A non FFL wanting to ship a long gun to California-What needs to happen?
ol' scratch
March 6, 2012, 10:35 AM
I want to sell a Garand receiver to someone in California. It is a build that never materialized. I don't have an FFL. Does this present a problem? According to what I am reading, I just need to send it to a type 1 FFL in California due to the fact it is no longer C & R eligable. Is that correct? Or am I missing something?
Please. No California sucks, or I don't deal with them comments. They don't really help me.
If you enjoyed reading about "A non FFL wanting to ship a long gun to California-What needs to happen?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
dogtown tom
March 6, 2012, 10:49 AM
ol' scratch I want to sell a Garand receiver to someone in California. It is a build that never materialized. I don't have an FFL. Does this present a problem? According to what I am reading, I just need to send it to a type 1 FFL in California due to the fact it is no longer C & R eligable. Is that correct? Or am I missing something?
Please. No California sucks, or I don't deal with them comments. They don't really help me.
Both Federal law and California law allow a nonlicensee to ship firearms to a California dealer. Unlike FFL's, you have no special hoops to jump through.
Some FFL's refuse to accept shipments from nonlicensees, so tell your buyer he needs to find a dealer who will accept from you, OR he will be responsible for covering the additional expense of you having your dealer ship it for you.
You are correct, a Garand receiver is not C&R eligible.
Librarian
March 6, 2012, 05:29 PM
dogtown tom has it exactly right.
Your buyer has to find the right FFL.
If you enjoyed reading about "A non FFL wanting to ship a long gun to California-What needs to happen?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.