Ruger Mark III. which one?


PDA






jimbombo
July 19, 2012, 10:08 PM
Hello. Looking to get a nice range gun. Really like the look and feel of the mkIII. But cannot decide between the markIII standard barrel or bull barrel, or the mkIII 22/45. ?

Anybody have experience with the different models and can point out the positives and negatives of the standard vs bull barrel, and is the polymer grip of the 22/45 a concern or negative over the steel grip of the mkIII( i am already comfortable with both grip angles, i am just talking durability of the polymer over the steel grip)..

Thanks.

If you enjoyed reading about "Ruger Mark III. which one?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Upstater
July 19, 2012, 10:13 PM
I personally chose a bull barrel it makes a very nice target pistol when accompanied by a red dot scope.

rswartsell
July 19, 2012, 10:15 PM
The 22/45 was designed as a purpose driven piece to provide inexpensive practice for 1911 shooters (it wil also perform other roles admirably), if that's not a concern I like the bull barrel steel grip frames. Not because of any durability issues though. I doubt very much that durability would ever be a practical concern for the 22/45.

Pilot
July 20, 2012, 05:33 AM
MK II 5.5 inch bull barrel Target model.

777TRUTH
July 20, 2012, 05:50 AM
I am very happy with my 22/45 MKIII Target. There are a couple of things I need to work on to get the pistol where I really want it to be.

First is to remove the mag disconnect.

Thedub88
July 20, 2012, 08:33 AM
http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/6650/img20120401193235.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/341/img20120401193235.jpg/)


This is the standard hunter I got the Majestic arms 3.2 speed strip kit. what ever gun you get, get this strip kit
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/243182/majestic-arms-32-speed-strip-kit-ruger-mark-i-ii-iii-22-45

mahansm
July 20, 2012, 11:21 AM
MK III (or II) 678, with the 6 7/8 heavy taper barrel. It's only available as the target model, with adjustable sights. Balances like the 5.5 bull barrel but the longer barrel/sight radius gives me better accuracy and slightly more velocity.

MrBorland
July 20, 2012, 11:24 AM
Personally, I prefer the grip angle of the standard MkIII.

I wanted to try Bullseye shooting, so I got the 5.5" bull barrel, which gave me the option of using the stock Patridge target sight, or an UltraDot, and didn't feel muzzle-heavy. Love the gun, but haven't yet gotten to a bullseye match. :o

Irons (from a recent THR postal match (http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=657990)):
http://i415.photobucket.com/albums/pp239/becke016/GunsTargets/May2012PostalRuger.jpg

1" Ultra Dot:
http://i415.photobucket.com/albums/pp239/becke016/GunsTargets/RugerUltaDot20yards.jpg

mdauben
July 20, 2012, 12:57 PM
Hello. Looking to get a nice range gun. Really like the look and feel of the mkIII. But cannot decide between the markIII standard barrel or bull barrel, or the mkIII 22/45. ?
For a target range gun, I would always go with the bull barrel. The extra mass makes it a bit easier to hold steady (plus it looks cooler!). As far as the standard Mk III vs the 22/45, AFAIK the only realy difference is the grip; the original pistol was designed to mimic the grip of the old German Luger, while the 22/45 is intended to mimic the grip of the 1911. Its going to be totally subjective which is "best" so just handle both and decide which one feels better in your hand.

ForumSurfer
July 20, 2012, 01:04 PM
For a target range gun, I would always go with the bull barrel. The extra mass makes it a bit easier to hold steady (plus it looks cooler!).

I agree. I don't think the bull barrel is going to give you any measurable benefit outside of looks and a little more heft to help steady it (on a 22 pistol, anyway). The only real benefit it gives you is the ability to have a target crown, which does make a difference. I shoot the wheels off of my 22's and I love to let newcomers shoot them as well as carry them through the woods, so having a recessed target crown protects it from the occasional "whoops" that may or may not happen.

340PD
July 20, 2012, 01:36 PM
I use my Hunter as a training gun for beginners. Everyone seems to shoot it well. I have replaced all the innards with Volquartzen parts. It is as accurate as any gun I have ever owned, including my Hammerli and Benelli bullseye guns.

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t320/gnystrom_photos/RugerMkIIIHunter.jpg

Greg528iT
July 20, 2012, 03:05 PM
ANY.. :)
I like the grip angle of the standard Mark III, but do notice I do have to shift modes from my 1911 and back. When I handed my Mark III bull barrel with red dot on top, he had a heck of a time finding the dot, cause he had just been shooting a glock and 1911, Though with the glock it shoulda been closer. SO.. there probably IS a good reason to have same same grip angles. I was initially turned off by the plastic grip frame.

If/when I buy another Ruger 22.. it WILL have the threaded barrel. I expect I'll pick up a supressor here sooner or later and having the Ruger ready to go will facilitate that. I believe that Ruger only offers the threaded barrels on the 22/45s and not the Mark IIIs.

FireInCairo
July 20, 2012, 04:26 PM
The new "lite" version looks like a winner.

tuj
July 21, 2012, 07:30 AM
http://renkucorp.com/jf/pics/guns/ruger/IMG_20120601_182722sm.jpg

If you enjoyed reading about "Ruger Mark III. which one?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!