lowest rings possible?


PDA






greyling22
July 27, 2013, 01:56 PM
I am looking for the lowest weaver rings. Doesn't have to be the VERY lowest, but low. I have these leupold rifleman vertical split rings that midway calls .326 rings height, http://www.midwayusa.com/product/752178/leupold-1-rifleman-vertical-split-rings-weaver-style-medium-matte so I bought some burris zee low rings midway calls .130 rings height. http://www.midwayusa.com/product/701259/burris-1-zee-weaver-style-rings-matte-lowThey show up and are the exact same height. grrrrr. $25 wasted. I guess they are measuring different places. I wish that had been clearer. Anyway, I need lower rings. Anything lower out there?

I have a short mag scope I am trying to place on a marlin 336 so rings placement is both odd and specific. I am stuck with using a picatinny rail so any DNZ or talley mounting systems will not work. Has to be weaver rings.

If you enjoyed reading about "lowest rings possible?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Haxby
July 27, 2013, 02:49 PM
Leupold rifleman horizontal split lows are low.
Old fashioned Weaver lows are low.
I don't know if either is appreciably lower than what you have now.

If you enjoyed reading about "lowest rings possible?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!