1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Constitutional convention over this?!

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Manedwolf, Jun 15, 2006.

  1. Manedwolf

    Manedwolf member

    Doesn't matter what the particular feelings on the issue is, so I advise to not get the thread locked..but THIS is from the Evans-Novak report. Read Part 2 carefully.

    Not only are there a LOT more important issues going on right now than this, but look at who is blatantly sticking their fingers into politics in the second bit. They want to push for a Constitutional Convention, despite the unlikelihood of that? Are they actively TRYING to fracture and destroy the Republic?

    I think it's time to yank some religious organizations' tax-exempt status, NOW. You can be a religion or a blatant lobbyist group, but not both, and that's BY LAW.

    I call it a clear-cut case of rule of law, if they want to do that.
  2. joab

    joab Well-Known Member

    I also don't think it matters what position you assume on the gay marriage issue.
    Is it really a matter for constitutional amendment?

    The constitution is a list of what we permit the government to do not of who an individual or two can cuddle with.
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2006
  3. Zundfolge

    Zundfolge Well-Known Member

    I love it, I'm GLAD (no pun intended) they are trying so hard to get this passed as a constitutional amendment.

    No, I don't agree with amending the constitution over this and nor do I think they will get it passed.

    But if the legislature is wasting their time wrestling with this issue they aren't doing other things to us.

    So in the end its a win-win :evil:
  4. boofus

    boofus Guest

    Makes sense. The more time those nitwits in Congress spend bloviating over worthless legislation like flag burning bans and gay marraige bans the less time they can spend scheming on how to take away people's property.
  5. Brian Williams

    Brian Williams Moderator Emeritus

    Moved to L&P lets see what we can discuss about 2nd amendment issues that might come out of a Constitutional convention and keep it off of Homosexual marriage
  6. Thefabulousfink

    Thefabulousfink Well-Known Member

    I'm a little fuzzy on the details of a Constitutional Convention, (PolySci was a few years ago) is it called to address a specific issue, or can any old constitutional ammendment be put on the ballot?
  7. the pistolero

    the pistolero Well-Known Member

    I think it's past time some of them had that status revoked. We know how many of them are advocates for yet more gun restrictions.

    :D It's been said that "no man's liberty or property is safe as long as the (Texas) Legislature is in session." I think the same could be said for Congress, as well.
  8. Mikee Loxxer

    Mikee Loxxer Well-Known Member

    I hate the idea of amending the constitution over this as I feel that it will cheapen it. I feel that this is being used by the Republicans to distract us from much more important issues like Social Security insolvency and Energy (things they are too cowardly to risk their precious political careers trying to fix).

    Trying to stop culture is pointless as people will do what people will do and if it does no harm to others it should not be something politicians deal with. That being said, what does this have to do wtih the Second Amendment?
  9. Henry Bowman

    Henry Bowman Senior Member

    FabFink: My understanding is that once convened, the whole think is open season.
  10. 308win

    308win Well-Known Member

    I believe Henry is correct, anything could be fair game under whatever rules the convnetion adopted.
  11. Desertdog

    Desertdog Well-Known Member

    Please do not even think about having a Constitutional Convention.

    Amend the Constitution 1 Amendment at a time.

    If there should ever be a Constitutiona Convention, it will open each and every Amendment to be re-written.

    Do you the Shumer crowd rewriting the BOR to suit themselves?
  12. rms/pa

    rms/pa Well-Known Member

    henry,308win and desertdog have it spot on.

    once a constitutional convention is called there are NO limits on what can happen. the only hold back is the new constitution has to be ratified.

    everything would be up for grabs and if some of the shenanigans that accompanied the income tax amendment are an example life could get very interesting.

  13. Mannlicher

    Mannlicher Well-Known Member

    This just gets WAY too deep into the prerogatives of the individual States. Marriage has always been subject to State Law. There is zero reason for the Feds to be involved at all. Zero. This issue should be resolved by the various States, not the Feds.
    I shudder to think what a balls up will result if Constitutional Conventions. The Constitution SHOULD be very difficult to ammend. All you have to do is look at the Florida Constitution to see what an unworkable patchwork a document becomes when willy nilly ammendments clutter up the landscape. Things are bad enough without this mess going any further.
  14. wheelgunslinger

    wheelgunslinger Well-Known Member

    yeah, but if the people backing this amendment cant push it through congress, then they sure can't get a Con-con rolling, much less finished.
    These religious groups better back off the government. The backlash could be severe.
  15. mbt2001

    mbt2001 Well-Known Member

    Well, I don't think that we should amend the constitution over this issue, however I am puzzled about what this really means.

    Obviously we are fighting a culture war and trying to identify ourselves as a country and as a society. Frankly, I think that the only way to resolve the issues is for the Governors of all 50 states to get together and the agree that each state is going to pass a cultural constitution and that those can never be revoked or changed and that state law must be viewed in accordance with it.

    That will mean that certain states can stay conservative and others can stay liberal and we can all laugh at one another. If some issues are of a true importance, then move... Isn't a big deal. I am just tired of libs coming here and changing things and conservatives going there and changing things... We have a right to have God taught in school if a majority of the voters say we do... end of story. Obviously it wouldn't be that way in every state and therefore no one is being FORCED, because we can decide where to live...

    Not perfect, but I canna think of another way.
  16. beerslurpy

    beerslurpy member

    A constitutional convention wont fix anything because most of the problems today result from perfectly good text being twisted by the supreme court or ignored by all 3 branches.

    Any government that can twist "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" into "only disasembled long guns and no handguns whatsoever, with no bearing whatsoever" is really beyond the reach of written laws.
  17. xd9fan

    xd9fan Well-Known Member

    yup the Marriage Amendment and flag burning. Thats all the GOP controled Govt can think of for Amendments..........and they wonder why they are in trouble........
  18. roscoe

    roscoe Well-Known Member

    Methinks a little clarification of the 2nd and 4th amendments are in order in any convention.
  19. LAK

    LAK Well-Known Member

    A convention would be a disaster. A Pandora's box.

    Anyone who thinks such a thing would be of any possible benefit to us concerning the the 2nd or 4th amendments (or any other issue for that matter) under the current political climate and sentiment that is deeply entrenched in our present gov would do well to see what happened to the Swiss recently. Read - and understand - the former Swiss Constitution - and then the current new Constitution that was adopted just a few years ago.


  20. RealGun

    RealGun Well-Known Member

    Except that public schools depend upon federal funding, and that funding would be withdrawn (for good reason). That is only true because of the power achieved by the income tax amendment. This is the reason that church schools are privately funded and, along with a desire to maintain racial integration, is why voucher programs as a hat trick workaround are strongly opposed.

    I believe the income tax is the number one reason why we live in a very different country than the Founders. Flat tax and the like do not address the problem. Income tax should be collected by the States and trickle up to, not down from, the federal government. Reallocation could still occur by per capita assessment, but only sparsely populated or relatively poor States would be particularly dependent as they are now.

    Federal defense, interstate infrastructure, and legitimate administrative responsibilities (of common interest to the States) would need to be covered primarily by commerce taxes.

Share This Page