Bombing Mr. Johnson


PDA






DaveB
January 29, 2003, 11:40 AM
I'm Losing My Patience With My Neighbors, Mr. Bush
By TERRY JONES

I'm really excited by George Bush's latest reason for bombing Iraq: he's running out of patience. And so am I!

For some time now I've been really pissed off with Mr Johnson, who lives a couple of doors down the street. Well, him and Mr Patel, who runs the health food shop. They both give me queer looks, and I'm sure Mr Johnson is planning something nasty for me, but so far I haven't been able to discover what. I've been round to his place a few times to see what he's up to, but he's got everything well hidden. That's how devious he is.

As for Mr Patel, don't ask me how I know, I just know--from very good sources--that he is, in reality, a Mass Murderer. I have leafleted the street telling them that if we don't act first, he'll pick us off one by one.

Some of my neighbours say, if I've got proof, why don't I go to the police? But that's simply ridiculous. The police will say that they need evidence of a crime with which to charge my neighbours.

They'll come up with endless red tape and quibbling about the rights and wrongs of a pre-emptive strike and all the while Mr Johnson will be finalising his plans to do terrible things to me, while Mr Patel will be secretly murdering people. Since I'm the only one in the street with a decent range of automatic firearms, I reckon it's up to me to keep the peace. But until recently that's been a little difficult. Now, however, George W. Bush has made it clear that all I need to do is run out of patience, and then I can wade in and do whatever I want!

And let's face it, Mr Bush's carefully thought-out policy towards Iraq is the only way to bring about international peace and security. The one certain way to stop Muslim fundamentalist suicide bombers targeting the US or the UK is to bomb a few Muslim countries that have never threatened us.

That's why I want to blow up Mr Johnson's garage and kill his wife and children. Strike first! That'll teach him a lesson. Then he'll leave us in peace and stop peering at me in that totally unacceptable way.

Mr Bush makes it clear that all he needs to know before bombing Iraq is that Saddam is a really nasty man and that he has weapons of mass destruction--even if no one can find them. I'm certain I've just as much justification for killing Mr Johnson's wife and children as Mr Bush has for bombing Iraq.

Mr Bush's long-term aim is to make the world a safer place by eliminating 'rogue states' and 'terrorism'. It's such a clever long-term aim because how can you ever know when you've achieved it? How will Mr Bush know when he's wiped out all terrorists? When every single terrorist is dead? But then a terrorist is only a terrorist once he's committed an act of terror. What about would-be terrorists? These are the ones you really want to eliminate, since most of the known terrorists, being suicide bombers, have already eliminated themselves.

Perhaps Mr Bush needs to wipe out everyone who could possibly be a future terrorist? Maybe he can't be sure he's achieved his objective until every Muslim fundamentalist is dead? But then some moderate Muslims might convert to fundamentalism. Maybe the only really safe thing to do would be for Mr Bush to eliminate all Muslims?

It's the same in my street. Mr Johnson and Mr Patel are just the tip of the iceberg. There are dozens of other people in the street who I don't like and who--quite frankly--look at me in odd ways. No one will be really safe until I've wiped them all out.

My wife says I might be going too far but I tell her I'm simply using the same logic as the President of the United States. That shuts her up.

Like Mr Bush, I've run out of patience, and if that's a good enough reason for the President, it's good enough for me. I'm going to give the whole street two weeks--no, 10 days--to come out in the open and hand over all aliens and interplanetary hijackers, galactic outlaws and interstellar terrorist masterminds, and if they don't hand them over nicely and say 'Thank you', I'm going to bomb the entire street to kingdom come.

It's just as sane as what George W. Bush is proposing--and, in contrast to what he's intending, my policy will destroy only one street.

Terry Jones is a founding member of Monty Python.

db:D

If you enjoyed reading about "Bombing Mr. Johnson" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Viking6
January 29, 2003, 11:57 AM
Monty Python was really funny. I used to crack up at their movies and their show. But Mr. Jones' humorous little analogy is a little off by comparison.

Atticus
January 29, 2003, 11:58 AM
More Brit logic.... :rolleyes: He should stick to comedy.

A more accurate comparison - A neighbor shoots half his family, shoots at neighbors and loots their homes, hides the weapon (claims he threw it away) and refuses to prove to police that he did destroy it - even though they offer to leave him alone if he will prove that he is no longer armed.

Blackhawk
January 29, 2003, 12:00 PM
Terry Jones is a founding member of Monty Python. He's also a twit.

jmbg29
January 29, 2003, 01:57 PM
Oh, heh, I get it. He's making a funny by drawing out an absurd analogy! Very, very funny. :rolleyes:

My dad was right. We should have let Hitler pound England about 3 feet underwater before going over there and kicking his :cuss:. And my dad's half English!:fire: :fire: :fire:

Hey Mr. Jones! Why don't you have the local Constable send off a letter to Mr. Insane telling him how "dissapointed" they are with his bad behavior. Maybe if Mr. Insane spent all of his time opening up letters of strong disapproval, he wouldn't have as much time to pour acid into the eyes of children of dissidents. IN FRONT OF THEM!!!!!! Not quite so many traitors to his regime would end up on the meathooks don't you know?

Why, if he has to pay to get rid of all of those letters, he might have to cut back on the salary of the professional rapists that he hires. Think of all of the good you pinko pansies could do.

Brit maggot.

Vladimir Berkov
January 29, 2003, 10:53 PM
Of course, even Jones uses the word pre-emptive. A pre-emptive military strike is one taken in order to gain atvantage in the face of an imminent enemy attack. We don't even know if Saddam has nukes less, nor do we know if he is willing to use them against us, nor do we know if he plans to stike us in any way.

Thus Bush's war is not pre-emptive.


Unless of course, he knows more than he is telling and is planning on shooting first and answering questions later.

NeverAgain26
January 30, 2003, 08:55 AM
Cute piece, but knowing Monty Python's irreverance for most things (and our being able to laugh at them without taking things too seriously), I can't take Jones seriously in this piece. If he is going for serious political commentary, he is way too much of a clown for anyone to pay a lot of attention.

As most of our able posters have already responded, real life (Bush/Iraq) are a bit more complicated than Jones' piece here.

NA26

Dennis
January 30, 2003, 09:33 AM
Dear Mr. Jones,

You, Sir, are the epitome of the south end of the northbound critter which symbolizes the Democratic Party and their thought processes. I am Bush acolyte to the same extent you are a deep thinker. (Folks who know me should get a chuckle out of THAT one!)

1) Contrary to the fleeting delusions you consider knowledge, you are not so important that the President must reveal the sources or extent of our information on the activities of Saddam. There reaches a point where we must tentatively accept a politician (in this case our President) might, conceivably, actually be telling the truth. This may be a difficult leap of faith for many of us but remember our rulers DO want a country over which to rule. Therefore, in that aspect at least, our existence is of some small import to our elitist oligarchy.

2) “Strike first! That'll teach him a lesson.” If Saddam has any connection to those responsible for 9/11, then your disgusting and insulting attempt to belittle your betters carries less intellectual weight than the gaseous release of intestinal vapors by one of his camel’s fleas.

Lest I be misunderstood, Sir, “Pound sand!”

ArmsAkimber
January 30, 2003, 09:47 AM
He's also a twit.

Well, at least he's an upper class twit :D

(I'm a diehard Monty Python fan...couldn't resist!)

DeltaElite
January 30, 2003, 09:57 AM
I've got a piece of brain lodged in my head.......... :D

Cute piece, totally irrelevant to the political situation, but cute none the less.

Joe Demko
January 30, 2003, 10:15 AM
Graham Chapman was most of the genius behind the success of Monty Python.

If you enjoyed reading about "Bombing Mr. Johnson" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!