Why can't we discuss potential political consequences of the CT shooting?


PDA






Balrog
December 16, 2012, 10:52 PM
The thread was closed after about 4 posts. Diane Feinstein has said she will introduce a new weapons ban on the 1st day of the new session of Congress.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/16/dianne-feinstein-assault-weapons-ban_n_2311477.html

Obama has said he will do everything legally and politically possible to prevent more shootings.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-newtown-t-tolerate-anymore-022115820--politics.html


Yet we cant discuss it here? I know a lot of people love Obama. But come on, if this is a pro-gun forum, we need to be able to discuss these things. Of course, I am probably going to be banned for this.... but come on moderators, there was no reason to suppress discussion.

If you enjoyed reading about "Why can't we discuss potential political consequences of the CT shooting?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Art Eatman
December 16, 2012, 11:03 PM
IMO, it makes more sense to wait until we can review the text of Sen. Feinstein's bill in order to determine its meaning.

In the meantime, keep an eye out for a companion bill in the House.

As for whatever the president might do, all we can do is wait and see whatever definitive comments or actions occur.

Otherwise, it's mostly mouth-music, speculation and mental masturbation.

In the meantime, set up the format for your snail-mail letter to your own senators and your representative. Letters are far more effective than Internet posts.

hso
December 17, 2012, 01:08 AM
You mean this thread going on in Legal about Senator Feinstein's annual AWB bill?
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=689544

If you enjoyed reading about "Why can't we discuss potential political consequences of the CT shooting?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!