1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Browning Buck Mark Hunter vs. Ruger 22/45?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Kynoch, Mar 27, 2013.

  1. Kynoch

    Kynoch member

    I'm looking for a rimfire pistol for use in Steel Challenge shooting. I want to use iron sights and I have narrowed down my choices to the following with the the associated pros and cons:


    Browning Buck Mark Hunter

    * 7.25" barrel (longer sight radius.)

    * Fiber optic front sight.

    * Aluminum vs. polymer frame.

    * Better trigger than the Ruger out of the box.

    * Though perhaps not as reliable as the Ruger, it appears the Buck Mark is still plenty reliable. Reliable enough for action shooting events.

    * From what I have read, those with larger hands (which I have) typically prefer the Buck Mark to the 22/45.


    * More expensive (about $75.00)

    * Mags are a bit more expensive than the Ruger.

    * Concerns about the finish quality of the Hunter. Is it coated?


    Ruger 22/45 with replaceable wood grip panels

    * Paramount reliability.

    * Less expensive


    Shorter sight radius.

    Less ergonomic grip for those with big hands.

    Trigger needs work to bring it to the Buck Mark's level.

    Sadly while I have shot the 22/45 I have never even seen a Buck Mark Hunter so I am faced with taking a gamble and ordering one. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks.
  2. hentown

    hentown Well-Known Member

    I recently acquired a Ruger Mark III 22/45 with threaded barrel, no sights. I installed the VQ accurizing kit @ around $100 (o.k. by me) and now have a really good, adjustable trigger.

    Liked the first one so much that I more recently acquired the Target Model with 5.5" barrel. I personally wouldn't want a 7.5" barrel, but that's just a matter of personal preference. I only installed the VQ target trigger @ about $35, instead of the complete VQ kit. Honed and polished the engagement surfaces and the result is a trigger almost as good as the one with the complete VQ kit.

    Given the plethora of aftermarket add-ons, etc., and the ruggedness of the Ruger, they're hard to beat. You can increase the girth of the grip by using fatter grip panels.
  3. Fishbed77

    Fishbed77 Well-Known Member

    Both are great.

    Personally, I prefer the all-steel Ruger Mark III (preferably with the LCI and mag disconnect removed, and a Volquartsen trigger and sear installed).
  4. Kynoch

    Kynoch member

    Thanks for the feedback. The 7.25" barrel is one of the prime benefits (to me) of the Buck Mark as it's a competitive edge in action shooting when not using a dot or other optic.

    I had considered the S&W M41 with a 6 7/8 barrel -- a superb feeling firearm, but they are simply not as reliable as the Rugers in competition from what I have seen. I have seen few Brownings being used in competition but apparently they are nearly as reliable as the Rugers...
  5. Kynoch

    Kynoch member

    I have a Ruger MKII and a MKIII. Good guns but I don't care for the grip angle and my hands feel too large for the grips so I have already discounted them from my search.
  6. tuj

    tuj Well-Known Member

    you won't go wrong with either one. How much aftermarket stuff do you want to do? Any? If so, get the Ruger.
  7. jmr40

    jmr40 Well-Known Member

    Had em both. I just prefer the Ruger slightly better, but the Browning ain't bad at all.
  8. Kynoch

    Kynoch member

    I can't think of two many things I would change. Possibly some skateboard tape on the grips and possibly a new rear sight? If I got the Browning perhaps the Heggis spring flip trick (not new parts needed) and not much else.
  9. Kynoch

    Kynoch member

    Did you own these exact two models? What made you choose the Ruger over the Browning?
  10. PGT

    PGT Well-Known Member

    I have a 22/45 BlackLITE and a Buckmark Target Black Label. Hands down, the Browning feels better in hand and has a better trigger. It's more expensive however.

  11. beatledog7

    beatledog7 Well-Known Member

    Buckmark. Amazing target pistol.
  12. Kynoch

    Kynoch member

    I am happy to hear the Buck Mark "feels better in hand." The Ruger MKI-III feel very small in my hands. This is less true of the 22/45 but I still feel constricted.

    Can anyone here compare a Buck Mark to an S&W M41 in terms of how they feel in hand?

    I have read a lot lately and it sounds as if the Buck Mark has nearly the same reliability as the 22/45?
  13. Shipwreck

    Shipwreck Well-Known Member

    I like the Buckmark better too - a few years ago, I looked at all the various 22 models. Even rented a few. I liked the buckmark best, and that is what I got.

    Much easier to take apart than the Ruger as well.
  14. Taurus 617 CCW

    Taurus 617 CCW Well-Known Member

    I sought out a used Ruger 22/45 Mark 2. I compared it against a customer's Mark 3 with the Volquartsen trigger kit installed. I actually liked my trigger better. I have never regretted purchasing my 22/45. Take down and reassembly is a cinch once you know the trick.
  15. jmr40

    jmr40 Well-Known Member

    The Ruger is available in SS. That was the deciding factor for me
  16. hentown

    hentown Well-Known Member

    Pardon my ignorance, but I've never competed: What's the most distant target used in the Steel competition?
  17. anothernewb

    anothernewb Well-Known Member

    buckmark is available in stainless too. just not in the long barrel version that I know of.

    The hunter I have looks like it's parkerized. it's coated similar to my AR, and has proven to be very durable.
  18. 5-SHOTS

    5-SHOTS Well-Known Member

    I had the same dilemma monts ago and red a bunch of treads obout the Ruger vs the Browning and for me was a tie match. Ended up getting the Norinco TT-Olympia because it is an all steel gun and very simple to take down.
  19. Crunchy Frog

    Crunchy Frog Well-Known Member

    I looked at this issue myself when a local club started offering Steel Challenge matches.

    I shot my first match using a borrowed Buckmark. By the next month I had purchased a Ruger 22/45. I like the Buckmark but there were two factors that favored the Ruger.

    First keep in mind that you will need five magazines. The Ruger came with two, the Bucky with one. The Ruger mags were less expensive than the Brownings to boot.

    Also you will be dry firing your pistol during the match. When you finish shooting each stage, the range officer will have you drop the magazine, show a clear chamber, drop the slide/bolt, then point the gun downrange and pull the trigger.

    The Ruger is perfectly fine to dry fire. The Browning? It's questionable. There was a fellow at one match with a Bucky that he was really concerned about dry firing. He stuffed a little plastic strip into the edge of his chamber at the end of each stage, to cushion the blow of the firing pin. To me that would get old fast.
  20. Pilot

    Pilot Well-Known Member

    I have three Ruger MK II's, and a MK II era 22/45. The Rugers are reliable, over built, accurate, and very easily modified to have really nice triggers.

Share This Page