I don't think you'll be disappointed with "green" either.


Bill

Peter M. Eick
December 28, 2010, 07:39 PM
I think the reason there is no love is because most of us that bought the pro2000's have given up trying to convert the masses. It is hard to champion the underdog.

I have loaded over a quarter million rounds on mine and still like it. It has its quirks but I have figured out how to use it and run it well. I would replace it with another if I had to.

Walkalong
December 28, 2010, 08:24 PM
If RCBS would do a little advertising, or at least put some decent pics of it on their website, they would sell more.

GW Staar
December 28, 2010, 10:39 PM
I think the reason there is no love is because most of us that bought the pro2000's have given up trying to convert the masses. It is hard to champion the underdog.

I have loaded over a quarter million rounds on mine and still like it. It has its quirks but I have figured out how to use it and run it well. I would replace it with another if I had to.

Seems I'm one of the few who still make green noise. :) You're right though...I also am getting tired, trying to reason above the louder blue/red noise. And Walkalong is right, as I also mentioned above, RCBS's most serious flaw is product marketing. The O.P. couldn't do better than reading the famous to me, Peter M. Eick review of the Pro 2000 (http://www.handloads.com/articles/default.asp?id=26)! That article was the stimulus I needed, to look beyond the Dillon 650 with its "features" I didn't want to settle for. Thanks for that Peter! As for addressing the few Pro 2000 flaws, being the so very simple machine it is, they are quite simply, easy to fix, and I'm always willing to share the how-to with anybody.

Shawn Dodson
December 29, 2010, 10:52 AM
After researching RCBS, Hornady and Dillon progressive presses I chose the RCBS Pro-2000 and have been using it for about 10 years with zero issues.

I've used it to load .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP, .223, and 6.8 - all with very good results.

When I load rifle brass I usually size/decap on my (much) older RCBS Reloader Special II single-stage press - then trim case length (and swage the primer pocket on military brass with a Dillon Super Swage 900). After that I use the Pro-2000 to prime, charge, powder check and seat/crimp.

Sometimes when I prime military brass I encounter a problem with a primer snagging on a primer pocket burr (I feel increased resistance during the priming stroke). I'll stop, turn the case in the shell plate and try again. Many times that helps, sometimes it doesn't. When it doesn't I remove the problem case and use a deburring tool to remove the burr and put the case back into the shell plate. The deburring tool almost always solves the problem allowing me to simply use a priming stroke to prime the case and drive on.

I like the manual index feature for situations like that. I feel more in control when I'm recovering from an "out of sequence" problem (like forgetting to place a bullet in the case mouth, forgetting to put a fresh case in the shell plate, and priming issues).

I highly recommend the RCBS Pro-2000!

Peter M. Eick
December 29, 2010, 01:16 PM
Shawn,

You bring a good point that I never talk about nor does GW Staar (who in my opinion is the industry expert on the Pro2000 now). We never talk about pro2000 procedures.

One thing I do when I screw up, like get out of sequence, is I clear the plate. I fix the error I have made and then cycle the press till I have all rounds in progress cleaned off then I start again. I find that once you break the rhythm of progress that other mistakes are made. My common one is poorly placing the bullet since I am trying to minimize the belling.

Another procedure I use is to clean the plate with a puff of air down a straw after every 1000 rounds or so. This seems to help a bunch keeping the crud off the press.

Another procedure I do is to try and cycle the press the same way every time. This sounds obvious but if you work at it, your consistency improves on the powder drop.

Another procedure I use is to always scan my primers for anvils and primer charges. I have not found an error yet, but I do it every time.

I went to the progressive option and found that once you get it set up and worn in it works well. This also helps in my process of making ammo.

GW Staar
December 29, 2010, 04:22 PM
Shawn,

You bring a good point that I never talk about nor does GW Staar (who in my opinion is the industry expert on the Pro2000 now). We never talk about pro2000 procedures.

One thing I do when I screw up, like get out of sequence, is I clear the plate. I fix the error I have made and then cycle the press till I have all rounds in progress cleaned off then I start again. I find that once you break the rhythm of progress that other mistakes are made. My common one is poorly placing the bullet since I am trying to minimize the belling.

Another procedure I use is to clean the plate with a puff of air down a straw after every 1000 rounds or so. This seems to help a bunch keeping the crud off the press.

Another procedure I do is to try and cycle the press the same way every time. This sounds obvious but if you work at it, your consistency improves on the powder drop.

Another procedure I use is to always scan my primers for anvils and primer charges. I have not found an error yet, but I do it every time.

I went to the progressive option and found that once you get it set up and worn in it works well. This also helps in my process of making ammo.

Everything Peter says is important to take down, except that I'm any expert of anything....well ok ,I do pretty good at designing/building buildings. As for Pro 2000 expertise...not a chance. The word expert denotes experience...I bought my Pro 2000 exactly 2 years and 1 month ago. Peter and Shawn have been reloading on a Pro 2000 for 10 years....who's the experts? Now though I don't have any proof of expertise on Shawn, for Peter I do. See the picture below:

http://i935.photobucket.com/albums/ad195/gstrad/bucket.jpg

That was the third such bucket of APS strips he has collected and only at the 150,000 round mark....he's over 250,000 rounds of experience now. I'm a part-timer compared to these boys. I've done a few minor mods to make the Pro 2000 sing sweeter and faster, that's all.
Expert? No. Trying to make it a more fun press? Guilty.

So you can keep all those emails going to the real experts.;-)

On procedure, the mods I made, make some procedures a little easier. For example, say as the result a previous misstep, you end up with two sized and primed brass and a whole bunch of regular un-sized brass waiting to reload. I can push a knob in (stops primer advancement), and swing the shell plate stop in place (prevents the ram from pushing on a primer) and place one of the two primed bullets under powder measure, and stroke the press (no primer advance, no primer raising enough to jam). With the ram down again, place the second primed case under the powder measure, plus a regular case in station 1, and stroke the press. Now pull knob out and swing the stop back, push the press handle forward inserting a primer in the regular case, and insert a new case in #1. Now you're back in production.

This makes two of the minor but aggravating weaknesses go away...that is, if a primer strip is in place, the press will raise a primer every time (case or no case) and advance the strip every time...ready or not.;-)

Try fixing any of the Dillon 650's "features" with such simple trivial little mods. That's why simple is good...easy to fit it to you.

BigJakeJ1s
December 29, 2010, 08:00 PM
Does the Pro-2000 PM linkage allow expansion and powder drop in one station?

Andy

54lariat
December 30, 2010, 12:19 AM
I love my Pro2k I have the auto indexing feature. I press out about 500 rds/hr not even trying to, I check rounds and inspect one after every APS strip cycles. I love it


Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

GW Staar
December 30, 2010, 01:06 AM
Does the Pro-2000 PM linkage allow expansion and powder drop in one station?

Andy

Yes, but its undocumented by RCBS. That's what the cone shape on the bottom of the pistol drop tube is for. It's not that efficient, predictable, or as effective as hornady's, so RCBS just chose to ignore the feature. Besides, if you use it you have to move the Uniflow to the tool head station #2, which somewhat negates the stationary powder measure station advantage (at least on pistol).

I say somewhat, because you still don't have to buy a Uniflow or Hornady P.M for each caliber (Dillon 650 style) for quickest caliber change speed...you can just buy a powder die/lower clamp set for each pistol caliber, and merely lift the Uniflow or Hornady P.M out of one, drop it into another, and reset the mic!:cool: (I do use two uniflows with mics though...1 with the Large Drum, the other with the Small one...well, I had them...one came with my Rock Chucker 40 years ago, and the other came with my Pro 2000!)

Peter Eick pioneered the notion of using the PTX expander, powder die, and linkage from Hornady, to convert the RCBS Uniflow. It works like it was made for it. Hornady's PTX system works better because of the expanders that expand and bell rather than bell only like the RCBS one does. If you do a Google search, on Peter Eick and Uniflow you will find the article. I copied him...it works.

If you have and can use a metal lathe and can copy the shape of the Hornady PTX expander to a drop tube that fits the RCBS Uniflow, then the RCBS linkage would also work.

Hornady recently improved the PTX system with a clamp that is adjustable and prevents pressure on the P.M. using the PTX expanders. That and a slightly redesigned expander really made it work well.

A heads up...Hornady's new Bullet Feeder dies now include a PTX expander with the die!:)

I have my tool heads stored in clear plastic boxes from Walmart. Now, if I use the PTX system on my Uniflow, with separate lowers mounted on each pistol caliber tool head...and....now that I use the Hornady Pistol Bullet Feeder with its quick change feature, and can mount a bullet feeder die on each tool head, then I need to find a slightly bigger clear plastic box. Then my boxes will have my pistol tool heads and bullet feeder spring tubes/funnels! Get the picture? :cool: :D Pull a box off the shelf...change calibers in a flash...the Pro 2000 way!

earplug
December 30, 2010, 01:22 AM
Its safe, easy to use and reliable.
Of course the change over is easy. Checking rounds while in the press is easy and the Uniflow powder measure is dead nuts accurate.
RCBS is great at getting problems solved and broken parts sent out for free.
They just lack the pretty girls advertising.
That for the rest of the Internet.

Uniquedot
December 30, 2010, 01:42 AM
Does the pro 2k have an iron frame?

Shawn Dodson
December 30, 2010, 08:03 AM
Peter:

Speaking of procedures, I put together a caliber change procedure some time ago because there are times when I haven't operated my press for awhile. I use it so I don't have to rely on my memory to perform all the needed steps, to perform the steps in an efficient sequence, to have my "standard" load data conveniently available, and to have a consistent process for changing calibers. While it's tailored specifically for my purposes I modified it to post online to make it available to anyone who wants to use it as a guide for developing his/her own procedure. It's in Word 97 format and can be easily edited. See - http://www.firearmstactical.com/documents/rcbs_pro_2000.doc

I like your idea of clearing the shell plate completely when an out-of-sequence problem is encountered. You're right - breaking the rhythm does, many times, lead to other mistakes. I do have a handful of "recovery steps" I use but I haven't documented them. I'm getting ready to head out the shooting range right now, but I'll write them down and post them here in the next couple of days.

It appears to me that GW Starr is the expert of experts when it comes to operating the RCBS Pro-2000. That collection of primer strips is quite impressive!!!

Cheers!

joed
December 30, 2010, 09:02 AM
Back when I started looking at progressive presses I asked lots of questions to owners of the various presses. I figured the more info I had the better my decision would be.

The Lee owners were split. They either hated the press or loved it. From all the answers I got the things that stood out were the press needed a lot of tweeking and the primer system wasn't the greatest.

Dillon owners seemed very satisfied for the most part. I only heard one complaint and it was from someone that was switching to a Hornady LnL.

Hornady owners loved their presses. There were things that bothered me in their answers though. When I asked most how many rounds an hour they produced no one gave me an answer. I got answers of "I don't hurry" or "I like to take my time". Reading between the lines I reasoned that they were spending time adjusting things or having problems. At the time I looked at the LnL the steps of expanding the case mouth and pouring powder took 2 steps on the LnL, these were combined on the Dillon.

RCBS. My first press was an RCBS Rock Chucker. It has been flawless for 30+ years so I thought this was what I wanted. Figured it would be reliable. I couldn't find any owners with opinions on RCBS progressives. I keep in touch with an old ARMY buddy that lives on the West Coast and mentioned this to him. To my surprise he told me that he had owned an RCBS progressive since they came out. His opinion was to buy a Dillon. Couldn't believe I could only find one person that owned an RCBS progressive, so passed on it.

After hearing from all the progessive owners I eventually made the Dillon decision. I've now owned Dillons for 10 years and no complaints.

Don't know why you don't find owners of RCBS progressives, I've found their equipment to be among the best produced.

I'd really like to hear from RCBS progressive owners and what they think of their presses.

GW Staar
December 30, 2010, 12:45 PM
His opinion was to buy a Dillon. Couldn't believe I could only find one person that owned an RCBS progressive, so passed on it.


RCBS had some pretty clunky progressives years ago. Could be wrong, but I'm betting he never used a Pro 2000. Most Pro 2000 users seem to be quiet types. The press is so simple and trouble free to use once learned, that there's not that much to say, unless they tinker like me.:o

I almost bought a Dillon 650. I spent two loading sessions with it. It depends on what you load. Diversity is expensive...or slow with a Dillon 650 and a case feeder is mandatory to enjoy the press, since you load cases and bullets on the opposite side. I load a lot of different calibers. With a 650 I would want to buy a conversion kit with powder measure for each caliber. Otherwise I'd hate changing them. Plus I wasn't really enamored with the primer system. Great press...just didn't fit me and my budget.

RCBS's strengths are fastest caliber changes, simple (fewest moving parts to keep synced), and their super APS primer system. Safest for sure...and fastest if you spend an extra buck per 1000 and buy preloaded strips of CCI primers. Other brands of primers can be loaded in strips just as fast as pecking a tube full on a tube-fed. I loaded tubes for 40 years. Much prefer loading strips. I do like the Pro 2000...but, it ain't perfect, no press is, but I like how simple it is to improve on.

Up to now...if I was into national pistol competitions, I'd use a case fed Dillon 650...set up for one caliber. That's its forte...nothing faster...just watch out for occasional turned or upside-down primers. But now, with my new Hornady Bullet Feeder attached, the RCBS will probably give it a run for the money. Most of my reloading doesn't require that speed...especially rifle.

GW Staar
December 30, 2010, 12:48 PM
Peter:

It appears to me that GW Starr is the expert of experts when it comes to operating the RCBS Pro-2000. That collection of primer strips is quite impressive!!!

Cheers!

Okay you guys cut it out!! Read my post again...the picture and description of it was Peter's not mine! He's the expert of experts...I'm a 2-year amateur!!.

Does the pro 2k have an iron frame?

Yes...the only progressive that is. That's why its also the smallest one...aluminum presses have to be big to hold up.

Peter M. Eick
December 30, 2010, 09:07 PM
Yes the frame is cast iron. I have not weighed it but I would guess it is north of 30 lbs when you pick it up. It weighs a ton and is exceptionally stable and solid.

I have given away about one bucket full of primer strips over the year and now have 3 buckets full in the garage.

I buy my strips preloaded since I use CCI's and it works well. I have not had a problem with the APS strips. I think they are the best.


One question. Has anyone ever heard of a pro2000 user blowing a primer? Obviously you can't really blow more then one, but I don't see how you could even do one.

By the way, it occurs to me that my Pro2000 is 10 years old next month. I bought it in 2001 in January as I remember it. I need to pull the receipt and check that out.

J2FLAN
December 30, 2010, 10:18 PM
PRO 2000 --almost perfect, after 140,000 rounds and only 9 years of use a spring broke, I let RCBS know about that :D Great CS, sent the spring right out. This is one heavy-duty easy to use progressive, best powder measure and priming system out there. You don`t have to buy a spare parts kit for it, If you did break something they just send it to you right now, no charge.

Uniquedot
December 31, 2010, 04:15 AM
Yes...the only progressive that is. That's why its also the smallest one...aluminum presses have to be big to hold up.

I thought i had read this somewhere. I use the LM and have very few problems with it, but if i were to upgrade i would want an iron framed progressive...or it really wouldn't feel like an upgrade.

Peter M. Eick
December 31, 2010, 07:47 AM
If you want solid iron, then I believe the pro2000 is the only progressive press that is a full cast iron (actually steel) press. If I am wrong someone will point it out quickly though.

It is solid. Two hands to move it and make sure you watch the ram when lifting it around. If you change the balance point it will move on you.

joed
December 31, 2010, 11:30 AM
The Dillon 1050 is cast iron too which is one of the reasons I like it. Don't know why but I prefer the feel of a cast iron press.

Out of curiousity, how many rounds an hour is the Pro 2000 capable of?

Peter M. Eick
December 31, 2010, 04:13 PM
I generally don't go for speed as this is my hobby. When I am not bothered by family, and just cranking out standard rounds like 38's. I have clocked myself doing a consistent 650 rounds an hour with the progressive setup.

I am sure someone more dedicated could make it go faster but I am content with just puttering along.

J2FLAN
December 31, 2010, 06:27 PM
On my PRO 2000 I counted rounds for 20 min. going as fast as I could, while making sure every round was loaded right in each station adding a primer strip every 25 rounds--150 rounds-- so that would put it at 450 per hour. I am sure I could not keep that pace for an hour and still have each round perfect. That is not real fast but the finished rounds are better than I can buy;)

joed
December 31, 2010, 06:33 PM
450 rounds per hour isn't bad at all and I could live with that, I think my 650 may do 600 in an hour if I pushed it but I normally don't. The 1050 can crank them out all day long at about 1000 an hour with me working just a little harder then a leisurely pace. On the 1050 my arm usually gives out after an hour.

Maybe the next progressive will be the Pro 2000, I'll give it a look.

Peter M. Eick
December 31, 2010, 09:07 PM
What I have been trying to get RCBS to do is make a press that is a cross between the 1050 and the pro2000. You really need about 3 more stations so we could have 8 or 9 stations. It would be nice if a bullet and casing feeder were available. It has to keep the aps strips and uniflow measure. It would be nice if they made the uniflow work like I hdid with the hornady approach of flare and dispense.

We just need more stations!

joed
December 31, 2010, 10:31 PM
I see the RCBS has 5 stations, isn't that enough? I got rid of the Dillon 550 because it only had 4. The 650 has 5 leaving room for a powder check die. I won't run a progressive without that feature as I got burned by the 550 giving me squibs.

Peter M. Eick
January 1, 2011, 09:32 AM
No you need a bunch more open stations in my opinion.

I would like to do the following in terms of stations/die spots but not all need to be filled:
1) case feeder
2) universal deprimer
3) lube die
4) body or complete size die
5) neck sizer die or trim die
6) primer
7) expander
8) powder drop
9) powder check
10) bullet feed and seat
11) crimp
12) profile or FCD crimp

That is what I would like do do. what I could get by with:

1) case feeder/ universal deprime
2) lube die
3) body or complete size die
4) primer/ expander
5) powder drop
6) powder check
7) bullet feed and seat
8) crimp/profile or FCD crimp

Thus I have pushed RCBS to make either a 12 station or 9 station press. I think a 9 station with some flexibility would work out just fine.

GW Staar
January 2, 2011, 01:26 AM
No you need a bunch more open stations in my opinion.

Maybe you're right, but I'd be really jealous of a new proud owner of an RCBS Pro 2012 (fictional so far of course), that had the following improvements:

5 station tool head built around a stationary station 2. (so 6 stations total)
Powder through expander at station two for pistol.
Improved APS system that loads a coiled strip of primers as well as being back compatible with the strips used now.
Double tier feeder...one stand two collators for cases and bullets.
Bullet feeder feeds directly into a seater die. Both pistol and rifle.
Miniature video camera at station 3 that projects a clear picture of the case powder level to a screen at eye level. (They have these now that Model Railroad Hobbyists can mount to a tiny locomotive engine.)
And a "power" assisted press handle that makes cranking rounds super easy, yet stop cold (lockout die style) when too much pressure is required. (when something is wrong) and powers off during the primer insertion movement. Wouldn't Joed like that feature on his 1050!:)


Well shucks, if we're going to dream, dream!:)

450 rounds per hour isn't bad at all and I could live with that, I think my 650 may do 600 in an hour if I pushed it but I normally don't. The 1050 can crank them out all day long at about 1000 an hour with me working just a little harder then a leisurely pace. On the 1050 my arm usually gives out after an hour.

Maybe the next progressive will be the Pro 2000, I'll give it a look.

You commented about Hornady people giving you excuses. Well any press is slow when you start out and are trying to learn it...even your 1050. Many of these Hornady users are beginners. I consider myself still a beginner at the two year mark...mainly because I don't have the time nor the stamina to load the amount Peter does.

Also, some people will never push their progressives to top speed. Not sure I will. For me that's a factor of my limitations not the press's. If you haven't yet, look at my video using the Pro 2000 with some help from Hornady's brand new bullet feeder. Click the picture below to see it.

http://i935.photobucket.com/albums/ad195/gstrad/Hornady%20Bullet%20Feeder/th_LoadingwiththeHornady011.jpg (http://s935.photobucket.com/albums/ad195/gstrad/Hornady%20Bullet%20Feeder/?action=view&current=LoadingwiththeHornady011.mp4)

Observe: Three things limited speed in the video. First, it was my first 10 rounds using the bullet feeder, second, 61 year-old me with more than a touch of arthritis in the hands, and third, the Bullet feeder, because I hadn't figured out yet how to keep the bullet on board during a really fast auto-index. Only the second one will remain a factor...and I do much better in the summer time.;) One thing that didn't limit was the time placing cases in the shell plate....that is done during the priming stroke. (ok, except for the fumble-fingered one where I thought I had a bad case) You should be able to see that any young reloader will, with just a little experience, be able to knock out a very respectable speed...similar to your 650 using a case feeder. Shoot, if you count caliber changes and primer loading, maybe even faster. Faster yet if you build the $30 primer-out beeper I made for mine.

Question? Do you ever pinch or mash your fingers while you manually insert bullets in your 650?...especially when you are trying to set a speed record? That can never happen, if bullets are auto-fed instead of cases.

Peter M. Eick
January 2, 2011, 10:39 AM
Time and stamina? No just a frustrating job. There is nothing more relaxing then loading ammo or mowing the lawn. It is just so satisfying at the end of the day at work. My job can be very frustrating some days with no progress and no sense of motion. Loading ammo or mowing the lawn is a release because you can focus on a task, see it through and have something to show for it at the end of the task.

I figure I can't mow the lawn every day, I don't get enough exercise to justify alcohol as an out, so I make ammo.

Works for me.

BigJakeJ1s
January 2, 2011, 04:57 PM
A few thoughts on the ideal progressive press...

Tool heads and die retention

I'm not sure a stationary position for the PM is a good idea. Too many setups need it in stations other than #2. Particularly if you use powder through expanders that need to be swapped anyway. I like Hornady's LNL bushings on every station best (just want more of them!)

Indexing

I like the AP's smooth, half-step indexing. Being able to easily disable it would be a nice touch. I like the enclosed auto-indexing on the AP.

Shell plates and case retention/ejection

I like Dillon's and RCBS shell plate and sub-plate designs that are more forgiving of spilled powder, etc. by raising the case head off the subplate.

I like the AP ez-ject system (under the shell plate), but that means the case heads need to extend below at least part of the sub-plate. Spiral grooves could be milled into the sub-plate, each leading to "drain holes" that would route spilled powder safely out of the way. I think the EZ-ject may inadvertently improve operation in the presence of spilled powder, etc.

I like the Pro-2000 case retention system.

I like easily disabled case feeding (to allow manual case insertion) so that you don't have to set it up if you're only running a limited amount of that cartridge.

Spent primer handling

I like the AP spent primer system better than Dillon's. Not sure how Pro-2000 does it.

Priming

I like the Hornady priming shuttle, with one exception: the slot needs a drain hole at the end for stray bits of powder, etc.

I'm not sure whether I'd like APS or not, unless they had coiled strips or something like it. And a really fast semi-automated way to fill them with other brands of primers.

Other

I don't like combining bullet feed and seating die; it would limit the choice of seating dies too much.

I like the Dillon 1050 for its number of stations. Not for its complexity of caliber change-over.

I like the cast-iron frame on the Pro-2000 and on the 1050.



So, if I had a cast-iron, 8 station LNL AP with a sub-plate designed to handle spilled powder better, and RCBS case retention and coil-fed APS priming system, I'd probably be pretty happy with that.

Andy

General Tso
January 13, 2011, 04:49 PM
Well after thoroughly researching Hornady, Dillon, and RCBS, I ordered a RCBS Pro 2000. I hope I made the right choice. The cast iron frame and die plates and RCBS name sold me.

altitude_19
January 13, 2011, 09:14 PM
You're telling me...I don't anticipate EVER wearing mine out. Can't beat having the dies set and ready to go either!

Otto
January 14, 2011, 12:54 AM
Well after thoroughly researching Hornady, Dillon, and RCBS, I ordered a RCBS Pro 2000. I hope I made the right choice. The cast iron frame and die plates and RCBS name sold me.

Good choice, I already have a LNL but have been giving the Pro 2000 some consideration. Don't forget the $50 rebate that RCBS has going right now.

If you enjoyed reading about "RCBS Pro 2000" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!