New Henry 30-30 impressions


April 30, 2012, 07:21 PM
Well, I finally got to get my hands on a Henry 30-30. Went into a local gun shop looking for some parts and sitting next to a golden boy was the new version of the Henry 30-30.

This is the newer model that they released with a fore end cap instead of a fore end band. It also comes with an XS ghost ring sight and an XS front sight.

Asked to take a look at it and I must say I was impressed. The wood to metal fit was excellent all the way around. The bluing was a nice deep blue. And the finish looked to be the same thickness as they put on their 22 rifles. This is a satin finish that's thick enough you can polish it to a gloss if you want to.

The checkering on the rifle is done by laser. The ridges were fine and clearly defined and very consistent on both the stock and the fore end. Detail in the checkering is excellent.

They allowed me to cycle the action and even that was pleasant. Because it is based on the 336 action it feels the same. Although with the Henry, it felt like an action that it already been cycled several hundred times instead of a rough gritty action like the new Remlins have.

The straight stock felt very comfortable in my hand and so did the fore end. The fore end on this rifle is narrower than that of the 336 and closer to what you would find on the Winchester.

The rifle was very well balanced. This is a 6.5 pound rifle and I swear it felt like it was only 4 pounds. It snapped up to the shoulder very easily. In fact, it felt better balanced than the 30 AW I have.

To my surprise, the butt plate is actually a thin recoil pad. It has some give to it but not too much, and is softer than the rubber butt plates that Marlin uses.

There were a couple of things that I would change on this rifle but they are minor. The first one is the set of the fore end to the barrel. The barrel channel on both sides fits tight against the barrel. I can see this introducing a drifting problem as the barrel heats up. In actuality however, this is no worse than most 336 rifles that have a gap on one side of the barrel and none on the other side. This is also an easy thing to fix. I would also like a slightly smaller ring on the back sight. But that's personal preference, and others would say it's just fine.

A lot of people have complained about the MSRP for these rifles. The street price at this store seemed reasonable to me. The shop is asking a around $640 for the rifle. That seems a little high priced until you consider the fact the ghost ring and front sights will cost you $80-$90 plus shipping. Then the swivels and studs would cost you another $20. That means you're paying around $500 for a rifle that, at this time, is built to a higher standard than the Marln/Remington 336.

Unfortunately, since it was in the store there was no way I could shoot it. So of course I cannot give you an accuracy report. However, were I not shifting employers in the next month and don't know how long the transition will take, I would have no problem plunking down the cash for this rifle.

So yes you can call me a heretic since I own a Marlin 30-30, but I calls 'em as I sees 'em. Oh yeah, when I wrote Henry with some questions, and asked them why I couldn't find a review, they told me they have so many orders coming in for the 30-30 and 45/70, they don't need the press. My guess is, until they get caught up, they'd prefer not to have any at this time. (Would just put them further behind)

Here's a picture from Henry's site. BTW, the picture does not do the rifle justice. It looks way better in person.

If you enjoyed reading about "New Henry 30-30 impressions" here in archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join today for the full version!
April 30, 2012, 07:24 PM
Henry makes some awesome rifles, but I could never bring myself to buy one because of that stupid way you have to load them! I NEED a loading gate on a lever gun! It's just not natural without it!

It is a veeeeeery nice gun though...

April 30, 2012, 07:27 PM
O.K. I'll be the first, heretic!:D

Carl N. Brown
April 30, 2012, 07:45 PM
That looks like a closer match to my Marlin .22 39 Mountie than my own Marlin 336W.

April 30, 2012, 08:52 PM
What are your thoughts on the safety/hammer?

April 30, 2012, 09:10 PM
I like the design profile, but as mentioned at Paco's, the lack of a side load gate seems unnecessarily archaic in a levergun.

April 30, 2012, 10:38 PM
Thanks Quietman - I have high hopes for Henry and it was nice to hear your favorable first impression.

May 1, 2012, 08:24 AM built to a higher standard than the Marln/Remington 336.
I've never found this to be the case in anything Henry builds. The reverse is true.

Carl N. Brown
May 1, 2012, 08:52 AM
Search for comments on "Remlins" or "Marlingtons". A lot of folks are disgruntled about recent Marlin production under Remington control at Remington factories. It is almost as though none of the people who knew how to build Marlins at the Connecticut factory were brought to the Remington New York factory.

May 1, 2012, 08:57 AM
I know all about Remlins. Fact remains I'd rather take my chances with one than anything Henry makes.

May 1, 2012, 09:11 AM
I know all about Remlins. Fact remains I'd rather take my chances with one than anything Henry makes.

Why is that? I have never even examined a Henry, but have read some relatively positive reviews about them.

I bought a Marlin 336C 30-30 in the early 90's, and it has been a great rifle. Crappy, gritty trigger, but other than that a very accurate carbine. I've taken several deer with it. It is sad to hear their quality has suffered due to all the changes. I hope Remington can clean up their act.

May 1, 2012, 09:17 AM
Their owners love them and rave about them all day long. It's almost cult-like. I've never been impressed with how they're made and could never bring myself to bring one home.

If you enjoyed reading about "New Henry 30-30 impressions" here in archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join today for the full version!