Linn County Sheriff Sends letter to Biden - No intent to enforce


PDA






Big Boy
January 15, 2013, 09:02 PM
Hopefully this copied image is big enough to read. If not you can read it right on Linn County Sheriff's facebook.

Tim Mueller, Linn County Sheriff of Oregon has written a letter to Vice President Joe Biden. Any new gun legislation passed by EO or otherwise he refuses to enforce, or to allow any federal officer to enforce them in his county.

https://www.facebook.com/LinnSheriff

EDIT and UPDATE: This is now spreading to other Sheriff counties in Oregon, as well as a Sheriff in Johnson County, Missouri. His letter can be seen in post 39 (http://www.thehighroad.org/showpost.php?p=8658143&postcount=39) or bellow the letter or Tim Mueller in this post. Start writing your Sheriff's!


January 14th, 2013

Vice President Joe Biden
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washingotn DC 20501


Dear Mr. Vice President

I am Sheriff Tim Muelle, elected twice by the citizens of Linn County, Oregon who have entrusted me
with a noble cause: to keep them and their families safe. My deputies and I take that responsibility very
seriously and like you, have sworn to support the Constitution of the United States. I take that oath
equally as serious as protecting our citizens. I have worked for the people of Linn County for over 28
years as a member of the Linn County Sheriff's Office as well as serving three years active duty as a
Military Police Office in the US Army, where I also swore a similar oath.

In the wake of the recent criminal events, politicians are attempting to exploit the deaths of innocent
victims by advocating for laws that would prevent honest, law abiding Americans from possessing certain
firearms and ammunition magazines. We are Americans. We must not allow, nor shall we tolerate, the
actions of criminals, no matter how heinous the crimes, to prompt politicians to enact laws that will
infringe upon the liberties of responsible citizens who have broken no laws.

Any federal regulation enacted by Congress or by executive order of the President offending the
constitutional rights of my citizens shall not be enforced by me or by my deputies, nor will I permit the
enforcement of any unconstitutional regulations or orders by federal officers within the borders on Linn County Oregon

In summary, it is the position of this Sheriff that I refuse to participate, or stand idly by, while my citizens
are turned into criminals due to the unconstitutional actions of misguided politicians.


Respectfully
Sherrif Tim Mueller

http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a58/CB-AARON/397593_539550812730439_1071298538_n_zpsec473fd2.jpg


And now from Charles M. Heiss of Johnson County, Mo.


January 16, 2013

The Honorable Barak Obama
President United States of America
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President,

My name is Charles M. Heiss and I am the Sheriff of Johnson County, Missouri. I have held this office since January 1, 1997. I am writing to you to express my concern with the tone of your administration with respect to the Second Amendment Rights of American citizens. It appears to me and many Americans that there is a genuine desire on the part of your administration to restrict the Second Amendment rights of law abiding American citizens in the interest of curbing gun violence in our nation.

Throughout our nations history the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights has served as the very foundation of our free society. The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution has long guaranteed our citizens the right to keep and bear arms and is central to our ability to live in a free society. Any attempt to restrict these Second Amendment rights through executive order is unconstitutional and tantamount to an all out assault on the United States Constitution. Just as the Fourth Amendment to the constitution guarantees our citizens the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable search and seizure, the Second Amendment guarantees each of us the right to keep and bear arms to protect ourselves from anyone who would seek to cause us harm. This includes the federal Government.
World history has shown us that when a society does not possess the ability to defend itself it becomes ripe for victimization by criminals, and ripe for government oppression. One need not look too far in today’s world to see glaring examples of defenseless people being brutalized by rogue regimes and dictators. Syria, North Korea, and Mali are just a few examples of this type of oppression. Mexico is a stark reminder of a society overrun with criminal element in the form of Drug Cartels.

As the duly elected Sheriff of Johnson County, Missouri, it is my sworn duty to protect and defend the Constitutions of the United States of America, and the State of Missouri against all enemies both foreign and domestic. This means I not only have the duty to protect my constituents from incidents of crime, but I also have a duty and responsibility to protect and preserve the individual rights and liberties afforded and guaranteed to every citizen by our constitutions. This, Mr. President is a duty I fully understand, appreciate, and will carry out with great vigor and conviction. I will most certainly urge my fellow Sheriffs in the State of Missouri and across this great nation to rise to the defense and aid of all Americans should the federal government attempt to enact any legislation, or executive order that impedes, erodes, or otherwise diminishes their constitutional right to keep and bear arms. I will use all means legal to meet this solemn and sacred responsibility.

Respectfully,
Charles M. Heiss
Sheriff Johnson County, Missouri.

If you enjoyed reading about "Linn County Sheriff Sends letter to Biden - No intent to enforce" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Big Boy
January 15, 2013, 09:39 PM
Took a second and typed it out.

CZsp01
January 15, 2013, 09:42 PM
When these popular letters circulate I wonder if the recipient even bother reading it?

Okiegunner
January 15, 2013, 09:43 PM
In Oregon no less!!

Good for you Sheriff!!!

Apachedriver
January 15, 2013, 09:44 PM
OP - recheck para. 3

ETA: Jackson County, KY Sheriff said pretty much the same on Fox News earlier today.

Byrd666
January 15, 2013, 09:45 PM
KUDOS to Sherrif Tim Mueller

cfullgraf
January 15, 2013, 09:47 PM
I admire the sheriff's initiative, but it will change when all federal funding in his county dries up.

grubbylabs
January 15, 2013, 09:51 PM
I don't see any thing but bad coming from all of this. I feel for the officers who are told they will have to enforce laws like this. I hope they have the good sense to resign their positions instead of going against the constitution.

herkyguy
January 15, 2013, 09:52 PM
please tell me the grammar errors aren't in his letter to the VP.

Pointshoot
January 15, 2013, 09:56 PM
I used to live there. Good for that Sheriff !

I know that Sheriff Richard Mack was giving talks in the Pac NW, I wonder
if he made it to Linn County Oregon.

Big Boy
January 15, 2013, 09:58 PM
please tell me the grammar errors aren't in his letter to the VP.

That was just me typing to fast, believe I have fixed them.

oneounceload
January 15, 2013, 10:04 PM
You missed a part when you typed - the part about any EO or law not being enforced by his folks

HILLBILLY-06
January 15, 2013, 10:04 PM
What's as important is we are reading it, and reposting it on facebook and other forums as well....

KMatch
January 15, 2013, 10:05 PM
No, your paragraph before the summary is missing a few sentences, it appears.

Stress_Test
January 15, 2013, 10:06 PM
This is the last hope, in New York and anywhere else that imposes such draconian laws; that the police will refuse to enforce these laws.

I don't see that happening in New York though...

Big Boy
January 15, 2013, 10:14 PM
No, your paragraph before the summary is missing a few sentences, it appears.

Fixed.

Dang I had a lot of mistakes in there :banghead: Not very easy typing something and reading something side by side on a computer screen, no hard copy. Friggin .pdf's and the inability to copy text :rolleyes:

ApacheCoTodd
January 15, 2013, 10:14 PM
While I appreciate his and other's stances - I have yet to have gotten sideways with a Sheriff's dept in relation to firearms regulation.

Always been municipal, state or federal.

But I am diggin' these Sheriffs. Too bad Maricopa's won't stand up. I figure his shoe-in won't be so certain next time around for it!

MachIVshooter
January 15, 2013, 10:20 PM
I have yet to have gotten sideways with a Sheriff's dept in relation to firearms regulation.

Always been municipal, state or federal.

When you're one of us who lives outside of town limits, the county sheriff is who you'll deal with. If a town cop showed up at my place acting officially, I'd laugh at him and tell him to pound sand.

ApacheCoTodd
January 15, 2013, 10:29 PM
Too true. I've been buttonholed a couple times (always in the right so far) outside the usual jurisdictions - in fact our shop is currently in a county annex surrounded by three municipalities - yet the Sheriff's Office still leaves us be and anyone we have dealt with has been state or federal.

DoubleMag
January 15, 2013, 11:05 PM
UNLIKE OUR REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP IN THE HOUSE...

A guy with some, well, intestinal fortitude

GOOD

JOB!!

Prophet
January 15, 2013, 11:11 PM
I was discussing the topic of states refusing to implement federal laws or EU's with a friend recently. Is there any credibility to using the Mack Vs. US case on this issue?

...not to say that the state and its citizens couldn't still play the bully game both ways and make it virtually impossible for the federal gov't to enforce gun laws by refusing local aid, even if the federal gov't seems to think it can override state sovereignty. Sheriffs also retain the right to refuse to enforce federal gun laws (Mack vs. US). "You instituted the law, you enforce it by yourself and we're not helping" vs. "we're going to prosecute if you enforce this." Such a distinction might allow the states to avoid federal legal action and having their funding dangled in front of them. Of course, maybe it's time for the states to be bold and say "screw the federal gov'ts reaction, we're going to assert our sovereignty no matter the consequence". The more states that adopt either sentiment into law the better imo. Even though in the short term some of the laws might be doomed in court, it still sends a message to the federal gov't that it will be totally on its own if it tries to circumvent the 2A...

allaroundhunter
January 15, 2013, 11:24 PM
A Texas representative is trying to push a law through similar to this:


A Texas lawmaker says he plans to file the Firearms Protection Act, which would make any federal laws that may be passed by Congress or imposed by Presidential order which would ban or restrict ownership of semi-automatic firearms or limit the size of gun magazines illegal in the state, 1200 WOAI news reports.

Republican Rep. Steve Toth says his measure also calls for felony criminal charges to be filed against any federal official who tries to enforce the rule in the state.

"If a federal official comes into the state of Texas to enforce the federal executive order, that person is subject to criminal prosecution," Toth told 1200 WOAI's Joe Pags Tuesday. He says his bill would make attempting to enforce a federal gun ban in Texas punishable by a $50,000 fine and up to five years in prison.

I have a thread with a link to the story here (http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=696122).

oldbear
January 15, 2013, 11:43 PM
I applaud sheriff Mueller’s brave stance, regarding his decision to have his deputies enforce or not enforce any pending legislation. I do have two problems with his decision; Sheriff Mueller took an oath to uphold the law, not just the laws he approves of. Second sheriff Mueller may be in for quite an unpleasant surprise if he actively attempts to stop or obstruct any Federal law enforcement officer who is acting under color of law.

Please folks try and remember the last 4 + weeks have been some of the most trying and disturbing times I can remember in years. I read and heard normal and sane people say some of the most outlandish things. If there is one time we have to take the “high road” and present ourselves as calm cool sane and rational adults this is it.

jakk280rem
January 16, 2013, 12:19 AM
I'm going to be contacting my Sheriff about this. I live in Marion County, adjacent to Linn. It'll be interesting what he says.

InkEd
January 16, 2013, 12:25 AM
Awesome.

Flintknapper
January 16, 2013, 07:43 AM
Please folks try and remember the last 4 + weeks have been some of the most trying and disturbing times I can remember in years. I read and heard normal and sane people say some of the most outlandish things.


If there is one time we have to take the “high road” and present ourselves as calm cool sane and rational adults this is it.


No Sir!

The time for that has passed. We are watching (calm, cool and rationally) as our rights are being eroded away by folks who do NOT act calmly, cool-ly or rationally.

There is a time to meet fire with fire. I submit we are there!

tarosean
January 16, 2013, 07:48 AM
The time for that has passed. We are watching (calm, cool and rationally) as our rights are being eroded away by folks who do NOT act calmly, cool-ly or rationally.

Exactly.... If anyone bothered to watch the NY proceedings yesterday, it was clearly evident they didnt care about facts, figures or a single darn thing other than getting their half baked law, passed and beating Congress to the punch.

herkyguy
January 16, 2013, 09:18 AM
That was just me typing to fast, believe I have fixed them.
thanks for clarifying. The Sheriff was on national news this morning. just goes to show that NOT everyone in public service is screwed up.

NeuseRvrRat
January 16, 2013, 09:25 AM
I admire the sheriff's initiative, but it will change when all federal funding in his county dries up.


that would be another win for the constitution. the federal govt has state and local govts by the balls due to federal funding. this isn't how it's supposed to work.

Trent
January 16, 2013, 10:05 AM
My patience, too, is wearing thin. It's harder to maintain a "nice face", and it's showing.

Nushif
January 16, 2013, 10:31 AM
That's one county over form me.

jakk280rem
January 16, 2013, 05:14 PM
Just recieved a text alert from OFF. Looks like several other Oregon sherifs have stepped forward with letters to Vice Presiden Biden concerning their stance on the administrations efforts.

Oregon Firearms Federation
PO Box 556
Canby, OR 97013

Voice: (503) 263-5830

http://www.oregonfirearms.org
OFF ALERT 01.16.13
OBAMA ANNOUNCES GUN BAN.MORE SHERIFFS SAY “NO."


Today Obama announced his proposals to punish law abiding gun owners in America, partly by bypassing Congress with executive orders and also with a push for a new ban on firearms and magazines. This is the man who starts every speech with “no one wants to take your guns.”

His proposals include an end to private sales and greater Federal intrusions into mental health records.

As you no doubt know, Sheriff Tim Mueller of Linn County has written a letter to Joe Biden saying he would not enforce unconstitutional gun laws. According to KGW news, Crook County Sheriff Jim Hensley said Tuesday he sent the same letter to the Vice President.

Now Sheriff Glenn Palmer of Grant County has joined them. Things are going to get a lot more interesting.


To see his letter, use the link below.

http://oregonfirearms.org/2013/2013gunban/palmerletter.pdf


To contact your own sheriff and tell him to get on board, use the map at the bottom of this link:

http://oregonfirearms.org/chlcentral/
_________________________________________________

Did someone forward this to you? To receive the most up to date information consider subscribing directly to the Oregon Firearms Federation e-mail list.
The volume of mail usually is quite low. If you have trouble opening links in this e-mail please see the alerts page on our website for the latest alert. Please do not respond to this e-mail. To contact OFF please write to "off@oregonfirearms.org"

To subscribe to, or to be removed from the OFF E-mail Alert list please go to:

http://server33.webnation.us/mailman/listinfo/offmail

____________________________________________
OFFMail Alert System

esheato
January 16, 2013, 05:42 PM
I sent a letter to Sheriff Mueller lauding his efforts.

Kevin Rohrer
January 16, 2013, 06:46 PM
On a similar note, I talked to my Sheriff. He has received LOTS of emails and phone calls from people who are extremely upset over what Obummer is trying to do, and they won't put up with anyone trying to take their guns away.

The Sheriff said he takes orders from no one--except his wife. :evil:

Thor88
January 16, 2013, 07:01 PM
It appears Sheriff Jim Hensley has stated the same.

PRINEVILLE, Ore. (AP) -- Another Oregon sheriff says he would refuse to enforce any new federal gun law he believes is unconstitutional.

Crook County Sheriff Jim Hensley said Tuesday he sent the same letter to Vice President Joe Biden that was sent Monday by Linn County Sheriff Tim Mueller.

The letter says politicians are attempting to exploit the deaths of innocent victims in the Connecticut school shooting by supporting laws that would harm law-abiding Americans.

Hensley told KTVZ he believes in the Second Amendment, and he says officials should consider other factors that may have a role in mass shootings, such as violent video games.

krupparms
January 16, 2013, 09:30 PM
The Sheriff's of Josephine & Jackson have also come out &said they would not go along with Mr. Obama! Looks like he may have not have the backing he thought he did! :)

Malamute
January 16, 2013, 09:32 PM
I applaud sheriff Mueller’s brave stance, regarding his decision to have his deputies enforce or not enforce any pending legislation. I do have two problems with his decision; Sheriff Mueller took an oath to uphold the law, not just the laws he approves of. Second sheriff Mueller may be in for quite an unpleasant surprise if he actively attempts to stop or obstruct any Federal law enforcement officer who is acting under color of law.....



If he took an oath to defend the Constitution, then his opinion of a law can have a bearing, and be based on that. The Constitution should have preference over any particular law. If any law is in direct conflict with the constitution, any law enforcement officer (at any level) should refuse to enforce it. That can start to sound like the issue with the German soldiers in WWII, "I was just following orders". Not good enough.

What if the Sheriff was called upon to enforce a law such as Harry Belafonte suggested, to "act like a 3rd world dictator and arrest and throw in jail anyone that criticises the Pres, so he can get on with his good work" without interferance? Would such a law (assuming it was a law) be open to refusal to enforce because it was patently unconstitutional? I believe it would be.

tyeo098
January 16, 2013, 09:33 PM
Can we get a canned letter to send to out respective county sheriffs asking them to pledge the same support?

Big Boy
January 16, 2013, 10:19 PM
HELL YES THIS IS SPREADING STATES

I used to live in Johnson County, this is good stuff!

https://www.facebook.com/jocomosheriff

An open letter sent to the President this morning from Sheriff Heiss:


January 16, 2013

The Honorable Barak Obama
President United States of America
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President,

My name is Charles M. Heiss and I am the Sheriff of Johnson County, Missouri. I have held this office since January 1, 1997. I am writing to you to express my concern with the tone of your administration with respect to the Second Amendment Rights of American citizens. It appears to me and many Americans that there is a genuine desire on the part of your administration to restrict the Second Amendment rights of law abiding American citizens in the interest of curbing gun violence in our nation.

Throughout our nations history the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights has served as the very foundation of our free society. The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution has long guaranteed our citizens the right to keep and bear arms and is central to our ability to live in a free society. Any attempt to restrict these Second Amendment rights through executive order is unconstitutional and tantamount to an all out assault on the United States Constitution. Just as the Fourth Amendment to the constitution guarantees our citizens the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable search and seizure, the Second Amendment guarantees each of us the right to keep and bear arms to protect ourselves from anyone who would seek to cause us harm. This includes the federal Government.
World history has shown us that when a society does not possess the ability to defend itself it becomes ripe for victimization by criminals, and ripe for government oppression. One need not look too far in today’s world to see glaring examples of defenseless people being brutalized by rogue regimes and dictators. Syria, North Korea, and Mali are just a few examples of this type of oppression. Mexico is a stark reminder of a society overrun with criminal element in the form of Drug Cartels.

As the duly elected Sheriff of Johnson County, Missouri, it is my sworn duty to protect and defend the Constitutions of the United States of America, and the State of Missouri against all enemies both foreign and domestic. This means I not only have the duty to protect my constituents from incidents of crime, but I also have a duty and responsibility to protect and preserve the individual rights and liberties afforded and guaranteed to every citizen by our constitutions. This, Mr. President is a duty I fully understand, appreciate, and will carry out with great vigor and conviction. I will most certainly urge my fellow Sheriffs in the State of Missouri and across this great nation to rise to the defense and aid of all Americans should the federal government attempt to enact any legislation, or executive order that impedes, erodes, or otherwise diminishes their constitutional right to keep and bear arms. I will use all means legal to meet this solemn and sacred responsibility.

Respectfully,
Charles M. Heiss
Sheriff Johnson County, Missouri.

jakk280rem
January 17, 2013, 01:36 AM
Looks like we're picking up some speed. But now that Dear Leader has kicked the can down the road, is it all a bit of a waste, or misdirected? Is there anything we can do to ensure that our reps are getting the message that our sheriffs are sending to the wrong white house?

KAS1981
January 17, 2013, 02:14 AM
In Oregon no less!!

Good for you Sheriff!!!
Shouldn't surprise you, Oregon has some of the least restrictive gun laws in the country.

Kiln
January 17, 2013, 02:21 AM
Law enforcement officers are just people like us. Most of them feel very strongly about the subject as well. The only law enforcement groups I could see supporting an AWB are ones in liberal stronghold states who genuinely believe that firearms are the problem and not gangs/criminals in general.

You'd have to be braindead to try and confiscate firearms from somebody unless absolutely necessary. I'm sure that Sheriffs don't want to put their men in danger over a bunch of political bullcrap.

blarby
January 17, 2013, 02:51 PM
From Lane county this morning :

Lane County Sheriff’s Office
Thomas M. Turner, Sheriff
January 17, 2013
To Lane County Residents:
The Sandy Hook shooting has prompted many recent discussions regarding gun control in the United States. Our own state of Oregon suffered a shooting at Clackamas Town Center in the Portland area last December and many of us remember with great clarity the murder of Officer Chris Kilcullen in April of 2011, and the Thurston High School shooting that occurred over a decade ago, killing four and injuring more than 20.
In response to Lane County residents’ many inquiries, I wanted to provide you with my stance on the issue.
As the Sheriff of Lane County, I have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the laws of the State of Oregon. I have upheld that oath for 31 years as a law enforcement officer in our community. While I understand the sense of urgency on behalf of citizens, I believe that any reaction, decision or response to issues that impact the rights of all people should be done so without haste and after careful consideration. Ultimately it is the Supreme Court, not any individual, that determines the constitutionality of any law.
As a member of the law enforcement community, I am supportive of our lawmakers evaluating the recent tragedies and engaging in discussions on how we can avoid the loss of more lives in the future. It would be irresponsible if we didn’t consider ways in which to make our Country safer. As law enforcement providers, we are tasked with conserving the peace and ensuring preservation of life.
As the details of the President's proposal emerge over the coming days, there will be many discussions on whether improvements can be made to increase public safety while upholding the Constitution and following the laws of our Country.
I remain committed to the preservation of the law, to the protection of life, and to you as residents of Lane County. We will continue to work together as a country, and as a county, to make our home a safer place to live.
Our primary focus here in Lane County needs to be on strengthening our failing public safety system. We must continue to work together to make Lane County a safer place to live. As your Sheriff, I ask for your support.
Sincerely,
Thomas M.


Not exactly what we were looking for.............


My response :

Thank you for providing the response.

Given the fragile and failing nature of our public safety system in Lane county, I am elated to receive a response which fully illustrates our Sheriffs commitment to his citizens' ability to defend both their families and property with firearms of their own choosing in accordance with the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution.

I appreciate his timely response in this matter.

colorado_handgunner
January 18, 2013, 07:41 PM
I applaud sheriff Mueller’s brave stance, regarding his decision to have his deputies enforce or not enforce any pending legislation. I do have two problems with his decision; Sheriff Mueller took an oath to uphold the law, not just the laws he approves of. Second sheriff Mueller may be in for quite an unpleasant surprise if he actively attempts to stop or obstruct any Federal law enforcement officer who is acting under color of law.

Please folks try and remember the last 4 + weeks have been some of the most trying and disturbing times I can remember in years. I read and heard normal and sane people say some of the most outlandish things. If there is one time we have to take the “high road” and present ourselves as calm cool sane and rational adults this is it.

Took an oath to uphold the constitution. Big difference.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

Hedgemeister
January 18, 2013, 09:29 PM
Agreed. Awesome! Someone started a Facebook page as well!

76shuvlinoff
January 18, 2013, 10:20 PM
I am glad to read about some class acts out there.

Tonight I read about one of our long time county deputies getting arrested for stealing painkillers at the jailhouse.

St Joseph Co. Michigan.

Is it really that hot in Texas?

jamesbeat
January 19, 2013, 12:19 AM
I've got a lump in my throat from reading this thread.
Seems like there are still some good folks out there that recognize that they are public servants and actually care about it too.

I hope this helps to drive the message home.

Brno
January 19, 2013, 12:50 AM
Our Sheriff here in Larimer County (northeastern Colorado) also issued a similar statement swearing to uphold the Constitution and refusing to enforce any federal laws that conflict with his sworn duty/responsibilities, etc. etc.

I wonder if these guys (County Sheriffs) are consulting with each other across the country regarding this matter? The wording of their letters to the President and press are remarkably similar.

Regardless, I sure appreciate their willingness to speak their minds. Thank God for honorable men in high places.

jamesbeat
January 19, 2013, 01:14 AM
A rare breed indeed nowadays.

Some of these letters read as though Abe Lincoln wrote them.

wannabeagunsmith
January 19, 2013, 01:19 AM
here in spokane wa our sheriff said he dosent want any new laws but our police chiefon the other hand (a nyc native) wants a full awb and gun regestration....we are a city devided.

velojym
January 19, 2013, 01:24 AM
Sheriffs are usually elected, and Chiefs are normally political appointees. No big surprise there.

Quiet
January 19, 2013, 07:20 AM
From CA...
http://i.imgur.com/Yrs3opN.png?1?1096

sansone
January 19, 2013, 07:41 AM
sold a deputy an SKS yesterday and without my asking he said the sheriff instructed them all to ignore ANY new firearm restrictions that come to light..
made me smile ear-to-ear

If you enjoyed reading about "Linn County Sheriff Sends letter to Biden - No intent to enforce" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!