1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Case hardened hammer and trigger question

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by greenhorng, Mar 17, 2013.

  1. greenhorng

    greenhorng Active Member

    Why do you see case hardening on some stainless revolvers within the same model and others seem to have a stainless finish? For example, I've seen S&W Model 66's both ways.
  2. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    S&W started using stainless to build guns before suitable stainless was avaiable to make hammers and triggers out of it.
    Early guns maintained case hardened high wear parts.

    Later on, they started plating them.

    Still later they started using MIM hammers & triggers that are not case hardened but hard clear through.

  3. CraigC

    CraigC Well-Known Member

    If you see a S&W with a silver hammer and trigger, it's flash chromed, not stainless.
  4. 9mmepiphany

    9mmepiphany Moderator

    Yup, they flash chrome the hammer and trigger so it blends better
  5. Jim K

    Jim K Well-Known Member

    A bit of history might be interesting. In the 1920's American companies imported Spanish-made revolvers that were at best so-so and at worst cast iron junk. Many of those copied the S&W M&P revolver, at least in outward appearance, and were often sold as genuine S&W revolvers, at a quarter the cost of a genuine S&W.

    One of the steps S&W took to stop that was to trademark its use of color case hardening on the hammer and trigger. If the Spanish continued to case color those parts, the guns would be stopped by customs for trademark infringement; if they stopped, the guns would not look like S&W's.

    Unlike a copyright or a patent, a trademark is protected indefinitely, but in order to keep it in effect, it must be used and defended. Since S&W does not want to lose that trademark protection, they will keep coloring hammers and triggers, even though it is not really case hardening and the MIM parts are hard all the way through.

  6. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    The only problem with that is.
    S&W was case hardening hammers & triggers well before the 1920's.
    Well before 1900 in fact.

    They always case hardened hammers & triggers from the Model 1 forward to prevent any wear on sears and hammer notches.

    The most noticeable addition I know of to combat Spanish forgeries was the addition of the Spanish 'Marcus Registradas' stamp on the lower right side of the frame.

    Roy Jinks has noted that the company found it necessary following an infringement lawsuit in the 1920s to mark their exports to Spain with a Spanish-language trademark to protect their legal rights there.

    The 'Marcus Registradas' stamp was resurrected after WWII when the four line address on the frame became standard.

  7. wheelyfun66

    wheelyfun66 Well-Known Member

    I just bought a 66-4 that has the stainless trigger and hammer


    have seen 66-4 that had case hardened instead.....?
  8. aliveisalive

    aliveisalive Well-Known Member

    I prefer jeweled triggers and hammers :)
  9. CraigC

    CraigC Well-Known Member

    Flash chromed, not stainless.
  10. dfariswheel

    dfariswheel Well-Known Member

    To restate:

    The first stainless steel revolvers were the S&W Model 60, followed closely by the Model 66.
    For about the first two years these models had true stainless steel hammers and triggers.

    S&W was not satisfied with the wear characteristics of these parts, so they changed to standard color case hardened hammers and trigger which were given a "flash" plating of hard chrome so the parts would better match the stainless of the rest of the gun, and to be more rust resistant.

    In the early 1990's S&W stopped giving the hammer and trigger the flash plating as a cost savings and used ordinary color cased parts until the old style forged steel hammers and triggers were changed to MIM.

    Flash plated hammers and triggers are recognized by the satin-flat gray color, versus the bright polish of the early true stainless parts.
  11. WardenWolf

    WardenWolf member

    The problem with case hardening, though, is it makes it impossible to do trigger jobs on older Smiths without compromising the parts' structural integrity. Once you cut through that thin surface layer, it will start having rapid wear. It's fine for people who use their guns as-is, but for those who want to tune them it's a major dealbreaker. Most of the older Smiths didn't exactly have the best triggers, either.
  12. CraigC

    CraigC Well-Known Member

    Easily remedied by re-hardening the sear engagement surfaces.
  13. willypete

    willypete Well-Known Member

    "Marcas Registradas" is Latin for "Registered Trademark."

    "Marca Registrada" is Spanish for "Registered Trademark."

    The phrase on the side of a Smith and Wesson is in Latin.
  14. Driftwood Johnson

    Driftwood Johnson Well-Known Member

    Huh? All of my older Smiths have terrific single action triggers. They break clean and smooth with no creep at all.

    I have heard the story about either patenting or trademarking Smith's case hardening process too. I have several of them from the 1920s and 1930s with REG U.S. PATENT OFF. stamped on the hammers and back of the triggers. I am pretty sure patenting or trademarking the process is what that was all about. I will ask around.

  15. Peter M. Eick

    Peter M. Eick Well-Known Member

    I agree with Driftwood. Pre-numbered S&W triggers are spectacular. Of my roughly 30 odd 38/44's I don't have a single "bad" trigger in the bunch. All are smooth and crisp.
  16. WardenWolf

    WardenWolf member

    Pre-numbered, yes, but keep in mind that they kept using case hardening even after they started producing them with worse triggers. My M&P from 1954-1956 has an excellent trigger. My late grandfather's 10-5 has an awful one that's only made slightly better with a reduced power hammer spring.
  17. rswartsell

    rswartsell Well-Known Member

    Uhhhh....just picked up my Model 10-5 and dry fired a few times (with snap caps).

    Think gramps must've got a bad'n cuz.

    Just say'n.
  18. .22-5-40

    .22-5-40 Well-Known Member

    1+ what dfariswheel said. Stainless steel, while very tough..is a "gummy" metal..never will get the glass-hard surface of a case-hardned steel..or the silky smooth/glass rod breaking feel of a classic S&W.
  19. Driftwood Johnson

    Driftwood Johnson Well-Known Member

    Howdy Again

    Your original statement was 'Most of the older Smiths didn't exactly have the best triggers, either.'

    I don't consider a 10-5 to be an older Smith.


    Just got an answer from the S&W Forum about the trademarking of the colors on S&W hammers and triggers.

    "The trade mark consists of a mottled color pattern predominantly brownish-gray and blue applied to the hammer and trigger of the arm by an appropriate color process."

    Trademark 207951, issued Jan. 12, 1926.

    The document is printed in Neal & Jinks on one of the last unnumbered pages just before the Bibliography and Index.
  20. Macchina

    Macchina Well-Known Member

    Case hardening is specifically applied to steels that lack enough carbon to form martensite structures. When you case harden something, you introduce carbon to its surface (around .05" deep before final polish) then complete the hardening cycle. If you grind through the "hardness" you will not have enough carbon to harden the soft metal underneath.
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2013

Share This Page