Would These Guys Have Been THR Members?


PDA






AnklePocket
December 30, 2003, 07:02 PM
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-11/509634/DSCN0001.JPG

If you enjoyed reading about "Would These Guys Have Been THR Members?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
AnklePocket
December 30, 2003, 07:09 PM
I'll try it the easy way:

Brian Williams
December 30, 2003, 07:43 PM
Yep!
http://www.thehighroad.org/attachment.php?s=&postid=693528

geekWithA.45
December 30, 2003, 08:11 PM
Isn't that Skunky, the 3rd guy in the first row? The dude with the tactical tricorn?

El Tejon
December 30, 2003, 09:22 PM
No. THR members would still be at base camp arguing over caliber of the flintlocks--"I said .75 caliber! "No, .69 caliber."

However, are they advancing against the Bear Army? If so, then yes they are THR members.

seeker_two
December 30, 2003, 11:25 PM
Heck, they'd be MODERATORS...:D

(Oleg: you'd look great in a waistcoat & breeches like the leader has there...;) )

Preacherman
December 30, 2003, 11:32 PM
Geek, no, that's not Skunky - if you notice, the drum on his back isn't made of carbon fiber... :D

AZRickD
December 31, 2003, 12:11 AM
I dunno. Many of them were not particularly polite. Well-spoken of course (no public skools then), but they didn't shy away from letting the truth be known.

Rick
I smelt a rat.

Dorian
December 31, 2003, 12:39 AM
See the idiot in the third row waving at the "camera"

that was me... sorry :neener:

telewinz
December 31, 2003, 06:35 AM
talk about getting your clothes at the Salvation Army!:D Not a "black rifle" between them, is this pic before or after the renewal of the AWB?

RAY WOODROW 3RD
December 31, 2003, 09:14 AM
No telewinz,

This is the pic of what we had left to fight with because the majority of gun owners sat on their butts and did not fight for their right to keep and bear arms. It all went down like this:

When they came for the assault rifles, I did not protest because I did not have any.

When they came for the Hi-cap semi-auto pistols, I did not protest because I did not have any.

When they came for the evil bolt action sniper rifles, I did not protest because I did not have any.

When they came for the revolvers, I did not protest because I did not have any.

When they came for the shotguns, I did not protest because I did not have any.



AND FINALLY, when they came for my black powder rifle, I was standing all alone but with a few other black powder owners because they took everybody else away.

STAND UNITED MY BROTHERS.

Mark Tyson
December 31, 2003, 09:37 AM
Hey, look at the evil bayonets.

oldfart
December 31, 2003, 01:11 PM
Sorry, none of these could possibly be THR members-- There isn't a keyboard in sight!

oldfart
December 31, 2003, 03:04 PM
Hmm, it's been almost two hours. I must have struck a nerve.

Cool Hand Luke 22:36
December 31, 2003, 04:45 PM
"After viewing this picture I am truely appalled to see so many of the radical militia movement walking around in public with loaded military-style assault weapons. We need to pass a law."

-Charles Schumer D-NY

4v50 Gary
December 31, 2003, 04:49 PM
Why is the hammer/battery/steel/frizzen open on the musket of the man on the far right? Is he marching into battle with an unloaded musket?

BTW, THR members wouldn't be arguing over caliber inasmuch we would be arguing over rifles v. muskets. Of course, there'll always be a cheater who slips in a minie ball. Loads as fast as a musket, shoots as far if not further than a rifle. ;)

El Tejon
December 31, 2003, 04:56 PM
Gary, that man is a subscriber to a Colonial-era gun rag which stated that Condition 3 is much "safer.":D

BowStreetRunner
January 1, 2004, 01:45 AM
Gary my guess is that he has no ammunition
i mean, look at his clothes!
he is wearing an old car wash rag as a shirt!
the man has no hat, and no waistcoast (thereby leaving him nacked by 18th cent. standards)
but he IS taking the high road
:D

Delmar
January 1, 2004, 01:49 AM
They helped to make The High Road possible.

NorthernExtreme
January 1, 2004, 11:50 AM
They are not THR members. They had more conviction than most of us today. And a true willingness to make their position clear, and overt.

Not a flame on us, but something to think about.:uhoh:

AnklePocket
January 1, 2004, 12:08 PM
Yes, but rumor has it that the ratio of "us" vs. sheeple is the same today as it was in 1776. I've got a good quote about that, but I'm too busy right now listing stuff to sell on eBay to go look for it.

If you enjoyed reading about "Would These Guys Have Been THR Members?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!