New toy needs a scope


PDA






Winkey
December 26, 2011, 01:09 AM
I just got me a 10/22 for my christmas present to myself, its a 10/22 LVT stainless, i wanted to get some input on scope options, its gonna be a split 50/50 plinking/target shooting and hunting gun(squirrel/rabbit/woods gun), i was thinking a Adjustable objective 3x9x40 scope, please give brand suggestions, money is not really and option(under $500) also note that its gun spend alot of time riding in trucks so durability and zero hold is very important. And advise would be great. Thanks Brent

If you enjoyed reading about "New toy needs a scope" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
gunner69
December 26, 2011, 01:18 AM
Winkey, As my old German Jager teacher used to say "spend more on your optics that the basic weapon (he said rifle)"...... With quality optics (Not a $29.95 Chinese scope) you can get those rugers to shoot great. Buy a 30mm scope ,of the recticle you like best, and press on. Good Luck, and many squirrels and rabbits to your hunting pouch!

wyohome
December 26, 2011, 01:19 AM
I would go with a lower power variable, maybe 1.5x6 or something.

husker
December 26, 2011, 01:21 AM
10/22 truck gun. 50 dollar Walmart High point.
I have a 3X9-32 on a Rem 597. It gets knocked around a lil bit when we are pheasant hunting. Its been a good scope for 5 years. Never have had to re-zero it.
Shot plenty of pheasants out of the ditches with it.

jpwilly
December 26, 2011, 01:49 AM
I think a 3-9x40 is ideal even a 2-7x32 is a good fit. In that price range I think a Nikon Prostaff, Bushnell 3200, Weaver, etc anything with good glass. It's been a while since I've had a scope not hold zero even el cheapos seem to work okay but many el cheapos have left me wishing for better optics, repeatable adjustments, fast focus eyepiece etc. 3-9x40mms are so basic may as well have quality.

BrocLuno
December 26, 2011, 02:54 PM
Either AO or parallax set for 50 yds. I'd just put a 22 rimfire Nikon on it and go from there :)

jmr40
December 26, 2011, 03:16 PM
No need for a 30mm tube on a 22. Something along the lines of a 2-7X32 variable is all you need. 3-9-40X at the most. The Nikon Prostaff series or Redfield Revolution can be had for around $150 or so and is plenty of scope.

benzy2
December 26, 2011, 10:42 PM
im torn on this choice as a target scope and a hunting scope are on opposite ends of what id be looking for in a scope. For hunting a 2-7 or 3-9 would do everything youll ever need with a 22. For target shooting i dont mind extra weight or size and prefer a high magnification optic. Plinking can use either end and be fun. I would need to know how serious the target shooting would be to know how much id compromise on the hunting side of the.scope.

Gideon
December 26, 2011, 10:49 PM
Nikon now makes a rimfire model in 3-9 x 40 that would be a good all round scope. It'll be on the large size but decent in both areas. For squirrels a fixed 4 power Nikon .22 scope is as good as it gets. For pure target then a 14 power or higher makes a big difference.

gideon

Friendly, Don't Fire!
December 26, 2011, 10:54 PM
I would consider a fixed power scope, say 4X. For the accurate distances the AVERAGE PERSON can shoot a .22 LR, personally I don't see the necessity for a 9X.

Also, consider this. You are more likely to get a good fixed-power scope for the same money as you would use to purchase a variable power, as the fixed power is much simpler, which also translates into less potential problems over a variable.

saenzrich
December 26, 2011, 11:27 PM
Here's a bit to read, but it helped me decide to go with the Vortex Diamondback 2-7x35 Rimfire...it has a parallax setting of 50yds and is very good glass... it sits on my 10/22 nicely.

http://www.opticstalk.com/inexpensive-scope-comparison_topic21176.html

If you enjoyed reading about "New toy needs a scope" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!