1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Canadian Crime Soars

Discussion in 'Legal' started by JoeSF, Jan 5, 2006.

  1. JoeSF

    JoeSF Member

    Jan 8, 2003
    Reaping what we sow

    David Frum, National Post
    Published: Tuesday, January 03, 2006

    After a spasm of heart-rending, frightening violence, Toronto's Mayor, David Miller, and its news media want Torontonians to remember one thing: The city is very, very safe. Really.

    "Chicago: 445 homicides. Washington D.C.: 195 homicides. Baltimore: 268 homicides. Toronto: 78 homicides." So opened a story in Sunday's Toronto Star.

    If there is any problem in Toronto, the Mayor insists, it is traceable to the United States: "The U.S. is exporting its problem of violence to the streets of Toronto," David Miller complained on Dec. 27.

    And naturally Prime Minister Paul Martin agreed. "What we saw yesterday is a stark reminder of the challenge that governments, police forces and communities face to ensure that Canadian cities do not descend into the kind of rampant gun violence we have seen elsewhere."

    Feel better now? Well, don't. The Prime Minister, the Mayor and the media are hiding crucial facts. Here are three:

    1) America's crime problem has dramatically improved, while Canada's is becoming seriously worse. Toronto's 78 homicides in 2005 appears to compare favorably to the homicide totals of the three American cities cited by the Star. But those 78 Toronto homicides in 2005 represent a 28% increase over the 61 homicides recorded in Toronto in 1995. Meanwhile, the three U.S. cities cited by the Star each achieved dramatic decreases over the past decade: Chicago down 46% from 823, Washington down 46% from 365, Baltimore down 17% from 322.

    More broadly: Canada's overall crime rate is now 50% higher than the crime rate in the United States. Read that again slowly -- it seems incredible, but it's true. It's true too that you are now more likely to be mugged in Toronto than in New York City.

    2) America's crime problem is becoming concentrated in ever fewer places, while Canada's is spreading out to ever more places.

    The United States is a huge country, and it will always be possible to find a jurisdiction with shocking crime numbers. The overwhelming majority of Americans, however, live in places that are becoming steadily safer. Since the early 1990s, crime rates have dropped in 48 of the 50 states and 80% of American cities. Over that same period, crime rates have risen in six of the 10 Canadian provinces and in seven of Canada's 10 biggest cities.

    3) While American cities and states are adopting anti-crime policies proved to work, Canadian cities and provinces are adopting policies proved to fail.

    Over a decade of successful crime-fighting in the U.S., criminologists and police departments have learned some important lessons.

    Bluntly: prison works. Criminals do not commit crimes while they are held in prison. Yet a Canadian criminal is 80% less likely to go to jail than his American counterpart.

    Putting police on the streets works. Yet Canada employs 25% fewer police officers per capita than the United States.

    Enforcing laws against vagrancy, prostitution and drug dealing works. Yet Canada is either decriminalizing or tolerating all three. The right kinds of gun laws work too: for example, extending the sentence of any criminal who commits any crime -- down to jaywalking -- while in possession of a gun.

    Gun registries and gun bans on the other hand do not work. Youth programs do not work. Counselling does not work. Grants to community activists, peer counsellors and after-school facilities do not work. The $50-million Paul Martin has just announced for local crime-prevention will be directed to individuals and groups connected to the Liberal party's patronage machine. That money will do nothing to enhance the safety of the City of Toronto. And if it finds its way to individuals or groups who lobby against effective law-enforcement, that money will actually make the problem worse.

    It is not guns from across the border that threaten Canadians. It is the weak and cynical policies of home-grown politicians, and especially the Chretien/Martin Liberals. The $2-billion wasted on the gun registry could have paid for more cops, more prisons, more of everything that would protect the lives and security of Canadians. It is the federal Liberal government that releases young offenders back into the community, the federal Liberals who appoint the judges who refuse to punish, the federal Liberals who run the prison system as if it were a summer camp, the federal Liberals who refuse to deport immigrants who break the law, the federal Liberals who have subordinated public safety to ethnic politics.

    And then it is the federal Liberals who have the gross and extreme indecency to try to exploit for their own selfish political ends the crime and grief and suffering for which they bear so much of the blame.

  2. dolanp

    dolanp Active Member

    Feb 20, 2005
    Good analysis.
  3. rick_reno

    rick_reno member

    Dec 25, 2002
    Here's an example of what's wrong with our neighbors to the North...

    For example, one day in 2004, a couple of Canadians returned home, to Lester B. Pearson International Airport in Toronto. They were the son and widow of a fellow called Ahmed Said Khadr, who back on the Pakistani-Afghan frontier was known as "al-Kanadi." Why? Because he was the highest-ranking Canadian in al Qaeda--plenty of other Canucks in al Qaeda, but he was the Numero Uno. In fact, one could argue that the Khadr family is Canada's principal contribution to the war on terror. Granted they're on the wrong side (if you'll forgive my being judgmental) but no one can argue that they aren't in the thick of things. One of Mr. Khadr's sons was captured in Afghanistan after killing a U.S. Special Forces medic. Another was captured and held at Guantanamo. A third blew himself up while killing a Canadian soldier in Kabul. Pa Khadr himself died in an al Qaeda shootout with Pakistani forces in early 2004. And they say we Canadians aren't doing our bit in this war!

    In the course of the fatal shootout of al-Kanadi, his youngest son was paralyzed. And, not unreasonably, Junior didn't fancy a prison hospital in Peshawar. So Mrs. Khadr and her boy returned to Toronto so he could enjoy the benefits of Ontario government health care. "I'm Canadian, and I'm not begging for my rights," declared the widow Khadr. "I'm demanding my rights."

    As they always say, treason's hard to prove in court, but given the circumstances of Mr. Khadr's death it seems clear that not only was he providing "aid and comfort to the Queen's enemies" but that he was, in fact, the Queen's enemy. The Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry, the Royal 22nd Regiment and other Canucks have been participating in Afghanistan, on one side of the conflict, and the Khadr family had been over there participating on the other side. Nonetheless, the prime minister of Canada thought Boy Khadr's claims on the public health system was an excellent opportunity to demonstrate his own deep personal commitment to "diversity." Asked about the Khadrs' return to Toronto, he said, "I believe that once you are a Canadian citizen, you have the right to your own views and to disagree."
  4. longeyes

    longeyes member

    Dec 25, 2002
    True West...Hotel California
    Illuminating post, Rick.

    This is indeed a strange new modern form of schizophrenia. The answer to the Elephant in the Living Room is apparently to add more rooms, at government expense, to the house and make sure there's plenty of provender for Mr. Pachyderm.
  5. El Tejon

    El Tejon Elder

    Dec 24, 2002
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Longeyes, that's because it takes less political will to ignore the problem rather than address it and correct it. Path of least resistence and all.:D
  6. dasmi

    dasmi Senior Member

    Feb 20, 2005
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Oh, quit your bitching and deal with the problems in your city, you bed-wetting little girl. I am so tired of this whiney crap! It's all America's fault! Blah blah blah.
    I like this reporter!
  7. Manedwolf

    Manedwolf member

    Nov 10, 2005
    New Hampshire
    Manchester, "gun-filled" New Hampshire homicides: 5.
  8. carlrodd

    carlrodd Active Member

    Dec 20, 2005
    more police, more prisons, more/harsher penalties.....yes, yes, yes. i don't however disagree with counseling etc. the key is that the two are NOT mutually exclusive......tough, tough love......counseling while splitting rocks is the way. listen up canucks!
  9. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Dec 24, 2002
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Actually, that's not true. Criminals prey upon one another in prison—but their predations aren't counted as crimes unless they're prosecuted in local courts, which isn't often.

    Feeding the elephant in the house helps the two-legged occupants remain in fear. Fear is a key prerequisite for the advance of socialism.
  10. TallPine

    TallPine Mentor

    Dec 26, 2002
    somewhere in the middle of Montana
    Well, I'm glad to see that we are finally doing something about our trade deficit


Share This Page