Mythbusters: Bringing a knife to a gun fight.
Owen Sparks
June 7, 2012, 11:09 AM
Sunday night the Mythbusters show will test the theory that a man armed with a knife can cover seven yards faster than a man can draw and fire a concealed handgun.
Everyone watch.
If you enjoyed reading about "Mythbusters: Bringing a knife to a gun fight." here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
saltydog452
June 7, 2012, 11:42 AM
Can John play?
salty
1KPerDay
June 7, 2012, 11:59 AM
Count how many times they sweep themselves with the guns they use, or wave them around with their fingers on the triggers. Fun drinking game!
Certaindeaf
June 7, 2012, 12:02 PM
I guess the test would be if one can draw and fire (and hit) within 1.5 seconds. Sounds like it'll be a lot of hoopty over such a simple thing
10thMtn
June 7, 2012, 12:10 PM
My favorite part of "The Expendables" is the constant argument that is made over who's quicker -- the knife or the bullet! I know they won't be throwing knives as part of the debate (or maybe they will), but it makes for a bit of fun. From most of the people I've seen going through CC classes over the years, my money is on the knife!!
kBob
June 7, 2012, 12:52 PM
In a class taught by Massad Ayoob I took only one time did the Tueller Drill prove wrong. That is that a knife weilder at 21 feet can advance and knife a guy before a person can draw from a holstered duty rig.
THis is a standard police and private citizen legal defense for shooting a knife wielder and as originally discribed was from a duty holster and not concealed.
It was claimed that the fact that the only kinifeman in the class that was unsussessful was a 67 year old male three weeks after a heart attack made the failed drill non representative.
Ayoob had an interesting film on blades verses guns that was a bit scary.
As some of you are aware I am a gun guy, but things like the Tueller Drill make me respect the knife and other contact weapons and you guys know I carry a (ususally more than one) knife and a cane. I can but hope those Myth Busters don't screw up a good and reasonable defense.
-kBob
and as to knife verses gun in the movies "The Magnificant Seven" comes to mind, though silly.
scramasax
June 7, 2012, 12:56 PM
I'll be recording it. Be driving back from the blade show. Used to be a trainer and in 1000+ classes only got shot once in the foot. By then I hand already done front and back throat cuts and eviscerated him. We were using issue pistols and simunition. I hope that the lessons have saved some lives. It sure surprised a lot of them.
Cheers,
ts
buckhorn_cortez
June 7, 2012, 01:02 PM
Just for fun, do we get to have them try the knife drill with either Jerry Miculek or Todd Jarrett?
Certaindeaf
June 7, 2012, 01:06 PM
^
Some people can draw and fire pretty fast.. don't blink.
rcmodel
June 7, 2012, 01:12 PM
Only if they are expecting an attack, and happen to be wearing the race gun rig under their jacket..
I'd say caught cold with no warning, from a typical CCW holster, none of the above could draw on a 7 yard knife attack in time to do any good.
rc
ClickClickD'oh
June 7, 2012, 01:14 PM
I'm sure they'll build some idiotic robotic test rig that starts the robot with the knife moving at the robot with the gun at the same time and completely fail to realize that human reaction time is a huge factor in the Tueller Drill.
highorder
June 7, 2012, 01:19 PM
I'm sure they'll build some idiotic robotic test rig that starts the robot with the knife moving at the robot with the gun at the same time and completely fail to realize that human reaction time is a huge factor in the Tueller Drill.
Probably. It's entertainment.
Watching the Tueller drill would be boring to most people. Actually performing it might garner a bit more interest, kinda like golf on TV vs. actually swinging the clubs. :)
Arkansas Paul
June 7, 2012, 01:55 PM
Just for fun, do we get to have them try the knife drill with either Jerry Miculek or Todd Jarrett?
Or Bob Munden?
Only if they are expecting an attack, and happen to be wearing the race gun rig under their jacket..
I'd say caught cold with no warning, from a typical CCW holster, none of the above could draw on a 7 yard knife attack in time to do any good.
That's what I like about Bob. He doesn't wear the cut down rigs or use the modified guns with the weird hammers like Cisco does.
However, I agree with the last statement. None of them would fare any better against an unsuspected attack with a gun in a CCW rig. No chance.
Certaindeaf
June 7, 2012, 01:55 PM
Only if they are expecting an attack, and happen to be wearing the race gun rig under their jacket..
I'd say caught cold with no warning, from a typical CCW holster, none of the above could draw on a 7 yard knife attack in time to do any good.
rc
What you say is fairly true. There's little one can do against a dedicated assassin.
joecil
June 7, 2012, 01:57 PM
I saw a training film year ago with the very same point proved. The reason is simple really and also the same reason you don't tail gate at high speed in your car. That is reaction time as it takes time for your eyes to register to the brain what it sees and then the brain to send a signal after convincing the mind what is happening to send a response.
Owen Sparks
June 7, 2012, 02:31 PM
The big difference would be who moves first. If the knife guy starts with the blade in his hand and charges an unsuspecting victim he would be half way there before the shooter even knows what is happening.
If the man with the pistol were allowed to start with it in his hand and initiate the attack there is no way anyone could draw a knife from concealment and sprint seven yards before being shot.
All things being equal with both ready and both drawing their weapons from concealment on command would be interesting as a human being can outrun a drag racer for the first five yards.
The last guy that charged at me (without a knife) caught a front thrust kick in the gut. It turned out to be a case of mistaken identy on his part but even if he had a knife the worst that could have happened to me would have beed a survivable cut on the leg. I easily could have drawn and shot him as he lay on the ground trying to get over having the wind knocked out of him. As it turned out he thought that I was some guy named Lenny who was messing around with his wife. A straight driving kick is really the best way to stall an attack though most people don't practice Karate and could not get their foot up above their waist if their life depended on it. Funny thing is it just might.
Onward Allusion
June 7, 2012, 02:54 PM
Knife will win almost every time against a CC situation as long as the "assailant" is in halfway decent shape. Even in an open carry scenario with the typical snap holster or active retention holster, it is unlikely for the typical person to draw before the knife wielder reaches the shooter. With an open carry tension retention, then there's a good chance for the shooter. Caveat being that the shooter is expecting the knife holder.
Try it with a friend and a red marker as the knife... :)
Certaindeaf
June 7, 2012, 03:02 PM
^
This is perhaps all tremendously precious but a man can pop an unsuspecting grape from afar without moving one step with a firearm. What does this prove?
Onward Allusion
June 7, 2012, 03:22 PM
Certaindeaf
^
This is perhaps all tremendously precious but a man can pop an unsuspecting grape from afar without moving one step with a firearm. What does this prove?
Do the experiment a few times then come back with your results. Not talking race rig. Draw from IWB. Draw from 6 O'Clock & 4 O'Clock with the typical snap retention holster. Do it from a pocket holster.
What does this prove? It proves that one should maintain distance from their assailant regardless of knife, bat, or gun.
Certaindeaf
June 7, 2012, 03:51 PM
^
I understand. So you're saying it's like gravity and a constant. I can accept this. Well, so are most things so what's the point in the exercise of being able to draw and hit in 1.5 seconds save for stoppping some berserker starting from 7 yards? The question still remains.. who is your assailant? Figure that out and you're gold. Just keep fifty yards from everybody? nevermind
Certaindeaf
June 7, 2012, 04:37 PM
It just seems nonsense or contrived to assert/argue about what is apparently taken as a given. If it’s a given, what’s there to assert/argue? All I said, or am trying to say, is sometimes it might be a good thing to be able to draw and hit within 1.5 seconds. Pretty simple.
joecil
June 7, 2012, 05:26 PM
When I was in my early 20's I went to a fair and one of the attractions was a quick draw booth. Now you bought 3 shots for a $1 and if you beat the guy/gal across from you a prize was given.
Now for how it worked. They had a single action pistol in a holster, you was given a double action pistol all was loaded with blanks. Now you have no holster and have to simply pull the trigger before they draw, cock and fire their gun. Now only rule is they got to make the first move so you had to anticipate their slightest move as their hand was about 4" from the gun. Needless to say it cost me $5 before I figure out even though I have fast hands they would win every time if I waited for them to flinch. Now for a while that group, The Gator Gun Fighters of S. Florida had a women that was the nationals quick draw champion. They are fast however I found that if we reversed the rules I could beat them every time. It is a simple fact of nature, response time is slower than someone committed to taking action.
10thMtn
June 7, 2012, 08:57 PM
Let's go one further. Seven feet...facing...knife draw and throw v. draw and shoot. My money is on the knife still if the rules are the same...CC holster v. CC thrower.
Nushif
June 7, 2012, 09:03 PM
A straight driving kick is really the best way to stall an attack though most people don't practice Karate and could not get their foot up above their waist if their life depended on it.
Interestingly enough in some disciplines of karate a kick above the waistline (or more accurately above the midpoint of the thigh) is considered bad economy of motion, by its nature telegraphed and unbalancing, and thus a bad idea in a fight.
10thMtn
June 7, 2012, 09:19 PM
Interestingly enough in some disciplines of karate a kick above the waistline (or more accurately above the midpoint of the thigh) is considered bad economy of motion, by its nature telegraphed and unbalancing, and thus a bad idea in a fight.
You win the prize, sir. In knife defense combatives, THE only kick is the kick to the knees. The kick to the knees not only positions your body away from the blade, it threatens the stability of the attacker and could end the fight quickly. Anything thigh or above leaves an easy target for a slash or stab wound! I appreciate those Martial Arts that believe in high kicks, but they fight with a different set of rules than other arts. I am sure there are a few who are quick enough/powerful enough to pull off an occasional jumping roundhouse to the head, but they are few and far between.
Owen Sparks
June 7, 2012, 10:06 PM
Interestingly enough in some disciplines of karate a kick above the waistline (or more accurately above the midpoint of the thigh)
We never advocate kicking above the solar plexus. Low kicks to the legs and crotch are very effective at hurting an opponant but in order to bodily stop him in a run you must hit him at least belt buckle high, and you must be moving forward. You can't just stick your foot out and stop a charging man. He will bowl you over. You have to have your body weight in motion behind the kick. There have beed several VERY efective examples of a front thrust kick decking a someone in recent MMA fights.
10thMtn
June 7, 2012, 10:47 PM
We never advocate kicking above the solar plexus. Low kicks to the legs and crotch are very effective at hurting an opponant but in order to bodily stop him in a run you must hit him at least belt buckle high, and you must be moving forward. You can't just stick your foot out and stop a charging man. He will bowl you over. You have to have your body weight in motion behind the kick. There have beed several VERY efective examples of a front thrust kick decking a someone in recent MMA fights.
I think we've gotten ourselves into a quandary regarding two different situations. You are describing a stop to a charging target, and I believe Nushif (and my comment supporting him) regards a parrying attack.
In regards to a charging attack with a knife, in Army Knife Defense Combatives, we would not recommend a kick to "stop him in a run." It may work in a MMA fight, but in combat or a knife fight, it will likely end in failure, injury, and possibly death.
I've trained with many SOFs from varying countries, and we all train similarly in this situation -- we want the attacker to charge like this. It is the best of all situations because it is the easiest to defend against. But a trained knife handler will not charge unless you are going to shoot, but again, we've gotten a little off topic, and I'll stop myself from going down this road further. My apologies...
Deltaboy
June 7, 2012, 11:28 PM
You wait and move at the last minute while striking him with your cane then drawing your gun and calling 911.
Mindset and awareness will even the scales with dealing with a determined knife man.
TimboKhan
June 8, 2012, 01:00 AM
You wait and move at the last minute while striking him with your cane then drawing your gun and calling 911.
Mindset and awareness will even the scales with dealing with a determined knife man.
I am a great big giant of a man, and there isn't a whole lot anyone can do to stop even me from covering 7 yards very fast. My hallway happens to be almost exactly that distance, and I can cover that tout suite.
Assuming you weren't kidding, waiting to move at the last minute in a game of seconds is going to result with a knife sticking out of one of your body parts. Plus, you advocate essentially doing three things at the same moment. Mindset is hugely important, awareness is hugely important, but training the kind of skills your advocating here is well beyond just simple mindset and awareness, especially in a high stress, rapid, unexpected attack.
Sheepdog1968
June 8, 2012, 01:11 AM
In an Awebuck class Loui demonstrated this. At 10 yards Loui was just able to get it drawn and a shot off. Loui is a quick draw.
10thMtn
June 8, 2012, 01:25 AM
waiting to move at the last minute in a game of seconds is going to result with a knife sticking out of one of your body parts.
Agree. But that brings up a salient point: what would one do under such situation? Training is the only answer. Training to the point where an attack like this becomes nothing more than an instant reaction guided by muscle memory. As a former Marine, you undoubtedly at least got a taste of this training. However, most people don't go through anything to prepare them. Therefore, the common reaction would be to freeze and panic. Hence, why I don't think most CC persons could draw and fire in time.
But, fortunately, it is highly unlikely anyone will be attacked by a crazed knife-wielder without any provocation! Thank goodness for that!
RatDrall
June 8, 2012, 07:21 AM
You win the prize, sir. In knife defense combatives, THE only kick is the kick to the knees. The kick to the knees not only positions your body away from the blade, it threatens the stability of the attacker and could end the fight quickly. Anything thigh or above leaves an easy target for a slash or stab wound!
Why wouldn't you move off of his center line, so that if his blade does carry through, it hits empty space where you were standing?
Nushif
June 8, 2012, 07:28 AM
Why wouldn't you move off of his center line, so that if his blade does carry through, it hits empty space where you were standing?
I don't think limiting your kick to thigh and lower and moving off the centerline are mutually exclusive. Whereas I think any kind of meaningful movement and chest height kicks are.
Vonderek
June 8, 2012, 07:39 AM
This whole business about split second timing, moving and kicking seems ok if you have that skillset and are in a dojo or MMA ring but doesn't seem like an effective response if you have the misfortune of being in close quarters and limited lighting like a hallway, stairwell, or amongst cars in a crowded parking lot.
Nushif
June 8, 2012, 07:56 AM
Naaaw. "Moving off the line" might just mean slamming your back into a wall, or turning sideways or anything else like that, I don't think most people here are talking about a picture perfect side step thingie. To me at least it just means trying to not be where the knife is coming down at.
When we trained we usually trained for it requiring the least amount of you know ... finesse, pizzaz, skills, you name it.
In an alleyway you can still desperately turn sideways while flailing your leg at the bad guy's knee and then hopefully run off. What that translates to in training is "stepping off the line" and "inducing structural damage to a weight bearing joint" and "creating distance."
But really what is being talked about here is a mad scramble to stay away from the knife edge, hurting the guy's or gal's knee and taking off as fast a you can ot the closest copper. 8)
It's like people here "going to the LGS and purchasing a firearm" instead of going to the gunshop and buying a toy or gun. 8)
10thMtn
June 8, 2012, 08:25 AM
I don't think limiting your kick to thigh and lower and moving off the centerline are mutually exclusive. Whereas I think any kind of meaningful movement and chest height kicks are.
This whole business about split second timing, moving and kicking seems ok if you have that skillset and are in a dojo or MMA ring but doesn't seem like an effective response if you have the misfortune of being in close quarters and limited lighting like a hallway, stairwell, or amongst cars in a crowded parking lot.
Both of these statements are addressing the original situation of a charge with knife. Totally different than what "mentality" is being offered during a "standoff" or parry situation. I was hoping my comment about the confusion would get us back on track...my bad...
Go back to my last post regarding a charge. The Marine and I agree that the only "offensive" move requires lots of training (either military combatives or street-level/serious MA). Most folks don't have that (or like me, have stopped working on it). So, I'm going to be slower, and others are going to freeze.
For most folks, I'd advise (IF this unlikely scenario rears its head) to grab the closest chair or to turn, run, and take cover behind something that puts distance between you and the charging attacker. You're not going to draw and fire in time -- trust me.
For those who are trained, the instinctive move taught FIRST to all SOF personnel is step to the side, rotate torso, deflect knife-holding arm, and counterattack once the motion has been re-routed (hard to write for explanation) but it's the basic **** move taught in this circumstance. There are other options too -- many more. This is usually the first.
fineredmist
June 8, 2012, 08:44 AM
If the situation is two people, 1 armed with a knife and the other a holstered handgun, and the knife holder attackes the shooter may or may not get off a shot. Will the shot instantly put the attacker down? Not likely. The attacker with the knife will be able to inflict some serious damage before he goes down. The probable result will be 2 very seriously wounded people.
It the knife wielder attackes without warning the gunman is on the short end every time. A trained knife fighter can inflict fatal injuries with 1 or 2 well placed hits and the fight is over.
Owen Sparks
June 8, 2012, 09:38 AM
Moving off the center line is a way to dodge the bad guys first attempt but what about the second? He is still healthy and on his feet. Will that buy you enough time to draw and fire? Side stepping and dodging need to be combined with low circular kicks to take the opponants feet out fron under him whenever possible. You can't accomplish this without some momentum either. You should move foreward and off at at a 45 degree angle and 'clothes line' him with your low kick.
PRM
June 8, 2012, 09:44 AM
OK, I see where this is going!!!
Now, I got to add a 21 foot tape measure to my EDC, and figure out how to get the BG armed with a knife to stand still while I measure the distance between us. LOL
I'll keep my gun - engaging a knife wielding attacker with a knife is not on my list. Besides, machetes are not on the CCW list.
A trained knife fighter can inflict fatal injuries with 1 or 2 well placed hits and the fight is over.
Maybe - trained shooters can also end a conflict rather quickly
kBob
June 8, 2012, 11:24 AM
Guys LEOs and trained private citizens have been dealing with the Tueller drill for decades now.
The point is that the odds are if you are confronted with a person with a knife in hand at 7 (seven) yards or less and you take no action then that person can most likely inflict injuries on you. PERIOD. STOP.
The lesson to be learned is to TAKE ACTION. In my state the person has offered you deadly force, I would likely go ahead and draw or atleast "unsnap" and place my hand on the pistol grip in a good fashoin if I were an LEO and would certainly consider it as an armed citizen.
One of the other main points of the Tueller drill was to NOT FIXATE on the firearm. React to the attack in a way likely to have some effect.
10th Mountain states off the attackers line. ABSOLUTELY CORRECT! If I am carrying on my right and the attacker is also right handed I will most likley step to my left while attempting to draw OR PERFORM SOME OTHER DEFENSE.
Stepping to the enmy weapon side makes it harder for him to react to your move.
If possible turn your off side toward the attacker, this guards your own weapon arm and the weapon as it is being drawn. It may well be that you may need to use your off hand to block, parry, or pass the enemy weaponor its arm. While this is likely to cause your off arm to be injured it may give you the time to complete your draw and bring your side arm to bear.
Remember to shoot until the threat has ceased.
With some of us there is an excellent chance that our off hand will be holding a cane.....in which case the firearm just became the secondary weapon of defense though bet your bippy it will come out as soon as possible.
The important things the Tueller drill teaches are.
1. Situational awareness....note that there is a threat
2. begin preparation for defense BEFORE the rush starts
3. do not fixate on one type of defense and keep in mind a firearm is not a magic wand.
Whether or not some bozos on TV can claim decades of LEO experience and training is a myth is besides the point......sometimes myths are excellent teaching tools.
-kBob
'nuff said.
Zoogster
June 8, 2012, 03:16 PM
The Tueller Drill is not to demonstrate that you have already lost inside 7 yards.
The purpose is to instill in the minds of especially LEO that if you have someone within short range with a knife you need to have your gun out (or if with several LEOs some do) because the knife wielder can react faster than you can draw and fire.
However once you have drawn and aimed you no longer need to fire if the person has not rushed towards you. You do at that point have the advantage, of course distance is still your friend.
Once the gun is out and ready the shooter can react faster than the knife wielder. So LEO and others always need to get their gun out of the holster as soon as someone with 10-20 yards is acting hostile with a knife, because they know that within 7 yards the knife will be doing damage if the attacker decides to attack and the gun is not already out.
However once the gun is out and aimed you have control up to I would say at least 3 yards before you need to start shooting.
The issue being resolved by the Tueller Drill was to correct some who would try to reason with a knife wielder inside short range, or try to deploy less lethal options within that range without adequate lethal force backup. Some would know they had a gun to fall back to if other options failed, and so would wait too long before deploying it and be vulnerable. They felt overly confident in being able to fall back on their firearm that was still in its holster.
Also even if someone can in fact reach you, and they do rush you and inflict a wound with a knife, the injuries delivered with the firearm afterwards may prevent additional wounds. So just because the person with a knife can inflict some injury before being shot does not mean they won the fight. The Tueller drills tend to give that impression.
While there is certainly some people good with a knife, most citizens are a lot better with a gun. A bullet penetrates to depth where it is shot, a knife requires the user to create the injury.
So inflicting injury with a gun favors the novice over inflicting injury with a knife.
Someone putting up an active defense can increase the time it takes to get stabs to the torso, and make it more difficult for the attacker to put slashes or stabs where they want. The defender is still going to get cut, potentially bad, but they will have more time to get a gun into play than just the time it takes for the knife wielder to reach them before they are out of the fight.
Not much time, but a second or two extra turns the tables.
Someone can take most of the injuries to extremities trying to keep distance backing up and blocking for an extra second or two while they are deploying their firearm, and then still deliver effective fire that stops the attack.
No injuries is certainly preferable and a better survival strategy, but if the distance is closed an active defense and not just being completely consumed with getting the gun into play can increase the time available to get the gun out by reducing the effectiveness and accuracy of the knife injuries.
sixgunner455
June 8, 2012, 03:46 PM
Out of ~20 regulars at our club shoots, there are 2-3 who could probably get a shot off on someone running at them with a knife before getting cut.
These are every day people, ranging from oldsters to kids in their early twenties. There are three brothers who show up, young guys, very fit, tall, athletic. One of those guys has the speed, coordination, and accuracy to where I think he could prevail, holster to shot. He's usually tops in any stage he shoots - he's just wicked fast and accurate. The other two didn't quite get the genetic combination he did, and are usually halfway down the stats list. The next guy on the list is in his seventies, but he's been playing this game since he was the young buck who could do all that.
The rest of us, it's a crap shoot as to whether or not we'd even get the gun out, but the key for everyone are the things Kbob said: ACT. If you don't, if you wait, you're probably dead.
wheelgunslinger
June 10, 2012, 10:57 AM
meh, nevermind.
Hunter125
June 10, 2012, 11:36 AM
The last guy that charged at me (without a knife) caught a front thrust kick in the gut....A straight driving kick is really the best way to stall an attack
This is what I was thinking about. I would be very interested to see how the Tueller Drill would go if the goal was not to shoot, but to defend. Martial arts trained folks might fare pretty well, but I wonder how the average Joe would do.
zhyla
June 10, 2012, 05:41 PM
I had a "false alarm" incident at work one time. The details don't matter, but out of the blue I had a lot of loud noise and two people charging full speed directly at me from 30 feet away. By the time I had turned around and realized they were (friendly) coworkers just screwing around they were 10 feet away and I had my hand on my knife but hadn't pulled it from my pocket yet. Drawing my pocket knife was my first reaction but I didn't get very far with it until too late.
The problem isn't that I draw a knife slowly or that I draw it slowly under stress. Most of that time was being too slow to react to a sudden change in my surroundings.
Owen Sparks
June 11, 2012, 10:35 AM
The show last night concluded that with both Adam and Jamie ready, the knife man won against the quick draw every time provided he started within 18 feet. It should be noted that he was not drawing from concealment but from a cowboy rig with his hand just a few inches away like in the opening scene of the TV show Gunsmoke.
Owen Sparks
June 11, 2012, 02:30 PM
There is a world of difference between a jumping roundhouse to the head and a simple straight thrust to the lower abdomen. The average healthy person CAN be taught to do this effectivly. I know, I have been teaching it for over 20 years. That being said, the low round kicks to the legs are also very effectice and can literally sweep an opponants feet right out from under him or damage his ACL to the point that he can not walk. In order to use it on a charging opponant you must meet his force with force at a 45 degree angle while moving off to the side geting your head and vitals out of the way and that takes a fair amount of skill and training. There is NOTHING that you can do while standing still that will work as momentum is on his side. Even if you shoot him his body is still coming forward with a knife unless you hit him low in the brain stem. If he only lives a second or two he can still stab you if you don't move or physically stop him with forward momentum of your own.
Movement is the key.
hso
June 11, 2012, 03:46 PM
The objective of the Teuller drill was to teach officers that their previous confidence about what distance they could realistically expect to be able stop an attacker by drawing and firing their weapon were grossly off of reality. It was not to set a fixed distance or be fixed for everyone. It was only intended to break the overconfidence in what was and was not a safe distance.
I've been the "attacker" in many training sessions (and in one impromptu "training" session). Officers who've only watched videos instead of having direct experience in a safe setting are usually overconfident in their ability to use their firearm to deal with a threat within these distances. Armed citizens rarely get any opportunity to learn these lessons and rarely take any steps to learn how to deal with realistic armed attacks that initiate well within these ranges.
If you want to introduce some realism into these drills have 3 or more people play the role of the attacker so the defender doesn't know which one is going to initiate the attack. This is still unrealistic in that the defender knows it is coming. Want to make it more realistic? Run it over and over where no attack occurs before an attack is initiated by one of the multiple possible attackers. You'll see real differences between static and dynamic scenarios and between trained and untrained defenders.
BTW -
"This whole business about split second timing, moving and kicking seems ok if you have that skillset and are in a dojo or MMA ring but doesn't seem like an effective response if you have the misfortune of being in close quarters and limited lighting like a hallway, stairwell, or amongst cars in a crowded parking lot."
Done it in a parking lot at night and it was a close thing. I assure you I attribute my success to luck as well as training.
rcmodel
June 11, 2012, 04:38 PM
I got to think a skinny little crack brained PCP user could run faster for 30 feet then Jamie too!
rc
Lucifer_Sam
June 11, 2012, 04:49 PM
I think the lesson we should all have taken away from that mythbusters episode is that using a rocket to shoot off rocket arrows is really, really cool. And we need to push for legislation allowing us all to do that regularly.
wally
June 11, 2012, 05:08 PM
I'd say caught cold with no warning
Ah, there's the rub. Having a weapon is a necessary but not sufficient condition. Situational awareness to avoid being "caught cold" is the key!
Zoogster
June 11, 2012, 11:09 PM
removed
damoc
June 12, 2012, 12:15 AM
Hi all i normally just chat in the BP section but thought i would chime in here
the saying never bring a knife to a gun fight is such BS anybody serious about self defense should at the very least respect the knife and the knife wielding attacker.
YES i would prefer to have a gun and have practiced with both guns and knives and hand to hand I can still draw a knife from a belt sheath and hit a target out to about 20 feet faster than i can with a gun and that is assuming
i have not already got it palmed or otherwise hidden.
if its under 10 feet unless you have some pretty good self defense skills
to gain time to draw a gun the knife person will in all likelyhood have an advantage especially if the fight gets down to a grapple which most do
knives are
silent
easily hidden
available anywhere
cheap
very reliable (unless you buy china garbage)
never need reloading (just the occasional hone)
easily improvised
like i said i would prefer a gun because of the multiple shot and range advantages and also because of lethality advantages of a gun for self defense.
but any idiot that purveys the (dont bring a knife to a gun fight) is displaying a total lack of knowledge and respect for the humble knife and that could get YOU killed.
blarby
June 12, 2012, 01:11 AM
If you want to introduce some realism into these drills have 3 or more people play the role of the attacker so the defender doesn't know which one is going to initiate the attack. This is still unrealistic in that the defender knows it is coming. Want to make it more realistic? Run it over and over where no attack occurs before an attack is initiated by one of the multiple possible attackers. You'll see real differences between static and dynamic scenarios and between trained and untrained defenders.
Hso for the win again....
Cocked & Locked
June 12, 2012, 08:56 AM
The defender (drawing his gun) has even less of a chance of survival or being filleted if he...
1) has to move clothing out of the way to reach his gun
2) is using a holster with a snap strap or other retention device
3) has a gun with a safety to disengage
4) has a gun with hammer, "beaver tail", or sight that can snag on clothing
1911Tuner
June 12, 2012, 09:29 AM
The exercise is designed and intended to make us aware that the gun isn't a guarantee. No more and no less.
I devised a game that I call "Beat the Drop" that I've used to demonstrate that when pointing a gun at somebody who is holding a gun in one hand, pointed at the ground, you can still get shot before you can get off a shot in time to stop him. It's been a real eye-opener for many...including a couple of high-speed/low-drag SWAT/SET professionals.
The seasoned blade man isn't going to announce that he has a knife and intends to take a run at you from 20 feet or 10 feet. He's going to work in as close as he can without tipping his hand...and he's going to cut you to ribbons in about 10 seconds while you're still trying to process the fact that you're being cut. He isn't interested in fighting a duel. His goal is to win. He operates on the old dictum that the best fight is the one that's over before the loser realizes that it's started.
Owen Sparks
June 12, 2012, 10:31 AM
I think this experiment gives a fairly accurate representation of what you could expect in a real knife attack (provided you saw it coming). Some may argue that Adam is not as quick on the draw as they are. This may be true, but then Jamie is no track star either. These are just two average men with average skills demonstraiting what could happen.
Deltaboy
June 12, 2012, 11:59 AM
I am a great big giant of a man, and there isn't a whole lot anyone can do to stop even me from covering 7 yards very fast. My hallway happens to be almost exactly that distance, and I can cover that tout suite.
Assuming you weren't kidding, waiting to move at the last minute in a game of seconds is going to result with a knife sticking out of one of your body parts. Plus, you advocate essentially doing three things at the same moment. Mindset is hugely important, awareness is hugely important, but training the kind of skills your advocating here is well beyond just simple mindset and awareness, especially in a high stress, rapid, unexpected attack.
Sorry but I was not kidding. Be aware of what is going on lets you set you body for a T stance which alows you to side step easily the cane should already be at the ready and after you have side stepped then struck him you can back away draw and dail 911.
I'm sorry but I didn't intend to present those steps as happening at the same time but over a period of seconds.
Plus being trapped in a narrow alley or hall calls for different actions.
damoc
June 12, 2012, 08:42 PM
Sorry but I was not kidding. Be aware of what is going on lets you set you body for a T stance which alows you to side step easily the cane should already be at the ready and after you have side stepped then struck him you can back away draw and dail 911.
I'm sorry but I didn't intend to present those steps as happening at the same time but over a period of seconds.
Plus being trapped in a narrow alley or hall calls for different actions.
ROFL
Nematocyst
June 12, 2012, 11:20 PM
Subscribed.
Owen Sparks
June 13, 2012, 12:50 PM
I recently taught a seminar on stick fighting and demonstraited, using a foam rubber boffer and rubber knife, that a knife is no match for a 3' stick. It is really easy to side-step and whack the knife man from way out of his range. The thing that makes a walking cane so fast is the fact that you already have it in hand. If you know how to hold it in any one of the three carry methods we teach it can be put into action within a second. We tell the students: "Think of yourself as a bull fighter, not the bull."
Cosmoline
June 13, 2012, 01:23 PM
I'm very much afraid of knives. They're quiet and can inflict very nasty bleeding wounds. Forget someone charging at you with an "aieeeee!", I'm worried about the guy who comes up behind you to ask a question then nails you under the rib.
But that said, a distinction needs to be drawn in this drills between a sort of fencing slash with a magic marker and a viable killing stroke. Just because someone gets to you in time to make a mark on some part of your anatomy doesn't mean you'll be dead. Or that you'll die instantly.
But the reciprocal contact shot from a magnum to the knife wielder's torso? That one he ain't walking away from.
Owen Sparks
June 13, 2012, 01:42 PM
Face it, if someone wants you dead and you don't know it, they have a tremendous advantage. Knife, gun, club, it does not matter much if they have the drop on you.
memphisjim
June 13, 2012, 02:15 PM
A lot of this depends on the shooter standing still Circling would greatly increase the time you have
10thMtn
June 13, 2012, 02:22 PM
Face it, if someone wants you dead and you don't know it, they have a tremendous advantage. Knife, gun, club, it does not matter much if they have the drop on you.
True! I keep hearing this person say 3' stick, that person say a quick draw rig, and another say a cane. Almost always it seems people talk as if they're facing the attack and are prepared for it -- as if on alert. In a combat situation, you're always on alert. Walking out of the movies with your date, however, and I'll bet you're not. There's a lot of different martial arts/combatives with lots of good moves for a knife attack, but none of them matter if you're not always on alert and always aware of your surroundings. In the Army, we routinely placed unusual items around and about training areas, living quarters, rec facilities, etc. -- anywhere trainees would be during the day (some when they were alert, and some where they weren't). We'd stop them after they walked through the "set-up" and ask them to name the objects they passed. You'd be surprised how many failed the test until they were trained to observe surroundings constantly. What does this mean? Failure or success relies less in the technique you use to defend and counter-attack and more in your awareness of your surroundings. Think about it.
Owen Sparks
June 13, 2012, 02:31 PM
If someone really has it out for you they could take you out with a scoped rifle. Hopefully the chances of something like that happening are slim for most of us.
blarby
June 14, 2012, 12:57 AM
But the reciprocal contact shot from a magnum to the knife wielder's torso? That one he ain't walking away from.
If I for some reason wished you harm, and was able to get close enough to you to make any "anatomy marks"...you wouldn't be walking away from that either.
Any decent knife wielder could say the same thing.
The scary part is, it isn't hard to possess such proficiency with a blade.
The sad part is, you would have to train for a lifetime to be able to defend from such an attack with a firearm successfully.
Nematocyst
June 14, 2012, 01:13 AM
I keep hearing this person say 3' stick, that person say a quick draw rig, and another say a cane. Almost always it seems people talk as if they're facing the attack and are prepared for it -- as if on alert. In a combat situation, you're always on alert.
50 million years ago, or 500 million years ago, the animals that survived were those that were always on alert. They were attuned to the tiniest sounds of a cracking twig on the ground, or a slight change in ambient smell, or something moving in their peripheral vision, whether a leaf blowing in a breeze or a large predator. By being alert to those, they survived - natural selection - and passed their genes onto their offspring.
Problem today is, like Lawrence Gonzales points out in his book Everyday Survival (http://books.google.com/books?id=j9O5SWybAJ0C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false) (subtitle: Why Smart People Do Stupid Things), we are in "a vacation state of mind". In modern society, we think that we are safe, that we have eliminated the risks associated with life.
We are not safe.
Until we understand that there are predators afoot, that they walk among us, and that they are paying attention to us whether we see them or not, even if not today or tomorrow or next week or next year, but soon enough, then we will do stupid things.
Pay attention to your surroundings every second, regardless of whether you are on a dark street in the ghetto (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDCxH88-9X8) at 3 am or in the mall at noon.
Otherwise, whether you carry an 18" stick, a 5" blade, or a .44, you may be deselected.
Carl N. Brown
June 14, 2012, 02:29 AM
As I remember it, in The Untouchables when Malone scoffs "Brings a knife to a gun fight" at the knife weilding assasin, Malone runs with a sawn-off shotgun into a Tommygun ambush. Which I guess could lead to another cliche, "Bring enough gun".
If you enjoyed reading about "Mythbusters: Bringing a knife to a gun fight." here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.