1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

6.5-20x50mm Scope: Burris fullfield II Tactical-$454 vs Leupold Mark 4-$1200

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Will Learn, Dec 23, 2007.

  1. Will Learn

    Will Learn Well-Known Member

    I'm looking for 6.5-20x50mm scope and am looking for some opinions. I know the Leupold is probably superior, but is it $746 better? I've heard good things about Burris products and they have a "forever" warranty so if anything ever went wrong with it I could send it back to them.

    What would I be gaining by going with the Leupold? Does anyone have experience with Burris warranty services? If anyone could offer anymore affordable options with target knobs/Mildot and similar magnification I would appreciate it. I'm on a budget at the moment so any money I could save would help.
  2. MAX100

    MAX100 Well-Known Member

    Take a look at the Millett Tactical TRS Scope 30mm Tube 4-16x 50mm Side Focus Illuminated Mil-Dot Reticle scope it is as good or better than the Fullfield II scope. It has over 100 moa of vertical and horizontal adj. It comes with a Lifetime replacement Guarantee and Millett has excellent customer service. I have one and love it. The reviews on Midway USA is excellent.

    Millett Tactical Scope Link:

  3. retrieverman

    retrieverman Well-Known Member

    For a 6.5-20x50mm scope, I went with a Zeiss Conquest. It would be worth your look.
  4. Strongbad

    Strongbad Well-Known Member

    I'm a big fan of Burris, and wouldn't hesitate on one, but another in that price range that I shot recently was a Nikon tactical. The friend of mine who owns it paid a smidge over $500 for it and it's a slick little scope, with a couple different sets of knobs depending on your preference.

Share This Page