Sig 220 Carry

I'm going to buy a Sig 220 Carry for CC. I narrowed it down to two, either the 220 SAS Generation II Nitron or the 220 Equinox. I just can't decide which one, I'm 51% for the SAS, it looks "ALL business" and I like the idea of "no rail". Then I look at the EQ, WOW, what a good looking gun, then it becomes 51%. I'd like to know your opinion? :):)

SAS... that Equinox is going to get scratched, worn, and dirty being carried.... Wouldn't want to do that to such a gorgeous gun, would you?

I see no reason for a rail on a CCW pistol. A home defense pistol? Yes.

Another vote for the SAS. For a carry gun, it's the way to go.

The SAS models are designed for carry. There are no sharp edges or anything to get hung up on. If this is going to be a daily carry for you, get the SAS, you won't be disappointed.

I like the potential versatility that a rail offers so I'd go that direction. You want not want the rail now but maybe later you will.

220 Equinox !!! Thats been my main carry for 6 months now. I like the "LOOK" !!!!

...what a good looking gun...

Will you be carrying openly? A good looking gun carried concealed is kind of silly unless you just enjoy admiring it when you're home.

Thanks for the replies, I agree with the majority, the SAS Carry. I think it is a "good looker" too. It reminds me of the Smith M19 snub...everything you need and nothing you don't.

unless you just enjoy admiring it when you're home.

I do that a lot. :o But then, when it comes to looks, I buy things I like to look at, not for what I think others might like to see.