New 'status symbol' In DC---Bodyguards


PDA

Waitone
February 15, 2003, 08:22 AM
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=31030

New 'status symbol'
in D.C.: Bodyguards
Even chief of federal personnel agency has her own round-the-clock protection

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: February 15, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern


By Paul Sperry
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

WASHINGTON – The era of terror has spawned a new "status symbol" in the nation's capital: bodyguards.

If you don't have them, you're not considered important, say career federal employees who find the post-Sept. 11 trend both amusing and disturbing.

Even the low-profile director of the relatively small, 3,600-employee Office of Personnel Management now has a protective detail.

Interior Secretary Gale Norton, moreover, is protected by a phalanx of guards armed with MP-5 submachine guns, a weapon used by the president's Secret Service detail.

"It's crazy," said a veteran U.S. official now involved in homeland security.

In the past, protective detail for Cabinet members was limited to overseas travel. And bodyguards were armed with merely handguns, such as the .357 Magnum or 9mm Sig-Sauer.

Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta's security detail also is heavily armed, which is ironic considering Mineta opposed arming pilots after the Sept. 11 hijackings.

Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge is expected to get a full Secret Service detail like the president.

Bush administration officials say the added personnel security is a response to recent threats from al-Qaida. They say assassinations and kidnappings of top U.S. officials are among planned attacks.

All federal agencies have back-up sites where top officials can go in the event of an attack on Washington, but that won't protect them if they are individually targeted by terrorists, Bush officials say.

But career officials say some agency heads, such as Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson, are reassigning armed criminal agents in their inspector general's offices to bodyguard duty in possible violation of the Inspector General Act of 1978.

"The IG act only authorized investigation and audit for fraud, waste and abuse, not dignitary protection," said one official. "Those agents have no legal authority to protect anyone."

Other agency heads, such as Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham and Commerce Secretary Don Evans, tap their bodyguards from their departments' offices of security.

FEMA Director Joe Allbaugh, meantime, has a detail of deputy U.S. Marshals, who also provide protection for the U.S. drug czar.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld uses agents from the Army Criminal Investigative Division, which raises questions about enlisted military personnel doing civilian law-enforcement duties in the protection of a civilian.

Career officials say the recent assignment of heavily armed bodyguards in many cases has more to do with image enhancement than protection.

"Having a protective detail is the new status symbol in town," an Interior Department official who requested anonymity said. "You don't look important unless you have one."

Said another official, who works for the new Homeland Security Department: "It is a fact that a detail is very prestigious now in Washington."


OPM Director Kay Coles James

Office of Personnel Management Director Kay Coles James recently was assigned a protective detail. "She is taken care of 24-7," said OPM spokesman Scott Hatch, who declined to elaborate.

Some homeland-security officials wonder if it's not overkill.

"I don't think the director of OPM is one of the leaders in Osama bin Laden's cross hairs," said one official who asked to go unnamed.

But Hatch pointed out that in the aftermath of a terrorist attack on the capital, it would fall to James to determine for the president the "operational status of government," based on an assessment of personnel who would be available to run the various agencies. She also would work closely with the head of the General Services Administration, which manages government buildings, he said.

Space cops

Some also worry that by going overboard on new security measures, top politicos may be unwittingly setting up a police state.

"We're going to have a huge police-state infrastructure, one we probably won't be able to get rid of even after al-Qaida," said the Interior official.

Officials cite, for example, a provision in the recently signed Homeland Security Act that gives broad new policing powers to inspectors general. IGs are appointed by the president.

Even the obscure National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, has started a wide-ranging security program.

The National Security Safeguards Program was implemented last May "to protect NOAA against espionage, sabotage and foreign or domestic terrorism, as well as threats by foreign powers, organizations or persons directed toward personnel, facilities, operations, or administratively controlled, export-controlled, national security classified or proprietary information," said Conrad Lautenbacher Jr., undersecretary of commerce for oceans and atmosphere, in a law-enforcement sensitive memo obtained by WorldNetDaily.

"Initially this program will focus on implementing a comprehensive Visit Request System, conducting threat awareness training, responding to suspicious incident reports, and reviewing and overseeing NOAA's security clearance program," Lautenbacher added in the May 28 memo.

The program included a proposal for so-called "space cops," armed with guns, to monitor private operation and use of the nation's satellites through NOAA's National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service office.

But the plan has since been abandoned, Commerce Department sources say.

If you enjoyed reading about "New 'status symbol' In DC---Bodyguards" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
El Tejon
February 15, 2003, 08:34 AM
Too bad we serfs may not protect ourselves in D.C., however it is a "peasant free zone.":rolleyes:

Waitone
February 15, 2003, 08:54 AM
I find the hypocracy breath-taking.

Imagine working in a place where your average Joe Sixpack is specifically prohibited from taking measures to protect himself; yet, he has a boss that has his own armed guards.

You just can't make this stuff up.

BigG
February 15, 2003, 09:31 AM
:scrutiny:

QKRTHNU
February 15, 2003, 12:21 PM
What makes these bodyguards so special that they can carry around MP5s? Aren't they classified pretty much the same as a rent-a-cop?

CleverNickname
February 15, 2003, 12:42 PM
QKRTHNU, they're Federal LEOs. No restrictions on what/where they can carry.

El Tejon
February 15, 2003, 12:54 PM
QK, a lot of them were rent-a-cops, but get paper when they raise their right hand and swear. Like Clinton's drug tsar.

CZ-75
February 15, 2003, 01:23 PM
Is this in addition to the armored limousines?

Azrael256
February 15, 2003, 02:24 PM
I was in DC in 1999 seeing the sights. I saw a man in ragged torn clothing, unshaven, and unwashed. It was fairly obvious that he was homeless. I walked over and spoke briefly with him, and after some discussion, I determined that he was mentally handicapped in some way, which probably prevented him from leading a normal life. I had a $5 bill in my pocket, and I figured that he needed it more than I did, so I gave it to him. He thanked me with tears in his eyes, and gave me a hug. I don't know if that $5 made any difference in his life, but it was worth a shot.

That man is the only person I met in that city that I consider to be worth my time, money, or energy.

echo3mike
February 15, 2003, 05:51 PM
I've met the guy you're talking about...he's long gone, caught the last train out and lives somewhere in Atlanta now...


There are stretches where I almost wish for an MCI in D.C....and the stretches are getting longer and longer. Other than the monuments and some of the animals at the zoo, there's nothing redeeming about the hole. When the cabbies who live and work on the sharp end can't defend themselves, but the high profile mover / shaker wannabe's have armed bodyguards (paid for by the cabbies), you really have to work at not being a cynic.



'Course, I gave in to the power of the Dark Side years ago...


S.

wQuay
February 15, 2003, 09:03 PM
"We're going to have a huge police-state infrastructure, one we probably won't be able to get rid of even after al-Qaida," said the Interior official.

WHOOPS! This guy needs to be a little less blunt.

Standing Wolf
February 15, 2003, 09:10 PM
The aristocrats both need and deserve to be protected from commoners, I'm sure.

4v50 Gary
February 15, 2003, 11:54 PM
If they really want to hurt me, they'd invite Brady, Bellesiles, Jennings, Rather and Moore for a holiday.

Waitone
February 16, 2003, 10:01 AM
Time published an article which gave a little more background on the skittishness of DC. The article is sobering and illustrative. Below I snipped one particularly interesting factoid. I would just love to know the names of the congressional types who attend the subject closed door meeting. A better example of the Golden Rule could not be found.


http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101030224-423465,00.html

<Big Snip>

Counterterrorism officials say they received a phone tip that unnamed members of Congress could be the targets of assassination attempts. On Wednesday, U.S. Capitol Police chief Terry Gainer warned House members to be on alert for attempts on their lives. At a closed-door briefing Thursday a group of Senators grilled Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge about whether they should clear their families out of the capital in anticipation of an attack. Ridge counseled them against it, but when pressed by the Senators for the odds of an attack on U.S. targets at home or abroad in the next several weeks, Ridge, according to one source familiar with the meeting, put the probability at "50% or greater." Ridge's spokesman denies that the Secretary gave that figure.

<Big Snip>

Redlg155
February 16, 2003, 10:31 AM
I'm sure there are some "Officials" out there dreading this decision to provide them with 24/7 bodyguard details.

What better way to spy on your own people? Who they meet, where they go, what they eat and any affairs are now a matter of record. Espionage protection at its finest. I'm sure there are some CIA operatives included with the details.

There should be some very nice personnel info files that come out of this one.

Good Shooting
RED

Blackhawk
February 16, 2003, 11:18 AM
Let's just deputize all the non-felon adult U.S. citizens there. They can all be bodyguards.... :rolleyes:

If you enjoyed reading about "New 'status symbol' In DC---Bodyguards" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!