tauras vs. s&w hammerless
rjk2475
February 11, 2003, 07:51 PM
please aquaint me with the pros and cons of these firearms for ccw.:confused:
If you enjoyed reading about "tauras vs. s&w hammerless" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
10-Ring
February 11, 2003, 08:11 PM
I've just had better luck w/ the consistency of the S&W. I like the 640...compact, reliable, very little to snag on anything, & easy to shoot.
The biggest inconsistency I've found w/ th Tauri has been in their triggers. Some can be really nice while others can be really gritty.
rjk2475
February 11, 2003, 08:14 PM
10-RING how do the 640 and 340 compare?
ChristopherG
February 11, 2003, 08:40 PM
I'm not 10-ring, but I've handled both and own the 340, and I can tell you how they compare: the 340 is a heck of a lot lighter. Ludicrous light. If you wanna carry a J-frame in your pocket, it's the clear choice.
Be forewarned, though, that it's never going to be as fun to spend 3 hours at the range with as the relatively leaden 640, and you will NOT want to shoot a lot of .357 out of it (a lot meaning any; if you shoot .357 to practice with a carry load, it will be an act of self discipline; if you like it, you are probably also into other pursuits best not discussed here).
So, depends on what you want. I wouldn't want it to be my only revolver, or even my only .357. It's such a fun and versatile caliber to shoot, I'm glad to have a 686+ that can handle a bunch of it and has a wonderful trigger and accuracy and whatnot. But that 340--man, it is a marvel of technology and a wonderful compromise between adequate power and easy front-pocket carry.
cg
EJ
February 11, 2003, 08:53 PM
Stay away from the Taurus--
Check these threads--
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=5407
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=7652
DeltaElite
February 11, 2003, 08:55 PM
Get the Smith, I carry a 640 in my pocket.
See, you thought I was just happy to see ya.:what:
Catbird
February 11, 2003, 09:01 PM
I'm not 10-Ring either, but I do have a S&W 640 and a S&W 340PD. I also have 3 Taurus snubbies (not hammerless), one each in .38Spl, .357 & .45 Colt. I will never buy another Taurus revolver.
By today's standards with the utilization of aluminum, titanium and scandium, I personally find my 640 a tad too heavy for comfortable front pants pocket carry. My 340PD is great except for the fact that I know I will NEVER fire full-power .357s in it. I have fired full-power .357s in my 640 and THAT wasn't a lot of fun.
fallingblock
February 12, 2003, 05:09 AM
They are a bit heavy for some folks to carry in their pockets, but I never had a problem in that respect.
And they are a LOT nicer for heavy loads than the helium-weights:D
Quantrill
February 12, 2003, 09:19 AM
Go for the Smith! Quantrill
Kahr carrier
February 12, 2003, 08:58 PM
S&W.:)
If you enjoyed reading about "tauras vs. s&w hammerless" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.