1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

And you thought the anti gunners had backed down on gun control

Discussion in 'Activism' started by quietman, Apr 26, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. quietman

    quietman New Member

    May 7, 2010
    Rocky Mountain States

    Read these:
    Gun owner privacy at stake…

    Nightmare come true | National Association for Gun Rights

    A new anti-gun crusade | National Association for Gun Rights

    You need to keep up to date, stay in touch with your representatives, and even if it's only $5, contribute to the organizations fighting for the 2nd amendment.

    The anti gunners like Soros aren't backing off, so we can't afford to either.
  2. Jorg Nysgerrig

    Jorg Nysgerrig Member

    Apr 13, 2006
    This all seems somewhat disingenuous to me.
    This bill affects all internet users. It doesn't target gun owners specifically. While it is certainly concerning, to describe it as "gun control" seems to be a bit of a stretch.

    As for this one, it claims, "In fact, Congresswoman McCarthy’s bill would turn widows into instant FELONS if their late husbands possessed a 12-round magazine!"

    But that's simply not true based on the actual text of the bill, those would be grandfathered: (ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed within the United States on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection

    After that, it's a bunch of, "he said, she said" of all the things the senate might add if the bill gets there. Since it's a house bill stuck in committee since the day it was introduced, that's some pretty wild speculation.

    This one claims the National League of Cities has all these stated goals, but I can't find any reference to these stated goals. You'd think the site would have some evidence to back up these claims.

    It's important to remain aware of what's going on, but alarmist stories don't do us any favors.
  3. Rail Driver

    Rail Driver Senior Member

    Apr 16, 2010
    Tallahassee, FL
    Jorg: I agree with you on pretty much everything you said.

    CISPA though, is VERY dangerous to EVERYONE. If you haven't checked the thread I posted in Activism (along with exerpts and explanations of CISPA) you really should take a few minutes to read it.

    CISPA isn't necessarily gun control, it's more like populace control. "Here, we're gonna lock you in the closet and set your house on fire, but don't worry - it's for your own safety!"
  4. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Jan 3, 2003
    0 hrs east of TN

    Besides the factual accuracy question I don't see any clear plan of action here.

    This forum isn't for crying "Alarm, alarm!" or making vague general exhortations to do something. A specific plan of action is required that other members can put into play otherwise the thread needs to be in General.
  5. Owen Sparks

    Owen Sparks member

    May 27, 2007
    Nothing will happen before the elections.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page