Colt Agent - Post 1972


PDA






Ala Dan
August 22, 2011, 08:27 AM
Hello Members and Fans-

Just wondering which of these two would be the most valuable, and your
first choice~?

a) Late '72 or very early '73 HIGH POLISHED blue Colt Agent, all original
with beautiful factory Coltwood grips?

or b) an 80's model PARKERIZED Colt Agent, with smooth wood grips?

*Both have the Colt medallion embeded in the grips~!

If you enjoyed reading about "Colt Agent - Post 1972" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
huntershooter
August 22, 2011, 08:37 AM
Can't speak deffinitevly on value, but my choice would be the early 70's/blued Agent.

heeler
August 22, 2011, 08:42 AM
Clearly A.
Those things are getting pricey too.

doc540
August 22, 2011, 09:13 AM
can you post a pic of "A"?

I'd like to see a highly polished alloy frame.


And, yes, "A" will usually bring the most money.

WC145
August 22, 2011, 09:17 AM
Definitely the blued one. I just bought this parkerized Agent a week ago and only gave $225 + tax. It looked like it may have been unfired (or it was until Saturday:)), probably somebody's sock drawer gun. I got a great deal but if you check gunbroker the parkerized guns don't bring all that much more than that. Plus, the blued gun you're looking at will be much better finished, the parked guns are very rough on the outside. Internally they're fine, with nice actions, but they didn't put much effort into cleaning up the machining marks.

Luckily, you can't really lose if the prices are right because either way you go you're going to get a great shooting little gun.

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Iq98rPwzIxw/TlFtnlb_R2I/AAAAAAAADlE/sYIgEoQAByc/s800/SDC11598.JPG

heeler
August 22, 2011, 09:37 AM
WC145 if you bought that pistol that cheap then you got a steal even if it is the parkerized version.
You could practically resell for double.

Old Fuff
August 22, 2011, 10:18 AM
Colt's big problem was that the original 1908 design used in the Agent, as well as other models required highly skilled, hand fitted assembly. As time went by this sort of handwork got more and more expensive in terms of labor costs, and Colt's management tried to cut back on it. This was one of the many bad mistakes they made because it impacted on the quality of they're products on one hand, but still left them with a too-high for the market retail price.

If all things are equal, always buy the earlier gun.

RickMD
August 22, 2011, 10:22 AM
I recently sold a mid 70's, high polished, unfired Agent on Gunbroker for $595 if that's of any help.

Guillermo
August 22, 2011, 10:32 AM
earlier almost always equals better with Colt revolvers

ColtPythonElite
August 22, 2011, 10:39 AM
The early gun is far superior to the 80's gun when it comes to fit and finish....However, I have one of the 80's guns that I sure like to carry around in my front pocket.

The Lone Haranguer
August 22, 2011, 12:35 PM
The older blued one would be more valuable as a collector. The parkerized/rough ones were made toward the end of the production life, as a cost-cutting measure.

doc540
August 22, 2011, 01:47 PM
I'm certainly no D frame expert, but it's my understanding that the Agent alloy frames weren't actually "blued" like the cylinders and barrels.

I've owned several, and the one I carry definitely has frame finish different than the steel barrel and cylinder.

9mmepiphany
August 22, 2011, 05:51 PM
I'd go with the blued Agent.

Every parkerized Agent I've ever seen had fitment issues with their sideplate

bannockburn
August 22, 2011, 06:07 PM
Definitely go with Model (A).

I had one of those cost-cutting parkerized Agents in the mid '80's and it was terrible. The matte finish (if you could call it that), was very thin in places and was unevenly applied throughout the whole gun. The smooth wood grips were very rough and were poorly fitted to the frame. The cylinder crane asssembly was so misaligned that the cylinder got wedged into the forcing cone of the barrel after 5 rounds. Not one of Colts best efforts back then and certainly not worth having today.

Ala Dan
August 22, 2011, 08:20 PM
Many thanks guy's for the quick replies; as your opinions are always
treasured. As of right now, I am unable to post pics of my Colt Agent;
as described in sub heading a~! I will go as far to tell you all that I got
in this gem for only $120 out-of-the-pocket; as bought from a lil' old
man whose wife wanted all guns out of the house~! ;) :D

Guillermo
August 22, 2011, 08:33 PM
$120...should have bought BOTH!!!

WC145
August 22, 2011, 10:17 PM
$120...should have bought BOTH!!!
+1!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Guillermo
August 22, 2011, 10:22 PM
Dan is no rookie...

I am sure he had to choose

doc540
August 22, 2011, 10:23 PM
http://giovannicucullo.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/green-with-envy.jpg

:D

Ala Dan
August 23, 2011, 08:09 AM
Actually, these two Colt Agent's were different transactions fella's~! I got mine
[the highly polished blued model] long before (2-1/2 years, maybe ?), before
ever seeing the parkerized model I mentioned. BTW, the [very rough] park
model sold for $299 + 10% sales tax; whereas my gun was only $120 OTD,
lock, stock, and barrel~! ;) :D

If you enjoyed reading about "Colt Agent - Post 1972" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!