No mention of Feinstein's latest AWB bill on her website


June 14, 2004, 06:51 PM
despite having a section devoted to renewing the ban.

What does this mean?

If you enjoyed reading about "No mention of Feinstein's latest AWB bill on her website" here in archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join today for the full version!
Dave Markowitz
June 14, 2004, 07:50 PM
It's probably just an oversight. I'd hesitate to read too much into it.

Standing Wolf
June 14, 2004, 07:50 PM
It means she's ashamed.


June 15, 2004, 08:13 AM
Maybe it means she doesn't update her website very often.

Dain Bramage
June 15, 2004, 09:54 AM
It's hard to type with the cloven hooves.

June 15, 2004, 12:40 PM
It means she wants to try to slip it in under the radars. Expose the witch.

June 15, 2004, 02:04 PM
No mention of Feinstein's latest AWB bill on her website
despite having a section devoted to renewing the ban.

What does this mean?

Communists reserve to themselves the right to lie, cheat and steal.

June 15, 2004, 09:03 PM
There are various things it could mean, as has been suggested. It could mean that she hasn't updated her web sit since the bill's introduction. It could mean she's trying to hide it from the good guys. It could mean that it hasn't occurred to her to put it on her web site. It could mean her web geek had a minor cerebral hemorrhage and lost all memory of her request to put it up. It could mean that she's not too proud of it, and doesn't want to advertise something where she may fall flat on her face. It could mean that you're reading the cache of your proxy server, and it really is on her web site.

(There's a joke with the punch line, "Hey, four Jews, five opinions!" I guess we'll have to extend that to, "Hey, one Mormon, six opinions!" :) )

As Dave posted, I wouldn't read much into it. It could mean just about anything.

June 16, 2004, 12:59 AM
It's hard to type with the cloven hooves.

:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

June 16, 2004, 01:05 AM
It means she is up for reelection this year.:uhoh:

June 16, 2004, 10:44 AM
Fraid not, that would be our other cloven hoofed Senator, Barbara Boxer. You know, all the evil, none of the intelligence.

June 16, 2004, 11:53 AM
the link :barf:

and if your not from ********** from the website. :fire: :fire:

E-Mail the Senator

All electronic mail sent is tallied and your opinions are noted and appreciated. If you wish a response to your email, please include your California postal mailing address in the text of your message. Due to the volume of email we receive, we are only able to respond to messages that contain a California postal address. Please ensure that your email is in plain text format and does not include any attachments.


June 16, 2004, 03:49 PM
Here is my letter to my hated senator, sent to her website today.

As you have sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America, I expect you to uphold ALL of it.
Here is a copy of the Bill of Rights, to refresh your memory as you seem to have forgotten at least one of them since you are for banning a semi-automatic weapon that has been miss-named "Assault Weapon" and has many lawful uses in hunting and target practice.

Pay particular attention to the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America and ask yourself how you can ban something the founders of our country said we are free to possess.

As you read the 2nd Amendment take particular note of the last 4 words which read, "shall not be infringed" which an "assault weapons" ban does.

Bill of Rights
Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III

No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Amendment VII

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

If you enjoyed reading about "No mention of Feinstein's latest AWB bill on her website" here in archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join today for the full version!