New here still. Just got denied a gun after 5 days.


PDA






roperninja
February 9, 2011, 12:24 PM
Not sure why, but I called the store to check to see if I could go get my gun today and they said they havent heard back. 10 Minutes later they call back and say they just got the call and said it was denied. I bought a 1911 2 months ago, went through right away, nothing has changed that I know of.

What do?

What is the harm of waiting some time and just trying again?

Thanks yall.

If you enjoyed reading about "New here still. Just got denied a gun after 5 days." here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Varob
February 9, 2011, 12:26 PM
I'd inquire as to why I was denied?

OPtact4
February 9, 2011, 12:29 PM
Call them back and ask to call in the check again. Also, confirm they have the correct informations and didn't call in the wrong numbers.

RimfireChris
February 9, 2011, 12:30 PM
I believe you can call the feds and appeal, or at least find out why you were denied. I would, as if nothing about your legal status has changed that's odd to say the least. Also, did you put your SSN on the form? It's optional, and some people don't, but not putting it on can lead to the occasional foul up.

frieshoo
February 9, 2011, 12:31 PM
The same thing happened to a co-worker. She had bought a gun before Christmas with no problems. She was denied a week ago trying to buy a shotgun at Dick's Sporting Goods. She contacted a friend (VA State Trooper), and found out that there was a convicted felon with the same name living in the same county.

She is not sure that's the reason for denial.

ryanrichmond
February 9, 2011, 12:42 PM
The same thing happened to a co-worker. She had bought a gun before Christmas with no problems. She was denied a week ago trying to buy a shotgun at Dick's Sporting Goods. She contacted a friend (VA State Trooper), and found out that there was a convicted felon with the same name living in the same county.

She is not sure that's the reason for denial.

Would she not have been arrested at that point for attempting to purchase a firearm? I would imagine that IF the VA state police denied her due to "being a convicted felon", that she would have promptly been arrested/detained/questioned...something.

phoglund
February 9, 2011, 12:44 PM
Simple answer: Nope.

Besides, its not the VA State Police (are there state police in VA?), but the Feds who denied her.

ryanrichmond
February 9, 2011, 12:49 PM
(are there state police in VA?)

Yes we have state troopers

phoglund
February 9, 2011, 12:53 PM
Interesting, I remember State Troopers when I lived in VA (years ago), but think of them (in retrospect) as equivalent to the Highway Patrol types we have here in MT.

Thanks for the update.

ryanrichmond
February 9, 2011, 12:56 PM
but think of them (in retrospect) as equivalent to the Highway Patrol types we have here in MT

More or less, it's the same way now. I live 2 miles from VA State Police HQ and I never see them on local roads. Always the Highways.

Sorry, didn't mean to thread-jack. Carry on

roperninja
February 9, 2011, 12:56 PM
I remember at first the guy at the store(total numbskull) gave them the wrong social even though I had written it correctly, he then corrected it but I could not hear him talking so im unsure he didnt get any of the other numbers incorrect or maybe other information.

roperninja
February 9, 2011, 12:57 PM
Would it be a red flag or bad idea (I REALLY WANT TO), just go to another place and try again, and see what happens before persuing to the ATF for reasoning?

frieshoo
February 9, 2011, 01:03 PM
I would go to the original store (where you were denied) and get a copy of the paperwork. Look it over, and hopefully, there will be a typo of some sort.

If the paperwork looks good, you might have to contact the Feds and find out the reason.

oldbanjo
February 9, 2011, 01:04 PM
Maybe a friend wanted the Gun so they don't want to sell it to you.

RustHunter87
February 9, 2011, 01:05 PM
you might have an unpaid fine or parking ticket something like that, happened to a friend of mine

Owen Sparks
February 9, 2011, 01:06 PM
There is something very wrong when a person has to prove himself innocent before exercizing a constitutional right.

prissanna
February 9, 2011, 01:30 PM
I work at a place that sells guns. I hope it's OK to post this here as I joined just for this reason. :neener:

There is an appeals website you can go to:
nicsapps@leo.gov

roperninja
February 9, 2011, 01:33 PM
Why don't you just sell me a SAIGA12 then since you are competent.

And at the gentleman that suggested I go get paperwork from the store, I am sure my information was proper on the form where I wrote it, I am unsure that the tool sales guy was competent enough to relay that information properly over the phone.

roperninja
February 9, 2011, 01:35 PM
Also, that looks like an email address not a site. What to do with that?

Red Tornado
February 9, 2011, 01:40 PM
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/nics/general-information/fact-sheet

There's the web site. From it:
NICS Appeals

Individuals who are denied the purchase of a firearm may request that the NICS or the state which processed their transaction provide the reasons for the denial. The regulations address the process for filing an appeal. Appellants must include the NTN assigned to their transaction. Appeals may be submitted via the NICS Appeal facsimile at (304) 625-0535; by e-mail at nicsapps@leo.gov; or by mail to the FBI, Criminal Justice Information Services Division, NICS Section, Appeal Services Team, Module A-1, Post Office Box 4278, Clarksburg, WV 26302-4278.



Good luck,
RT

T Bran
February 9, 2011, 01:46 PM
I would definately start checking with everyone involved in this day and age of identity theft. Sooner the better but I dont wish that on anyone!

roperninja
February 9, 2011, 01:49 PM
Are they going to interrogate me (i get nervous) or am I just going to say my name and social and get a reason then hang up?

ryanrichmond
February 9, 2011, 01:54 PM
You should only be nervous if you're doing something illegal. It's your right to have a firearm as long as you're legally allowed to.

T Bran
February 9, 2011, 02:06 PM
If they thought you were doing something illegal calling would not do you any harm since they allready have your contact info from the form however not contacting them might cause you greif in the future. Not to mention the stress of not knowing why.

roperninja
February 9, 2011, 03:25 PM
Im a nervous person when it comes to inquiring, not for any reason of doing anything wrong. Its just a habit.

Bubbles
February 9, 2011, 03:51 PM
There are a lot of reasons that people who are not "prohibited persons" still get denied by NICS. One of those reasons was touched on earlier - the gun purchaser's name/DOB/etc. matches that of a felon.

Go to the FBI web site listed above, appeal the denial, and apply for a UPIN (Universal Personal Identification Number).

Also in some states dealers don't have to call NICS for purchasers who have a concealed carry permit. I don't know if this is an option for the OP since he didn't list his state of residence...

W.E.G.
February 9, 2011, 03:59 PM
http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd7/rkba2da/RKBA/vafbrocheng_Page_1.jpg

http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd7/rkba2da/RKBA/vafbrocheng_Page_2.jpg

W.E.G.
February 9, 2011, 04:01 PM
http://foia.fbi.gov/vaf.htm

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA)
NICS - Voluntary Appeal File (VAF)

January 6, 2006

I. BACKGROUND

This PIA is conducted pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, P.L. 107-347, the accompanying guidelines issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on September 26, 2003, and the FBI's PIA guidelines.

In November 1993, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (Brady Act) was signed into law. [1] The Brady Act required that federal firearms licensees conduct background checks on individuals attempting to purchase firearms. The permanent provisions of the Brady Act, which became effective November 30, 1998, required the Attorney General to establish the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). NICS is a national name check system that queries available records in the National Crime Information Center (NCIC), the Interstate Index (III), and the NICS Index to determine if prospective purchasers are disqualified from receiving firearms. NICS provides federal firearms licensees with an immediate determination as to whether the transfer of a firearm may proceed or if more research is required to determine whether the transfer would violate federal or state law. Firearms purchasers who are denied may request the reason for the denial and may challenge the accuracy of the record upon which the denial is based. [2]

Pursuant to a final rule published on July 20, 2004, the NICS must destroy identifying information by or on behalf of any person who has been determined not to be prohibited from receiving a firearm no more than twenty four (24) hours after the system advises a federal firearms licensee that the transfer would not violate the Brady Act. [3] Accordingly, NICS must destroy all identifying information on allowed transactions prior to the start of the next business day. If a potential purchaser is delayed or denied a firearm and successfully appeals the decision, NICS cannot retain the record of the appeal or the supporting documentation. To that end, individuals who wish to make subsequent purchases may be delayed or denied again until the record has been re-reviewed or until the purchaser has appealed the denial by resubmitting the same documentation/information. In order to prevent future delays or erroneous denials, the final rule permits lawful transferees to request that NICS maintain information about themselves in a

Voluntary Appeal File (VAF), a separate computer file that will be checked by NICS.

The NICS has developed a brochure which fully explains Brady Act requirements and includes a VAF application. Through the VAF application, potential purchasers will have the option to request that the NICS maintain personal identifying information about them which would otherwise be destroyed. This information includes, but is not limited to, fingerprint cards, [4] photographs, court documentation, correspondence, and information contained in the applicant’s appeal file if one exists. [5] The VAF permits applicants to voluntarily submit personal identifying information for the limited purpose of clarifying existing records or proving identity.

On November 12, 2004, the FBI submitted the VAF information request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for notice and public comment. [6]

II. ASSESSMENT

A. What information is being collected?

The VAF contains information voluntarily submitted by firearms purchasers via the VAF application. Purchasers have the option of supplying the NICS with personal identifying information such as their name, sex, race, height, weight, sex, date of birth, alien registration number, and social security number. Further, purchasers have the option of supplying other identifying numbers such as military identification numbers, driver license numbers, FBI numbers and state identification numbers. Documents or information which clarify records or prove identity (e.g., fingerprint cards, photographs, court records, pardons, etc.) are entered into the VAF. Paper copies are retained and filed accordingly by the NICS.

B. Why is the information being collected?

The information is being collected for the limited purpose of providing applicants with a means by which they can submit information to the VAF to prevent future erroneous denials or extended delays of firearms purchases or transfers.

C. What is the intended use of the information?

Because the final rule mandates that the NICS destroy all identifying information on allowed transactions within twenty four (24) hours, applicants who are delayed or denied a firearm purchase, and who successfully appeal the denials, would be required to resubmit documentation/information for every subsequent firearms purchase without the VAF. The VAF permits individuals to submit documentation which proves or clarifies identity. Upon receipt of a VAF application, NICS staff conducts research to determine whether an applicant has a disqualifying record which would prohibit the applicant from purchasing a firearm. NICS employees input the results of the research in the "comments and hit" summary field. The hit and comment summary includes NCIC, III, NICS, and ICE hits. Non-identifiable and identifiable hits are duly noted in the VAF. If the NICS determines that there is no disqualifying information which would prevent the applicant from purchasing the firearm and validates the information supplied by the applicant, the application is approved and the applicant is assigned a Unique Personal Identification Numbers (UPIN). NICS notifies these applicants in writing. NICS retains paper files of the other data submitted by successful applicants. NICS notifies unsuccessful applicants that their applications have been denied via letter. Other data submitted by unsuccessful applicants are destroyed. [7] However, the NICS may retain records as long as needed to pursue cases of identified misuse of the system.

D. With whom will the information be shared?

FBI personnel (Legal Instruments Examiners, Program Analysts, Supervisors, Management Staff) and state points of contact have access to the information in the VAF for the purpose of conducting NICS checks. [8] State points of contact are able to obtain a numeric and alphabetic list of entrants in the VAF through Law Enforcement Online (LEO). Access is "read-only" for all users with the exception of NICS staff responsible for adding/deleting information from the VAF. Information may be disclosed in accordance with applicable regulations and routine uses.

E. What opportunities will individuals have to decline to provide information or to consent to particular uses of the information?

Submission of information to the VAF is strictly voluntary. Successful applicants who have supplied information and who wish to have the information removed may make a written request to have the information removed. Upon receipt, the NICS will destroy all documentation/information entered in the VAF. However, the FBI may retain records as long as needed to pursue cases of identified misuse of the system. [9]

F. How will the information be secured?

Until the VAF becomes an integrated part of the NICS computer system, the NICS is using a VAF prototype which resides in a separate electronic system folder. The folder is solely accessible to employees within the NICS and select NICS staff have modification privileges. Authorized users have "read only" access. Physical security protections include guards and locked facilities requiring badges and passwords for access. Records are accessed by authorized government personnel and are protected by appropriate physical and technological safeguards to prevent unauthorized access.

During the implementation stage, federal, state and local law enforcement agencies that seek access to records located in the VAF obtain VAF information through LEO via password. [10]

VAF information is contained within a closed special interest group. Federal, state and local points of contact must specifically request entry into the special interest group. Three (3) members, two (2) program analysts and one (1) liaison of the NICS staff approve membership applications to the special interest group. Currently, state and local law enforcement agencies who query the VAF database via LEO are able to view a listing of all VAF participants. NICS advised that, in order to restrict access in LEO, the NICS would have to expend between $ 500,000 and $ 1,000,000. The NICS advised that such an expenditure would impact the NICS' other current high priority operations and maintenance efforts. Thus, the NICS' advises that restricting access to individualized queries in LEO is not feasible at this time.

In CY 2006, the VAF will become an integrated part of the NICS computer system. The NICS advises that queries in the VAF will limited to individualized queries at that time. Information maintained in the NICS is stored electronically in a secure FBI computer environment. [11] Access to information in the NICS is restricted to authorized personnel of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. [12] These agencies must have adequate physical security to protect against any unauthorized personnel gaining access to computer equipment. [13] Further, employees who have access to NICS information must be thoroughly screened. [14]

G. Is this a system of records?

Yes, the VAF contains personally identifiable information regarding individuals and information is retrieved by name or personal identifier. The NICS Privacy Act system notice is being amended to reflect the VAF. [15]

H. What choices did the FBI make regarding an IT system or collection of information as a result of performing the PIA?

NICS has determined that the collection of information is necessary to prevent delays and denials of firearms purchases. Thus, there is no reasonable alternative to the VAF. Applicants to the VAF voluntarily submit personal identifying information which is verified and retained by NICS for the limited purpose of facilitating the purchase of firearms. Applicants who submit this information may request in writing that the information be removed from the VAF. Thus, the VAF does not involve any new collection techniques or processes that may be controversial or invasive of personal privacy.

As a result of conducting the PIA, the Senior Privacy Official [16] determined that the fact that state and local law enforcement agencies who query the VAF database via LEO are able to view a listing of all VAF participants created limited privacy risks. The Senior Privacy Official discussed this issue with the NICS and the NICS advised that because of the tremendous costs associated with restricting access in LEO, it is unable to restrict access at this time. The Senior Privacy Official determined that because access to the VAF, via LEO is temporary, and because access will be restricted once the VAF becomes part of the NICS computer system, the privacy risks associated with access to VAF information via LEO are sufficiently mitigated.

III. APPROVAL

The FBI's Senior Privacy Official has reviewed this system for privacy policy issues, perceives no unusual privacy concerns at stake here, and approves the FBI's implementation of this system. Specifically, applicants to the VAF voluntarily submit personal identifying information which is verified and retained by NICS for the limited purpose of facilitating the purchase of firearms. Applicants who submit this information may request in writing that the information be removed from the VAF. The dissemination of the information is limited to legitimate purposes in compliance with allowable disclosures for information contained in the NICS system of records. Further, information submitted to the VAF is verified by NICS personnel who contact the contributing agencies to verify that information is accurate. Moreover, NICS verifies data by performing scheduled assessments and audits. Ultimately, the VAF is a simple system containing routine information which is voluntarily submitted and involves limited use and access. A new Privacy Act systems notice is not required, but the NICS notice will be amended to reflect the VAF.

[1] 18 U.S.C. 923 (2004).

[2] 28 C.F.R. 25.10(a), (c) (2004).

[3] National Instant Criminal Background Check System Regulation, 69 FR 43892 (July 23, 2004) (to be codified at 28 C.F.R. pt. 25).

[4] Fingerprint impressions must be prepared by a law enforcement agency who must stamp their agency name, address, and telephone number in the designated area.

[5] NICS maintains paper copies of information submitted for entry into the VAF.

[6] Sixty (60) Day Emergency Notice of Collection Under Review Voluntary Appeal File, 69 Fed. Reg. 65455 (proposed Nov. 12, 2004). On May 2, 2005, the FBI resubmitted the VAF information request to OMB for public comment. See Thirty (30) Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review, 70 Fed. Reg. 22704 (proposed May 2, 2005). The notice provided an additional thirty (30) days for public comment. See id.

[7] NICS returns fingerprint cards to unsuccessful applicants.

[8] The folder is also accessible to information technology personnel who provide technical support to the NICS.

[9] 25 C.F.R. 25.10(g).

[10] Access to LEO is subject to FBI approval. LEO is accessed via password and all network traffic is monitored and recorded by personnel authorized by the FBI.

[11] 28 C.F.R. 25.8(a)-(b).

[12] 28 C.F.R. 25.8(c)(1)-(5),(d)(1)-(3).

[13] Id.

[14] Id.

[15] See 63 FR 30514 (June 4, 1998).

[16] This position is currently held by Deputy General Counsel Patrick W. Kelley.

c919
February 9, 2011, 05:52 PM
Just appeal it and if all is well they'll call us in a week or so tell you to go get your gun.

It happened to me once. I appealed and they called be three days later to apologize and told me I was in the clear.

franconialocal
February 9, 2011, 06:12 PM
Years ago (1996) I got my start in law enforcement with the U.S. National Park Service seasonal ranger progam....attended the academy....got placement and interviews, etc. out west at Glacier and Yellowstone NP.

About 2 weeks into the "finalization" process with the feds :banghead: they called and told me that, despite my efforts, they would not be needing my services. They had run my background check through the system and I was matched up with a guy in Wyoming that had the same name, date of birth, physical description, same middle initial, and our SSN was very close. A further check revealed that this guy was a felon with about a six page background and they had mistaken me with him. I explained to the NPS that I had never even left NH at that time aside from trips to Maine, Vermont, Canada and other "local" areas. I never lived or stepped foot west of the mighty river. I had held security jobs, EMT jobs etc. that all required background checks with no problem. Long and short of it...it all turned out ok in the end but the hoops and hoops I had to jump through to set the record straight.

Most states have information catagorized in a system called SOUNDEX which matches similarities like this. I'm confident that this is the loop you got stuck in and all it will take is some clarification. I know that the hoop-jump game can be very frustrating but stick with it. There is no reason to be nervous or intimidated by the process if you are the "right guy" in this case. Often times just one or two missing or broken-chain bits of information is all it takes to send up the red flags. Good luck !!

gamestalker
February 9, 2011, 06:30 PM
A good number of other wise unexplained denials is because the information isn't the same as what if one your DL or an error was made on the form. If you are using a driver license that has a different address or isn't surrent that will get you denied. In the state I live in a descision has to be made to either deny or approve within 72 hrs.. If a hold or delay is the response, we get approved after 72 hrs has lapsed.

roperninja
February 9, 2011, 07:34 PM
Ok, well, before I get way into it, is there any reason to fear just waiting a couple weeks and going to try and purchase the same gun somewhere else? And see what happens?

Sulaco
February 9, 2011, 08:54 PM
Only you know if there is some reason why you wouldn't be eligible. If there isn't, then simply contact the proper people and sort it out. If I were you and I knew I was legit, I'll be darned if I'd let the stinking government play games with me.

roperninja
February 9, 2011, 09:28 PM
Im a legit guy, no reason to think I cant. But I also am avoiding the hassle. Going back running it again and hoping for the right answer sounds so much easier, and definitely worth it if they say yes...to me at least.

roperninja
February 9, 2011, 09:36 PM
Basically what I guess I am Fishing for is by being so impatient and avoiding the confrontation with the feds, is am I doing anything WRONG by just asking them to run it again, and if they say no again, its just as simple as that, and nothing more?

Warhawk83
February 9, 2011, 09:45 PM
No, nothing wrong with just asking them to run it again. If you have no reason to be denied, have them run it again or go somewhere else. If you're denied a second time, appeal to find out the reason. Could be a simple mix-up with someone that has the same name.

roperninja
February 9, 2011, 09:51 PM
Thanks!

Wow I love this place. I think due to my hardheadedness, I am going to give it a shot and report back tomorrow. thanks for all your time you guys.

BigMustard
February 9, 2011, 10:03 PM
Make sure and really double check the form. I have really bad handwriting even though I try extra hard on those forms. I was denied once because I did not put the roman numeral "IV" after my name and did not put my SSN. So from now on I make sure to put my SSN and the appropriate suffix.

Every now and again I will get my dads or grandfathers mail. I even get some of their information on my credit report. Which is ridiculous. Never the less, people make mistakes just tell the person to run it again and make sure all the information is correct.

roperninja
February 9, 2011, 10:06 PM
Will do! I really hope to log on tomorrow and tell you guys about my new gun! :)

Classified00
February 9, 2011, 10:12 PM
If I were the suspicious type, and I am, I'd say that something doesn't seem right with this story...

:uhoh:

roperninja
February 9, 2011, 10:18 PM
Congrats

Bubbles
February 9, 2011, 10:19 PM
Ok, well, before I get way into it, is there any reason to fear just waiting a couple weeks and going to try and purchase the same gun somewhere else? And see what happens?
As long as you know that you're not a prohibited person there is nothing to fear. That said, I do not expect a different result.

roperninja
February 9, 2011, 10:20 PM
Why not?

CZguy
February 9, 2011, 11:31 PM
If I were the suspicious type, and I am, I'd say that something doesn't seem right with this story...


Whenever I feel that way............I just put on my tinfoil hat, and everything is better. :D

In all seriousness, I'd just call and get it cleared up.

788Ham
February 10, 2011, 01:06 AM
Is this one of the localities that allow only one gun purchase a month? Just a thought after reading all of the other enquires! Don't know about all cities, counties, some are more weird than others.

Classified00
February 10, 2011, 07:08 AM
CZ,
He's avoiding calling either the store or the gov to ask why, he's asking if he'll get in trouble if he tries again and there are inconsistencies in his posts ( first the guy entered the ssn wrong then the poster is confident in the guy's accuracy). I don't need an alien conspiracy to know that he's not telling the whole story.
:scrutiny:

stonecutter2
February 10, 2011, 07:42 AM
CZ,
He's avoiding calling either the store or the gov to ask why, he's asking if he'll get in trouble if he tries again and there are inconsistencies in his posts ( first the guy entered the ssn wrong then the poster is confident in the guy's accuracy). I don't need an alien conspiracy to know that he's not telling the whole story.
:scrutiny:
I see no conspiracy here. I'd be interested in finding out what goes on when he tries again.

Superpsy
February 10, 2011, 08:33 AM
I am interested to find out what happens when roperninja asks them to run the check again. I've thought about doing this if I'm ever denied...I'm always delayed from 5 minutes to a day. (doesn't it seem like we have a bunch of denial threads recently?)

bikemutt
February 10, 2011, 08:38 AM
Unfortunately the store doesn't know the reason why, they just know it was denied and here's the NTN.

And he can't call the gov to find out why because they will not provide that information telephonicly (their word).

He needs to submit full name, mailing address and NTN to NICS either by snail mail, email or fax. Then wait for them to mail the results back to him, supposedly within 5 days.

RimfireChris
February 10, 2011, 09:56 AM
@ Superspy-Not to sound like one of the tinfoil hat crowd, but I've been noticing that too, here and on other forums. And the last gun purchase I made took longer than usual to go through, but I found out later that was Cabelas' screw up, nothing weird.

Bubbles
February 10, 2011, 11:27 AM
I don't expect a different result because of my experience as an IT professional (Oracle developer/DBA), not because I'm an FFL. NICS queries a bunch of databases. If nothing in the OP's data changes, and the same query is run, I wouldn't expect a different outcome.

Axel Larson
February 10, 2011, 11:45 AM
Please let us know how it turns out. Good luck.

roperninja
February 10, 2011, 12:50 PM
Nay sayers were correct (so far). It got a delay. I dont know what that means the odds are of it being denied on the last day again are though.

Superpsy
February 10, 2011, 12:53 PM
Here's hoping it's not a denial.

bikemutt
February 10, 2011, 01:16 PM
Looking at the brochure, last page, "Note: If denied, your name will be included in a file accessible to law enforcement".

So in theory, even though NICS shreds the transaction within 24 hours (?), if nothing else changes, when a denied person tries again, NICS will presumably query the same file they put the person's name into, and voila, they know the person was previously denied.

I probably watched too much Perry Mason as a kid :)

roperninja
February 10, 2011, 08:55 PM
Damn geniouses always thinking of stuff.

DenaliPark
February 11, 2011, 06:59 PM
Ok, well, before I get way into it, is there any reason to fear just waiting a couple weeks and going to try and purchase the same gun somewhere else? And see what happens?
Yeah there is! Why on earth wouldn't you be screaming your brains out at the fed for an explanation? Honestly, that gives me pause...

prissanna
February 12, 2011, 05:50 PM
Sorry. It is an email address. Email them.

Superpsy
February 25, 2011, 08:36 AM
What happened roperninja?

Darkhades
November 13, 2012, 09:43 PM
This happen to me, but was a little different and I might understand why. I was originally convicted of something I didnt do, later on I was cleared. I had to go thought hell and hi water to fix everything ( well not really but it was a pain ). Either way after that I always got delay, but I would never put my SS, so I got the great idea to put my SS down on the last gun i bought. Well guess what there was a denial. So my process is the one that is a easy fix some times, you just email the nics with the proper doc's that show you are good to go. Since this is on my record, even tho it shows dismissed it doesnt matter, I can get denial every time unless I get the pin nics puts out. So that is what I am done right now as I type this out. I had bought 3 other firearms before this and have a ccp of my state, just a pain in the ass really.

Salmoneye
November 14, 2012, 06:44 AM
A year and a half old thread, and you signed up here just to bump it?

:scrutiny:

ole farmerbuck
November 14, 2012, 07:04 AM
I thought what Darkhades said was interesting.

mgkdrgn
November 14, 2012, 09:03 AM
Would it be a red flag or bad idea (I REALLY WANT TO), just go to another place and try again, and see what happens before persuing to the ATF for reasoning?
Both.

Get the transaction number from the shop, contact the FBI. Learn the reason for the denial and appeal it.

There -is- a process here, do yourself a favor and follow it, 'cause it's the only way this will get resolved.

mljdeckard
November 14, 2012, 09:23 AM
Don't yell at the man for bumping a thread. Remember, we usually yell at people who start a new thread when there are already plenty on the same topic.

Frank Ettin
November 14, 2012, 09:54 AM
Necro-thread, let's let it rest.

If you enjoyed reading about "New here still. Just got denied a gun after 5 days." here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!