Brainwashed by the Movies


PDA






ZVP
July 8, 2014, 02:02 PM
I like many others are brainwashed into loving the looks of a 4 5/8" BL on a S/a Old Western styled revolver!
I blame the Movies because most old Colts had the long barrels for making power and having a good sight radius. The movies and "Fast Draws" made us think the other way.
Besides, the revolvers DO look good like that! Even Remingtons and the old BP C&B revolvers take on a new life with short barrels!

I bought my Stainless Vaquero in 4 5/8" because I wanted the smaller, easier to hide/Holster revolver. It handles GREAT too! If I bought a .45 Vaquero, it'd be a 7 1/2" just for nostalgias sake plus sights and max power.
The Colt and S&W DA revolvers in4" were common on Police belts nd to most buyers so naturally we went for the shorter S/A, it was a "familiar"...
Good or bad thing, it's a fact and I am pretty sure things won't change so ammo makers need to make ammo around this barrel length for preformance's sake.
We got influenced pretty easily but it wasn't necessarily a bad thing as a great many shooters choose one!
Kinda like that "Gangster" pointing a gun sideways, How DUMB!
JMHO,
ZVP

If you enjoyed reading about "Brainwashed by the Movies" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
bannockburn
July 8, 2014, 03:47 PM
ZVP

I don't know for sure but the western movies and TV series of my misspent youth notwithstanding, I just have always liked the looks of the 4 5/8" barrel on a SAA. To me it makes the whole gun appear well balanced and aesthetically pleasing to the eye. Which is strange in relation to my collection of single action revolvers in that most of my more traditional single actions (Ruger Vaquero, Ruger Single Six, and Beretta Stampede) sport 5 1/2" barrels, while my less traditional single actions (Ruger Blackhawks), have my preferred 4 5/8" set-up.

I think to me it's all great and I enjoy all of my single action revolvers no matter what their barrel length is.

Driftwood Johnson
July 8, 2014, 10:08 PM
Howdy

The most popular barrel length for the SAA by sales was the 5 1/2" barrel. That is what I see most often in the old Westerns. Frankly, I think a 5 1/2" barrel looks boring. I do have a soft spot for the 4 3/4" length though (Ruger makes it 4 5/8). This 2nd Gen was made in 1968.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v495/Driftwood_Johnson/colts/colts_05.jpg


This Bisley was made in 1906 or 1909, I forget exactly when right now.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v495/Driftwood_Johnson/colts/Bisley%20Colt%203840/bisley04_zps9adefab5.jpg

Lucky Derby
July 9, 2014, 04:26 AM
Those are some nice Colts Driftwood.

critter
July 9, 2014, 07:08 AM
WOW! I have an exact twin to your Bisley-same barrel length, same 'finish', etc. Mine is lettered and shipped in 1907-caliber 32-20.

jmr40
July 9, 2014, 01:28 PM
Not really an area where I'm knowledgeable, but it is my understanding that the Army wanted the longer 7 1/2 barrel for cavalry use. It was intended as their primary weapon and the longer barrel was fine on horseback. They used it at some pretty long ranges as I understand and why they wanted the long barrel.

The shorter barrels seems more popular with civilian use.

If I'm wrong wouldn't mind someone correcting me.

jimbo555
July 9, 2014, 03:29 PM
Matt Dillon on Gunsmoke preferred the 7 1/2" barrel! :D

Arkansas Paul
July 9, 2014, 04:00 PM
Frankly, I think a 5 1/2" barrel looks boring.

I agree. I like the 4 3/4" myself. There's just something about the barrel that ends at the ejector rod housing that looks perfect to me.

And seriously, what does 3/4" extra really do in real world terms?

Ed Ames
July 9, 2014, 04:57 PM
I can't blame tv or movies since I was born after most of that went off the air/died as a movie genre. But I do generally like the shorter barrels on single actions.

I actually have a nuanced preference. I think the shorter the distance between trigger and top, the longer the barrel should be to look good.

In other words, a gun with no top strap (e.g. 1860 c&b), or with a compact frame (many of the American top breaks), looks great with a longer barrel but seeme odd when shortened. A taller gun (1873, blackhawk, etc) looks unbalanced and odd with the long barrel, but looks great with 3-?/? to 4-?/? barrel.

People are strange...

Sunray
July 9, 2014, 05:02 PM
More firearms are sold because a guy saw it in a movie than you can shake a stick at. I have an M1 Rifle and Carbine because of 'Combat'. And desperately need a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros because of Roy Rogers. Saw 'em at a Canadian shop last year. $2500 Cdn. Need both kidneys. snicker.
It's not brainwashing. It's training.
"...intended as their primary weapon..." No cavalryman would ever consider a revolver as his primary weapon. That'd be his sabre. Geez.
"...This Bisley was..." Made for target shooting. That was the idea behind 'em.

SlamFire1
July 9, 2014, 05:04 PM
I preferred 5 1/2", and when given a choice, that is what I bought.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v479/SlamFire/Pistols%20various/DSCN0472.jpg (http://smg.photobucket.com/user/SlamFire/media/Pistols%20various/DSCN0472.jpg.html)

pendennis
July 9, 2014, 08:35 PM
The SAA, with a 5.5" barrel was referred to as the "Artillery Model". It was usually issued to infantry and artillery members who needed side arms.

dogtown tom
July 9, 2014, 10:52 PM
Sunray .... I have an M1 Rifle and Carbine because of 'Combat'. ...
The only machine gun I've ever really wanted was the Thompson that Vic
Morrow carried.

Malamute
July 10, 2014, 01:00 AM
Many of us are likely swayed by things we've seen and liked. I tend to gravitate towards easy to carry. I've had various longer barreled SA revolvers, but they've ended up being traded off or cut down to 4 5/8". I had a 5 1/2" cut also, as I had plenty of good leather for that size, and none for 5 1/2" guns. The 4 5/8" guns are about perfect for all day carry and not getting in the way, or pushing up on chairs or vehicle seats or the ground when sitting. Same with 4" DA guns. The longer ones are a little nicer for shooting, but for carry, the shorter ones mentioned are my favorites.


http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/Malamute/outdoor%20sports/IMG_5854_zps61c2ca05.jpg

sigsmoker
July 10, 2014, 01:50 AM
I like cowboy movies and even if they are historically incorrect, I think the firearms in them are pretty neat. The real cowboys and outlaws and lawmen would have loved to own and use the guns we see on TV.

Driftwood Johnson
July 10, 2014, 10:05 PM
Howdy Again

The original barrel length of the Colt SAA was 7 1/2". We can talk about sight radius and long range shooting and all that, but personally I have always felt that the long barrel was a holdover from percussion days. With a C&B revolver you needed a loading lever long enough to get enough leverage to shove a ball into the chambers. You needed enough leverage to deform the ball as it went into the chamber mouth. Most large frame C&B revolvers had barrels 7 or 8 inches long just so a reasonably long loading lever could be housed underneath. When cartridge revolvers came along, it was natural to make them with long barrels too, since that is what Colt and Remington were used to making. My take on it anyway.

The original 7 1/2" Colts had gotten pretty worn by the 1890s, so most were sent back to Colt or Army armorers to be refreshed. Many of the barrels were cut down to 5 1/2" at that time. That is the origin of the 5 1/2" barrel. Many were issued to artillery units, hence the name Artillery Model. This is a collector's term only, there never was an Artillery Model listed in the Colt catalog.

I agree. I like the 4 3/4" myself. There's just something about the barrel that ends at the ejector rod housing that looks perfect to me.

And seriously, what does 3/4" extra really do in real world terms?

The 4 3/4" barrel was the shortest standard length barrel with Colt because that is the length of the ejector housing. The ejector housing and its associated parts were the same with all three standard barrel lengths; 7 1/2", 5 1/2", 4 3/4". A shorter barrel than 4 3/4" would require a different ejector rod assembly. Notice that the really short Storekeeper's Models usually do not have an ejector.

DammitBoy
July 10, 2014, 10:21 PM
Thys why I always liked Clint Eastwood movies, more realism with firearms.

http://movies11reviews.blogforcash.biz/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/2659781.jpg

MartinS
July 11, 2014, 11:59 AM
"And seriously, what does 3/4" extra really do in real world terms? "

Shooting looking OVER the sights and gun the extra 3/4 inch seems to give a better sense of just where the barrel is pointing. And sight radius...more, muzzle rise...less.

shep854
July 11, 2014, 11:20 PM
"Matt Dillon on Gunsmoke preferred the 7 1/2" barrel!"--jimbo555
At 6'7" he could make it work! ;)

jmace57
July 11, 2014, 11:27 PM
I don't know about y'all, but we didn't watch "Gunsmoke"...we watched "Marshall Dillon" when I was a kid! :)

Kaeto
July 12, 2014, 05:09 AM
Paladin also carried a colt with a 7 1/2" barrel.

http://www.tvacres.com/images/west2_have_gun_will_travel_holster2.jpg

skypilot1941
July 13, 2014, 12:31 AM
I remember spending the night at my grandparents house in the late '50's and watching "Have Gun Will Travel at 8:30, then Marshall Dillon at 9. Grandma did not like Paladin pointing his revolver at us! LOL

shep854
July 13, 2014, 12:57 AM
One of my dad's iron-clad rules was that WE WATCHED WESTERNS!!

BHP FAN
July 13, 2014, 04:08 AM
http://i989.photobucket.com/albums/af11/hut-man/pistols.jpg (http://s989.photobucket.com/user/hut-man/media/pistols.jpg.html)

BaltimoreBoy
July 13, 2014, 09:26 PM
Movies? TV?
Well maybe.
I think I was more brainwashed by my Fanner 50's.
http://www.guns.com/2011/08/19/the-many-faces-of-the-fanner-50-americas-most-collectible-toy-cap-gun/

skypilot1941
July 14, 2014, 01:06 AM
Yeap. Had my Fanner 50. Also had the Paladin set with the derringer in the belt buckle. Get this. At the elementary school which I attended in those days, we could bring one toy with us when we got back to school after the Christmas holiday. Guess what all the guys brought? Just about every one of them wearing their Fanner 50's or Paladin set. Imagine that happening today.

thriller
July 14, 2014, 03:00 PM
I bought a new vaquero in .357 mag this year. I always prefered the look of the 4 5/8", but when I held and pointed that and the 5 1/2", I ended up taking the 5 1/2" one home with me. Funny, because if I had not handeled both at the same time, Im sure Id have bought the 4 1/2"

Jaymo
July 14, 2014, 11:19 PM
I prefer the look of the 5.5", though I also have a 4.62 and 4.75"

mdauben
July 15, 2014, 11:44 PM
No doubt the 4 1/2 is handier and easier to carry but I prefer the looks of the 5 1/2 inch SAA.

ZVP
July 16, 2014, 02:48 AM
Some really nice Pix there!' Personally, I've always been drawn to shorter barrels just because I like the look of a shorter rvolver. Heck I even lke the "Storekeepers" versions though they were likely very hard to hit with as most Snubbies are today.
I have read of the barrels being worn out on the Military .45's and I wonder how soft the barrel steel was? Evidentlly complete rebuilds were cost effective for the military.
I'm sure the aversge Cowboy shot his revolver a lot less than did the average Calverymen did. Both in battle and during prtice, they used them a lot.
I am sure todays barrel steel is much better. and will last longer.
A good point of the shorter Leather neded ws brought up! I have cut a couple holsters down to fit shorter guns and it's no easy proposition! You must first roughthe cut out then do the final shapeing to make it look correct. I have come up with arounded cut, on a slight angle that seems to look pretty good for a Kitvhen Table job! You don't want the end of the barrel exposed nor do you want the leather to "fold" closed on an open holster bottom.
I got lucky the first cut nd found the right length by dumb luck.
Holster alteration is an real art believe me!
ZVP

Greg528iT
July 16, 2014, 10:32 AM
James Garner in the "Support your Local....." twin set of movies carries a 5.5" SAA and operates it quite effectively.

http://imgs.dvdempire.com/products/89/46689h.jpg
not today's trigger control, but hey.

Walter Brennan (sic) also had a 5.5" http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xoumRmh9cws/UEbG422R-GI/AAAAAAAADew/3HYrGURllBI/s1600/Support+Your+Local+Sheriff.jpg

http://www.avcesar.com/source/software/tmdb/6477/extrait_support-your-local-sheriff_3.jpg

Greg528iT
July 16, 2014, 10:41 AM
I'd think it safe to say, folks like Walter Brennan had is own SAAs for the movies.. and YES, holding the hammer with the web of your hand would make it impossible to fire, but I think Walter KNEW that, knew what position he and James Garner was in and was making dam sure even his empty gun was as safe as possible.

Jim Watson
July 16, 2014, 11:11 AM
When I tooled up for CAS, I traded an obscure automatic for a 7.5" .44 Special. That did well, but I wanted the cool civilian/gunfighter look, so I had a 4.75" put on, along with a .44 WCF cylinder so I could shoot the same ammo as my rifle. I shot that for about one season and then had the 7.5" put back on so I could HIT stuff. The longer sight radius really does make a difference. For me, at least.
When SASS went from three to four guns, I added a 7.5" .44 WCF clone.

If I were to resume CAS, I would probably shoot 5.5" .38 Specials. I already know the 4.75" sight radius is short and a smallbore 7.5" is so darned heavy.

Cooldill
July 16, 2014, 01:25 PM
Thys why I always liked Clint Eastwood movies, more realism with firearms.

http://movies11reviews.blogforcash.biz/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/2659781.jpg
Yes! Most other westerns would have Josey toting around a brace Colt SAA's or Remington 1875s even though the story takes place directly after the Civil War! I always dig it when I see percussion revolvers in movies during the Civil War or shortly before/after before cartridge guns were common.

If you enjoyed reading about "Brainwashed by the Movies" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!