Here's an interesting shot.


PDA






BBQJOE
February 2, 2013, 08:43 PM
S&W .44mag, 8-3/8ths.
This is an internet friend of mine from England who was just dying to shoot the biggest gun I have, so of course I had to oblige. It was cold and raining that day, hence the gloves.

We were trying to emulate a shot my wife took sometime ago, capturing the gasses escaping the barrel.
This is as close as we got that day. As an after thought I could have probably put the camera in video mode and clipped the pic we were after.


All that aside, you can see that ignition has taken place, and the bullet is still probably meandering its way down the barrel.

The curious thing about this shot is where the hammer is.
The position would tell me that the hammer does not remain seated throughout the entire performance as I would have thought.

If you enjoyed reading about "Here's an interesting shot." here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Fleetman
February 2, 2013, 08:52 PM
Nice.....very difficult to capture a shot like that manually releasing the shutter. I'm sure your friend loved the .44 Mag....very unlikely she would ever get that chance back home....good job on you!

My wife captured our .50BMG at the moment of firing but the picture is not on this phone. Pretty impressive gas flow from the brake and my hair is in mid-recoil...lol

BBQJOE
February 2, 2013, 08:57 PM
I found it! This is the shot we were trying to recreate.
My wife got this one with a single click of a shutter.
(Posted this before)

Fleetman
February 2, 2013, 09:00 PM
Outstanding!

rcmodel
February 2, 2013, 09:03 PM
The position would tell me that the hammer does not remain seated throughout the entire performance as I would have thought. Primer set-back in the case, and internal pressure in the primer pocket of the case partially re-cocks the hammer as seen in your photo.

Many folks do no believe this can happen.

But old Colt Single-actions shooting low pressure ..45 Colt loads can re-cock themselves and rotate the cylinder if the firing pin bushing is missing in the recoil shield.

There was an early machinegun that operated the whole gun off of primer set-back in the dawn of machinegun invention in the early 1900's.

Outstanding photo BTW!
She didn't even shut her eyes!!!!

And who here among us can say that when shooting a .44 Mag!! :D

rc

TennJed
February 2, 2013, 09:12 PM
Here is a couple of me shooting a 45 colt Blackhawk. The camera caught the fire but not the gun

http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6205/6078939644_918aee921b.jpg

http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6190/6048443574_67fc8db96d.jpg

M-Cameron
February 2, 2013, 09:18 PM
i think this is probably one of my favorite shots.....357 mag from a 2" SP101

http://i.imgur.com/dlGh8.jpg

herkyguy
February 3, 2013, 09:14 AM
This reminds me that I haven't shot my SP101 with a hot .357 load in a while. I used to giggle a bit at an indoor range watching the blast. A bit of a waste of usable gases, but still pretty interesting to see.

JRH6856
February 3, 2013, 12:27 PM
Anybody notice the grip the shooter is using in the first pic?

REPOMAN
February 4, 2013, 10:10 AM
Cool Pics Guys......Thanks for sharing :)

dbp
February 4, 2013, 10:52 AM
Here is a couple of me shooting a 45 colt Blackhawk. The camera caught the fire but not the gun

http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6205/6078939644_918aee921b.jpg

http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6190/6048443574_67fc8db96d.jpg
OK -- I'll bite. Where the crap is the gun? What type of photo physics is at work here?

Fleetman
February 4, 2013, 01:45 PM
Here's the .50BMG I mentioned....not a handgun and not nearly as dramatic but a good shot nonetheless......

One of favorite "burners" is a 2" Taurus .22WRM but no pics of it.....yet

BCRider
February 4, 2013, 02:08 PM
Photography is one of my far too many hobbies.

Shots of the fireball are all a case of luck over skill. It's like trying to take a picture of someone popping off a camera flash at you.

One way to get around that is to set up the camera for a longer exposure time for the lighting conditions. That means a smaller aperature and longer exposure then go for a "fill flash" but without the flash on the camera. Instead the fireball becomes the flash.

On a compact camera use the "forced no flash" option. Then try it with a "fill flash" option. The "fill flash" is a setting that holds the lens open long enough to capture distant lighting conditions and make them look more or less like daylight while allowing the flash to brighten up the subject close in instead of leaving them looking like a sihouette of darkness. Such a setting SHOULD capture the shooter and gun nicely to freeze them and remain open long enough to capture the fireball.

The long exposure times will, unfortunetly, tend to blur the fireball. Things like M Cameron's donut of fire would not be possible as the donut is moving and would blur out. Such dramatic shots will remain a matter of luck and lots of attempts.

In all these cases a tripod or steadying the camera against something is wise to avoid blur.

At dusk or indoors it's not hard to set up the camera for a long exposure. With a quarter to half second exposure time and a little coordination between the shooter and camera operator it should only take a few tries to capture a good fireball picture.

Spend a little time with your camera's instruction manual if required and try it. We'll likely find ourselves knee deep in great fireball photos.... :D

TennJed
February 4, 2013, 05:30 PM
OK -- I'll bite. Where the crap is the gun? What type of photo physics is at work here?
I have wondered the same thing. I am not a photo guy so it is above my head. My wife was trying out a new camera and had it on a setting where you hold the button down and it takes multiple shots. (a setting used for sports shots I believe.) The gun was in my hand, but why the camera did not pick it up I have no idea

benEzra
February 5, 2013, 12:01 AM
OK -- I'll bite. Where the crap is the gun? What type of photo physics is at work here?
Remember that the shutter is open for quite a few milliseconds, so things in motion get blurred. The gun is dark colored and in motion (rotating upward and recoiling) so it is blurred out. The hands and arms are pretty stationary and are brighter so they imaged fine. The flash was imaged because of its brightness.

Unless that's the new Active-Camo Super-Concealed Carry edition...

340PD
February 5, 2013, 09:18 AM
I did, and and wondered how that was not caught by the OP before firing the gun.

Jim Watson
February 5, 2013, 01:10 PM
In the OP, I wonder if the blurred hammer is kickback or just shutter blur like the invisible Ruger farther down. Any road, S&W had to work on some of their monster magnums which doubled from that bounce. Hard to imagine, but it was a warranty item for a while. I bet it hurt, too.

There have been several automatics running on primer setback.
There was one that used special ammunition with a thick head and very deep primer pocket. The primer cup acted as a piston with a fairly long stroke.

But John C. Garand's first rifle was primer actuated with WWI GI .30-06. It was obsoleted by changes in the ammo. I always thought it was the shift from the old hot Pyro DG powder to more progressive MR and IMR types that did not kick the primer back as sharply. I have also read that it was ineffective with crimped primers when that became routine, but I have seen enough blown primers to think that would not hinder it.

By the way, that rifle had a box magazine. Don't blame Mr Garand for the enbloc clip, that was Pedersen's doing. The brass apparently liked it as a way to reduce ammo wastage by those newfangled automatics.

beag_nut
February 5, 2013, 04:53 PM
Here's my favorite:
http://http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/23/Bullet_coming_from_S%26W.jpg
It's from Wikipedia, in their article about S&W.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/23/Bullet_coming_from_S%26W.jpg

Outlaw Man
February 5, 2013, 06:11 PM
Cool pics!

A friend of mine and I set up my camera one day and tried to get some shots like that. We never got a good muzzle flash shot, but I did get one of my friend flinching slightly. So it wasn't a complete waste.

iLikeOldgunsIlikeNewGuns
February 5, 2013, 08:01 PM
Good Thread BBQ, glad you helped your friend have a great experience!

Taking "muzzle flash" shots has been a hobby of mine for somewhere around five years now. I've slowly been increasing the quality of my pics over that time. I'd bet my dollar that your hammer wasn't 'blown back' by the primer in your pic, and that it's more a matter of light and the way a camera takes in bright light vs a lack there of, as well as when exactly the shutter is open and closed vs the timing of the trigger-pull/hammer-drop/shot itself. I have dozens upon dozens of pics like these, and the hammer blur is very common in mine. Also very often, the hammer hasn't even seemed to move yet somehow, and yet there is the muzzle-flash present in the photo, such as in these two examples.

S&W 629-2 'Mountain Revolver' .44mag
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8426/7637672746_6c7cd69918_c.jpg

J.P. Sauer/Hawes SAA Peacemaker Clone in .45 Colt
http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6092/6313507272_c89c652e2a_z.jpg

I believe that the the great intensity of the flash leaves quite an 'imprint' on the photo when captured while the shutter is open, and the hammer doesn't reflect nearly as much light especially when in motion, so unless timing is incredibly precise as in shutter starts just before hammer hits primer, the hammer either disappears or blurs, or if the flash is towards the end of the exposure than it will appear as if still cocked/in rear postition because it was in that position for most of the shutter's duration. Seems so wordy when I try to write it, if we were talking face to face I could communicate this better

jmace57
February 5, 2013, 11:02 PM
Dang TennJedd - you look like you should be a character in Mortal Kombat! throwing fireballs.

ArchAngelCD
February 6, 2013, 12:19 AM
Remember that the shutter is open for quite a few milliseconds, so things in motion get blurred. The gun is dark colored and in motion (rotating upward and recoiling) so it is blurred out. The hands and arms are pretty stationary and are brighter so they imaged fine. The flash was imaged because of its brightness.

Unless that's the new Active-Camo Super-Concealed Carry edition...
I would buy that explanation but how do you explain the gun going transparent? Look again, you can see the foliage behind where the gun is supposed to be! How does an open shutter or a gun moving up turn that gun transparent?

benEzra
February 6, 2013, 08:10 AM
I would buy that explanation but how do you explain the gun going transparent? Look again, you can see the foliage behind where the gun is supposed to be! How does an open shutter or a gun moving up turn that gun transparent?
The same way a picket fence with wide gaps seems to become transparent when you drive by it fast; when the background is unobstructed by the moving item, you see it.

If the gun moves a foot while the shutter is open, then any given part of the background behind the gun is going to be visible, both before the gun gets there and after it passes by. If the gun blocks a particular part of the image for 1/10th of the time the shutter is open, the light the camera catches from that portion of the image is going to be 9/10th background and 1/10th gun. So the gun in the pic looks like a foot-long smear with the background showing through.

Mainsail
February 6, 2013, 09:30 AM
Fortuitous shot of the kid shooting the Alaskan:

http://img.geocaching.com/cache/log/large/85767052-0f3a-4696-a5da-e7e32d609302.jpg

BCRider
February 6, 2013, 01:04 PM
How does an open shutter or a gun moving up turn that gun transparent?

You have to understand how film or image sensors work. They see light, not dark. Light registers on the sensor while a lack of light does not. The final picture shows this lack of light as a dark area.

Now that sounds simple but the idea is that a light object will register where a dark one won't. So with a longer shutter time the brightly lit leaves in the background above the gun paint the image sensor first. Then the gun recoils and moves up. The dark gun does not erase the image of the brightly lit leaves when it blocks the light. Instead it simply stops any further exposure of that portion of the image. Meanwhile the gun moving up and out of the way lets the leaves that were originally hidden by the dark coloured gun to register on the image sensor.

So what you get is that the gun appears to be invisible.

Now if the gun were a polished stainless and there was a lot of light on it then what you'd see would be a bright pizza wedge like fan of white as the bright light from the gun itself paints over the area on the image sensor.

Another example of how this works is to set up a camera in a dark room and then click it open with a long exposure time. Now shine a weak flashlight or laser spotter on the wall and move it around like you're doodling with a pen. The final picture won't show a spot, it'll show the whole doodle pattern of the light moving. It doesn't just remember the last location as the shutter closes and show a single spot.

Dnaltrop
February 6, 2013, 02:01 PM
Friend got this with his Iphone completely at random.

If I look kind of "twisted" position wise, understand that due to pins in one shoulder, I have to bend/lean my torso to be able to get both hands up

9.9 grains Universal under a 250 grain hard cast, Ruger Blackhawk .45 Colt. Recoil from that load puts the barrel up past 45/50 degrees

And as well explained above, you can just see the ghost of my barrel starting to recoil as the exposure ends.

Phone cameras are getting better, but sometimes I miss the hours immersed in photographic chemical baths and the joy of long exposures in dim settings.

I don't miss the cost though.

iLikeOldgunsIlikeNewGuns
February 6, 2013, 10:25 PM
Great pics guys! As a muzzle-flash photo enthusiast, I am thoroughly enjoying them :D

BCRider
February 7, 2013, 02:12 PM
Dnaltrop, I never did get around to setting up a darkroom for doing B&W before the whole digital thing matured. So I never had the joy of souping film and paper.

Sadly cell phone cameras seem to be the accepted norm these days just as back then Kodak Instamatics were considered by many as having a "real" camera....:banghead:

You likely understand the far greater flexibility and abilities of the nicer cameras if you did dark room stuff. The good news is that we don't need to jump from cell phone cameras all the way up to a DSLR to get better control. There's a number of the neatly flat and pocketable P&S's that have shutter priority and aperature priority as options. And those along with exposure compensation let's you trick the camera into doing whatever you wish.

And if that's not enough there's a few flat P&S options that come with a full manual mode.

So just say "Push over baby" to the poor cell phone camera... :D

MrBorland
February 7, 2013, 02:22 PM
Great pics guys! As a muzzle-flash photo enthusiast, I am thoroughly enjoying them

Here's another, then. Not so much flash, but it catches what appears to be the bullet just leaving the muzzle.

http://i415.photobucket.com/albums/pp239/becke016/GunsTargets/IDPAindoorNats2012-1.jpg

Dnaltrop
February 7, 2013, 02:28 PM
I'd really like to see manufacturers make a larger, high quality digital camera, that happens to have a decent cell phone built into it... SLR sized body with a good lens mount, able to attach to a tripod without extras. Remote trigger ( bluetooth) so we can get into our own shots.

I'm sure we'll get one eventually, guess I'll have to find another pistol while we wait.

iLikeOldgunsIlikeNewGuns
February 8, 2013, 03:51 AM
A friend of mine took this one of me years back in my young 20s (I developed much better shooting posture not long after) . Taken with a 'real camera,' the bullet is actually visible in the flash. I have two monitors, and only one of them shows it for some reason, so you may or may not be able to see it depending on what kind of screen you have, but it's there! :)

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3609/3444553320_042d3f5322_o.jpg

If you enjoyed reading about "Here's an interesting shot." here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!