An Oregon woman was told by a 911 dispatcher that authorities wouldn’t be able be able to help her as her ex-boyfriend broke into her place because of budget cuts.

“Uh, I don’t have anybody to send out there,” the 911 dispatcher told the woman. “You know, obviously, if he comes inside the residence and assaults you, can you ask him to go away?

The woman responded: “Yeah, it doesn’t matter, if he gets in the house I’m done.” Police say Bellah choked the woman and sexually assaulted her. He was arrested by Oregon State Police following the incident.

The sheriff’s department even put out a press release warning domestic violence victims to “consider relocating to an area with adequate law enforcement services.”

. Quinn, Emanuel lash out at Madigan gun bill Plan would void strict local firearms laws like city's assault weapons ban, foes say By Ray Long, Rick Pearson and Rafael Guerrero, Chicago Tribune reporters 8:35 p.m. CDT, May 23, 2013 "This legislation as written is a massive overreach that goes far beyond the conceal carry issue," said Quinn spokeswoman Brooke Anderson. "The measure would repeal Chicago's assault weapons ban and put public safety at risk. We oppose this." The Senate bill would require applicants to get separate endorsements — one for Chicago and one for the rest of the state — to carry a concealed weapon statewide. Those carve-outs are not in the House bill — a position the NRA has backed. .

“When dealing with anything to do with our Second Amendment, our lawmakers need to keep in mind that it serves to protect us as individuals... Incidences of violence with an assault weapon are few and far between, less than 1 percent,” Koenig said. “We shouldn’t give up our civil liberties for a false sense of safety.” Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...#ixzz2UArEtPAh

“When you look at what is happening with the IRS targeting certain groups, or the FBI looking into media phone records, you realize it doesn’t take a lot to push a government into tyranny. I’m not suggesting we are anywhere near that point now, but governments do break down,” Koenig cautioned. “Look at what happened after Hurricane Katrina, or the L.A riots. The government wasn’t there to protect the people, and Koreatown was left as something of a battleground. We see small incidences like this where the government does fail us.”

Attached Images

funeral.jpg (36.5 KB)

Attached Images

	SHOULDER HOLSTER.jpg (5.2 KB)
	SHOULDER HOLSTER2.jpg (2.9 KB)

Here’s the situation. There is no June 9th cliff. We don’t have enough votes willing to go over the cliff. We do have the latest bill submitted by Brandon Phelps. Put your drink down and take a deep breath. In fact, you might want to pour yourself about three fingers of your favorite beverage and get a good start on it before reading further. I’ll wait . . . You’re back. Good. Here’s where we are: The Speaker of the House has blessed this latest submission by Brandon Phelps for the People of the State of Illinois. HERE IT IS: AMENDMENT TO SB 2193. I haven’t even read it carefully yet, but from what I’ve seen it sucks. In fact, I believe I expressed an expletive or three upon scanning it. A $150 application fee – $300 for non-residents. Sixteen hours of training. Class B misdemeanors for prohibited locations first time. Goofy panels. An even LONGER list of prohibited locations. However . . . It also has across the board pre-emption on all local firearm regulations and restrictions. Chicago’s gun registration regime? Gone. Chicago’s ban on mags, lasers, etc.? Buh bye. Cook County’s black gun ban? History. Local “safe storage” ordinances? Into the dustbin of history. It also means we only need a simple majority to tweak it in coming years, not a 3/5ths majority.Why am I writing like I’m trying to sell you this fecal sandwich? Because the alternative, as one downstate Democrat described it to me, was a combination of the House Bill that Chicago introduced that got a whopping 31 votes and Kwame’s proposal in the Senate that hasn’t gotten any votes yet, but is may issue without any sort of pre-emption. In short, the Speaker offered this proposal that Brandon is offering as an effort to split the baby. On one side he had downstate Democrats saying they are getting pounded by constituents for a shall-issue right-to-carry bill. On the other side, he’s got Rahm and the Chicago Democrats throwing everything and the kitchen sink into the legislature to pass gun control like we’ve never seen. Madigan knows if either side gets a clean win, it’ll be a bloodbath either in Chicago or downstate. So he’s splitting the baby. He’s giving some red-meat to downstate voters to salvage some downstate Democrats their jobs in part because of some very unpopular votes to come (can you say gay marriage and so-called “medical” marijuana). And he’s giving Chicago Democrats some of what they wanted in terms of no guns in parks, public transportation and a host of other prohibited locations. “What if we decline?” I asked one source. He didn’t laugh. He was dead serious. If we decline his offer, he’s going to stuff a may issue law up our rear ends, without any lube, and move on. He’s done “playing around” on the issue and will let the chips fall where they may as there are bigger issues in Illinois (see above list). So, folks, that’s where we are. There’s no cliff. Too many politicians have gone squishy and don’t want to run over it. It’s this or another ten years of legal wrangling to undo whatever else we can get done here and now. And the bright spot is we will only need 60 votes to tweak this in the future if the governor’s copacetic. Didn’t we get screwed once before? Yes, we did. Again, the Speaker (not sure why I’m capitalizing as he doesn’t deserve the respect) has blessed this “compromise” and told the Democratic caucus that he plans on moving it forward and expects to it to pass. Madigan also expects the Governor will veto the bill and he’s planning on over-riding that veto. There you go

476. Collections of antique firearms; certificates of uselessness. No provision hereof shall prevent that private collections of antique firearms, which may not be used as weapons. be preserved and maintained and that their owners possess them as ornaments or as matters of curiosity, nor the collections of firearms kept as relics, but for the preservation of any weapon of those included in this section the prior inspection thereof and approval therefor by the Commissioner shall be necessary and he shall render such firearms unless, so that the same may not be used as such. The Commissioner shall issue a certificate of uselessness of all the weapons possessed under the provisions of this section, and the possession of any firearm not included in said certificate shall be subject to all the provisions hereof. ****

Attached Images

	IMG_5539.jpg (97.7 KB)
	IMG_5540.jpg (117.4 KB)
	IMG_5541.jpg (122.7 KB)

Attached Images

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1369264507.468169.jpg (242.0 KB)

Attached Images

JanesHolster-LR.jpg (33.0 KB)

The message of the statement is clear: “The idea now of investing additional funds in Maryland and thus rewarding a Government that has insulted our customers and our products is offensive to us so we will take steps to evaluate such investments in other States. At the same time, we will continue our current necessary operations within Maryland and we are thankful for and welcome the continued support of our employees as we do so.”

Attached Images

single action holster.jpg (87.2 KB)

Attached Images

10-22_crown.jpg (59.1 KB)

A high-tech startup is wading into the gun control debate with a wireless controller that would allow gun owners to know when their weapon is being moved - and disable it remotely.

Attached Images

	IMG_2791.jpg (73.5 KB)
	IMG_2846.jpg (85.1 KB)

Attached Images

Coltwalker.jpg (80.7 KB)