Another Poll!!!- Liability Insurance


PDA






19-3Ben
February 6, 2013, 06:43 PM
This one is posted by the Hartford Courant and asks if gun owners should be forced to have liability insurance.

Please go vote. (http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/todaysbuzz/hc-should-gun-owners-be-required-to-buy-insurance-20130204,0,2084700.story)

There are actually two options for yes, and two for no. So think about which one you want. I voted no #2 since i believe that it would in effect allow insurance companies the power to regulate our right to own firearms.

If you enjoyed reading about "Another Poll!!!- Liability Insurance" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
glove
February 6, 2013, 08:08 PM
Done deal :)

Leanwolf
February 6, 2013, 08:34 PM
I voted.

L.W.

longknife12
February 6, 2013, 08:37 PM
done
dan

USAF_Vet
February 6, 2013, 08:41 PM
Done. So far the No votes are winning. Voted #1 no since I'm sick of the car/gun analogy.

matrem
February 6, 2013, 09:00 PM
I'd debate liability if and when those first amendment abusers admit the first is currently far more responsible for mayhem than the second.

JVaughn
February 6, 2013, 11:50 PM
I voted. About 64% total between the no's.

gbran
February 6, 2013, 11:54 PM
California lawmakers introduced a bill Tuesday to force gun owners to buy insurance.

black_powder_Rob
February 6, 2013, 11:59 PM
That is the most retarded thing ever. Insured gun owners, seems like a great wy for insurance companies to make money is all.

black_powder_Rob
February 7, 2013, 12:01 AM
Gbran I hate to say I but it might be time to leve california. I ate saying things like this but there comes a time when enough is enough.

pty101
February 7, 2013, 01:11 AM
done

Alaska444
February 7, 2013, 01:22 AM
Done.

Twiki357
February 7, 2013, 03:01 AM
How about liability insurance for the truth and accuracy by those exercising their first amendment rights?

Finally voted in the pole after 6 attempts at entering those stupid letters.

bannockburn
February 7, 2013, 07:16 AM
Requiring insurance is just another back-door approach to gun control.

Deus Machina
February 7, 2013, 07:30 AM
Voted.
Wanna bet that the insurance companies are going to push for this, knowing there's a 1-in-10,000 chance they ever have to pay out?

I'm unhappy that they add in a 'most victims of gun violence are suicides' BS line because, really, most causes of crime with a gun are actually criminals anyway.

481
February 7, 2013, 12:41 PM
Done.

Ranger Roberts
February 7, 2013, 12:46 PM
Done. The "no's" have it by a pretty safe margin right now

Ryanxia
February 7, 2013, 01:16 PM
I voted for the second option No as well.

2zulu1
February 7, 2013, 01:41 PM
Voted.

Let me give you some insights into government mandated insurance programs. Using FEMA as an example, I live in the desert and there have been 100 year and 500 year flood events in the area. Anyone with a basic knowledge of reading topographical maps can see that my property is elevated compared to properties over a mile away, that also have not flooded. However, even though there has never been an insurance claim on the property, and even though FEMA states that I may or may not live on a flood plain, FEMA mandates I purchase homeowner's flood insurance through a private insurance carrier.

But to be fair, all insurance carriers are bound to abide by the same criteria and therefore will charge the same premium, in theory. I also have a flood certificate, based upon a survey conducted by a civil engineering company, that my home is NOT located on a flood plain.

But, FEMA mandates I purchase flood insurance for my home because I may or may not live on a flood plain.

Now to the level playing field that insurance companies charge the same premiums. One company, Allstate, stated that if the flood certificate was applied for insurance coverage, my premium would cost more. Without using the flood certificate my premium would be reduced to over $1000/year. Another provider quoted a premium in excess of $1850/year. These are older quotes and their premiums have increased since then.

I finally located an insurance provider who charges less than $400/year and they talk to you like a human being.

The kicker to all of this, seems like FEMA found some additional flood plains in the desert around Katrina time.

I've sat down and had genuine talks with local insurance providers and hundreds and hundreds of other home owners are experiencing the same issues as me.

Mandating gun owner's insurance and we'll experience worse case scenarios than the currently abused (corrupt?) flood insurance programs. If you think FEMA is a nightmare, it's only a prelude to what we all will experience with a mandated gun owner's insurance program.

trauma
February 7, 2013, 01:45 PM
done

leprechaun50
February 7, 2013, 03:26 PM
FYI
I voted on this website yesterday. Went back to it today and was able to vote again.

If you enjoyed reading about "Another Poll!!!- Liability Insurance" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!