1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Convenience store owner uses gun to defend himself in the Land of Hippies

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Capital Punishment, Jan 5, 2006.

  1. Capital Punishment

    Capital Punishment Well-Known Member


    I see 2 things that went wrong here.
    1. The store-owner was shot and injured.
    2. The scum crooks aren't in body bags.

    However, I see 3 positive things here.
    1. For being 3 versus 1, he still managed to hit 2 of the ***holes.
    2. The bystander kids from school will not have a positive influence and incentive not to revert to a life of crime, as they see the results. :p
    3. Its pretty safe to say that those kids wont be robbing that store again.

    Kudos to the gun-toting store owner for standing up for himself, his business and his patrons. He was outnumbered 3 to 1 but still managed to put 2 of them in the hospital. Now next time he shouldnt waste his time with that panic button and just make sure he has enough gun. ;)

    Im suprised the local media around here didnt say something more like "3 nearly killed in convenience store brawl because of gun-toting menace".
  2. Preacherman

    Preacherman Well-Known Member

    Methinks Mr. Store-Owner needs to invest some of his profits in a good concealed bulletproof vest... :uhoh:
  3. K-Romulus

    K-Romulus Well-Known Member

    Guess what?

    The anti-gun-owner crowd actually ginned up a "study" that they claim "shows" that teenagers who witness "gun violence" in ANY form are more likely to "be violent" later in life!:eek:
  4. mmike87

    mmike87 Well-Known Member

    If that's true then Darwin WAS right. See someone get shot, makes you want to go out and get shot, too. Survival of the fittest.
  5. beaucoup ammo

    beaucoup ammo Well-Known Member


    Has Maryland always held an "anti-gun" attitude..or just since the sniper incidents from a couple of years back?

    I read where New York is going to put the squeeze on gun ownership even more than in the past. You folks (IMO) need to get to a gun friendly state while you still have the chance..if your situation allows it.

    With the middle class getting the working end of the screw driver more than ever, I plan on buying all the guns and ammo I can realisticlly afford..while I still can.

    With so many firearms manufacturers located in New England / North East, it's a shame the sentiment toward one of the regions primary sources of employment (may be wrong..could be automated) is so negative. At least that's the perception. Seems the Baltimore media is anti-gun as well.

    Take Care
  6. Thefabulousfink

    Thefabulousfink Well-Known Member

    If this happened in MD I'm supprised that the store owner wasn't charged with a felony.
  7. lucky_fool

    lucky_fool Well-Known Member

    The thing about the article that irritates me is that they never come out and state the the robbers were armed with guns. They leave that up to the reader to determine by syaing that the store owner was shout multiple times.

    If you don't read between the lines the article looks like he shot some unarmed kids.
  8. SJG26

    SJG26 member

    As Sarah Brady reads her morning paper.............

    "Two juveniles were hit and police say they have non life threatening injuries."

    Calls her office and tells her assistant to add 2 more victims to the "CHILDREN injured by gun violence list"
  9. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Maryland's anti-Second Amendment bigotry goes back several decades.

    By the way, if you think it's a mere coincidence that the most draconian leftist extremist so-called "gun control" laws are passed in the states with the largest raw quantity of political corruption, I've got a bridge in New York City to sell you.
  10. MrTuffPaws

    MrTuffPaws Well-Known Member

    Baltimore is filed with hippies????:confused:
  11. thatguy

    thatguy Well-Known Member

    Hmmm... Am I the only one who sees a problem with opening fire in a store "filled with students?" Nobody wants criminals dead more than I do, but turning rounds loose in a store "filled with students" sounds like a tragedy barely avoided. Killing armed robbers or preventing a hold-up will seem trivial if an innocent kid trying to buy a snickers bar gets gunned down in the process. I wasn't there so I don't know how clear the field of fire was, and apparently no bystanders were hit, but maybe it's better to let the scum walk with the cash rather than risk hitting the kids in the store?
  12. MarshallDodge

    MarshallDodge Well-Known Member

    I would say the store owner needs more practice and more gun. Probably went out and got a .22 pistol thinking that would be enough.

    In a conversation I was having with a friendly restaurant owner he mentioned that he had protection against a robbery and showed me his Bearcat .22 :scrutiny:
  13. beaucoup ammo

    beaucoup ammo Well-Known Member

    Guess You Had To Be There

    But at face value, the scene described wouldn't invite a shoot out. Not if the "convenience store was filled with students and other customers."

    And where does it mention "Hippies?" To be honest, I'd much prefer some "hippies" over the dredges out in the world today.

    Take Care
  14. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    If you've put in your range time and keep a cool head, the danger to students would be greatly reduced. It's all about bullet placement, bullet placement, and bullet placement.
  15. armedandsafe

    armedandsafe Well-Known Member

    Just how did they threaten him? If they called him names and promised verbal abuse, I would agree with you. If one of them rocked the hammer back or snicked off the safety, I'll have to agree with the store operator.

  16. strambo

    strambo Well-Known Member

    The reporter is too busy pushing an agenda to give us enough facts to render judgement. However, realizing it was a reporter and reading between the lines..."Threatened" likely means "with a gun" (we know they had them and got them into action from the owner's injuries) and "2 juveniles were hit" means the owner's aim was good under pressure and only hit the perps or it would have said "2 innocent children mowed down in the cross fire."
  17. means that ther was proably one or two people browseing around in the back you know how papers are the more tramdic the more it sells
  18. molonlabe

    molonlabe Well-Known Member

    San Francisco may be filled with hippies, Baltimore is not.

Share This Page