1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

campaign finance: unintended consequences...or not?

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Monkeyleg, Jul 9, 2004.

  1. Monkeyleg

    Monkeyleg Mentor

    Dec 25, 2002
    Decatur, AL
    The co-author of the Campaign Finance Reform legislation (otherwise known as the Repeal of the First Amendment) is facing some serious challengers here in WI.

    The best-funded challenger is Russ Darrow, who owns 20 new car dealerships that bear his name. He's been running a fair number of campaign ads, and is largely funding his own campaign for the moment.

    And therein lies the rub. Since the car ads mention "Russ Darrow Pontiac" or "Russ Darrow Buick," the question before the Federal Elections Commision is whether the ads for his car dealerships constitute illegal political advertising. Yep, that's right, folks. They're suggesting that his company not run any advertising 60 days before the election.

    That sixty-day period is also one during which most car dealers advertise the most.

    Not even George Orwell or Ayn Rand could have predicted this.

    The full story is too long to post here, so here's the link: http://www.jsonline.com/news/state/jul04/242434.asp
  2. deej

    deej Member

    Dec 24, 2002
    (Occupied) California Republic
    Everything old is new again:


Share This Page